Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

DOMINASI LAKI-LAKI TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DI RANAH DOMESTIK DALAM NOVEL SAFE HAVEN KARYA NICHOLAS SPARKS Domination of Man towards Woman in the Domestic Sphere in Nicholas Sparks’ Novel Safe Haven Marwinda, Kristin; Margono S., Yosep Bb
Salingka Vol 17, No 2 (2020): SALINGKA, Edisi Desember 2020
Publisher : Balai Bahasa Sumatra Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26499/salingka.v17i2.316

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis gambaran perempuan yang didominasi oleh laki-laki di ranah domestik dalam novel Safe Haven(2010) karya Nicholas Sparks. Kisah dalam novel ini menjadi menarik untuk diteliti karena tokoh utama perempuan digambarkan menjadi korban penindasan yaitu kekerasan dalam rumah tangga atas akibat dari dominasi sang suami. Masalah yang diteliti adalah tentang bagaimana dominasi laki-laki terhadap perempuan dalam novel Safe Haven dan apa akibat yang dialami perempuan atas dominasi tersebut. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kritik sastra feminis yang fokus pada masalah dominasi laki-laki sebagai dampak dari masih adanya budaya patriarki yang melekat pada masyarakat era moderen. Metode yang digunakan yaitu deskriptif-kualitatif, sehingga hasil penelitian adalah penjelasan berupa kata-kata bukan berupa angka. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Kevin Tierney, suami Katie, selalu bersikap lebih mendominasi Katie dalam segala hal, khususnya dalam urusan rumah tangga. Dominasi Kevin terhadap Katie antara lain yaitu berkuasa atas diri Katie, melarang Katie bergaul dengan orang lain, dan berkuasa dalam hal keuangan. Sedangkan akibat dari dominasi Kevin adalah Katie mengalami beberapa penindasan yaitu berupa kekerasan fisik dan non-fisik.vThis study aims to analyze the image of woman dominated by man in the domestic sphere inthe novel Safe Haven (2010) by Nicholas Sparks. The story in this novel is interesting to beinvestigated because the main female character is described as being a victim of oppression,namely domestic violence due to the dominance of her husband. The problem studied is abouthow male domination of women in the novel Safe Haven and what are the consequencesexperienced by women for that dominance. The approach used is from feminism perspectivewhich focuses on the problem of male domination as a result of the persistence of patriarchalculture inherent in modern era society. The method used is descriptive-qualitative, so theresults of the study are explanations in the form of words rather than numbers. The results ofthis study indicate that Kevin Tierney, Katie’s husband, has always been more dominating inKatie’s life, especially in household matters. Kevin’s domination of Katie included being incharge of Katie, forbidding Katie to associate with others, and being in charge of financialmatters. The result of Kevin’s dominance was that Katie experienced some oppression in theform of physical and non-physical violence. Katie’s decision to run away from her husbandand live her new life with another man represents a woman who is able to fight againstinjustice over male domination in the household. Kata-Kata Kunci: Dominasi Laki-laki, penindasan perempuan, feminisme
Framing Justice and Public Perception: A Discourse Analysis of the Agus Salim Donation Controversy in Online Media Inti Englishtina; Steffie Mega Mahardhika; Kristin Marwinda
Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities Innovation Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): June : Proceeding of the International Conference on Social Sciences and Humani
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/icsshi.v1i1.12

Abstract

This study explores the discourse surrounding the Agus Salim donation controversy, focusing on how media narratives and legal rhetoric shape public perception. Drawing on two primary sources—articles from Brilio.net and KapanLagi.com—the research employs critical discourse analysis to examine the framing of key events, including allegations of donation mismanagement, legal strategies, and the public's reaction to the case. The findings reveal how media outlets construct competing narratives, emphasizing the roles of public figures, lawyers, and victims in influencing the discourse. By analyzing language use, power dynamics, and ideological positioning, this study highlights the interplay between legal rhetoric and public opinion in cases of social and moral significance. The research contributes to understanding how controversies are framed in digital media and their implications for justice and accountability in contemporary society.