Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.728
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Justitia et Pax Unes Law Review TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum LUTUR Law Journal PATTIMURA Law Study Review SASI CAPITAN: Constitutional Law & Administrative Law Review Jurnal Saniri
Pattinasarany, Yohanes
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Transparansi Pemerintah Dalam Realisasi Anggran Belanja Barang dan Jasa Suwakul, Rian; Nendissa, Renny Heronia; Pattinasarany, Yohanes
PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Agustus 2025 PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/palasrev.v3i2.23737

Abstract

Transparency in governance is one of the main principles in realizing good governance. Through transparency, the public is able to understand and monitor the budget management process so that it is carried out openly, efficiently, and accountably. In this regard, the Ambon City Government bears a significant responsibility to implement this principle, particularly in the realization of the goods and services expenditure budget. This study aims to examine the forms of transparency implemented by the Ambon City Government in carrying out the goods and services budget, as well as the legal consequences that may arise when the principle of transparency is not upheld. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were obtained from laws and regulations, legal literature, and other supporting documents. The results of the study indicate that transparency within the Ambon City Government is manifested through the implementation of electronic systems such as SIRUP (General Procurement Planning Information System), LPSE (Electronic Procurement Service), and the E-Catalogue, which serve as forms of public information disclosure in accordance with Law Number 14 of 2008 on Public Information Disclosure. Through these systems, the public can access information related to the planning, implementation, and reporting of goods and services procurement in an open manner. However, in practice, several obstacles remain, including low accountability and indications of budget misuse as found by the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK) for the years 2021–2023. A lack of transparency may result in administrative, civil, and criminal legal consequences, such as contract cancellation, sanctions against authorized officials, and liability for state financial losses. Therefore, the implementation of transparency principles is a crucial factor in realizing a clean, accountable, and publicly trusted government.
Ketidakadilan Pengaturan Dana Bagi Hasil Perikanan Pattinasarany, Yohanes
SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2026): Volume 6, Nomor 1, April 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sanisa.v6i1.3914

Abstract

Introduction: The state has determined the percentage of Revenue Sharing Funds (hereinafter abbreviated as DBH) from state revenues from the management of fisheries natural resources between the central government and regional governments through the provisions of Article 119 of Law Number 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations between the Central and Regional Governments. 20% (twenty percent) is the central government's share, and 80% (eighty percent) is the regional share. The 80% (eighty percent) of the regional share is divided among all regencies/cities and provinces that are not divided into autonomous districts/cities in Indonesia.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the inequities in the regulation of Revenue Sharing Funds for fisheries resource management for producing provinces. The research method used is normative legal researchMethods of the Research: The research method used in this paper is normative legal research, which primarily examines positive law provisions, legal principles, and legal doctrines to address the legal issues at hand. The approaches used are the statutory approach and the conceptual approach.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results show that 80% (eighty percent) of the fisheries DBH regulation, which is the regional share, is divided among all regencies/cities and provinces that are not divided into autonomous districts/cities in Indonesia. This indicates that producing provinces do not receive a share of the fisheries DBH distribution. However, districts/cities are not given the authority to manage fishery natural resources. Such a distribution, which excludes producing provinces like Maluku Province, is considered unfair. This differs from the regulation of the Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH) for natural resources in the forestry, mineral and coal, oil and gas, and geothermal sectors. The regulation of the fishery DBH should use a contribution approach to the results obtained from fisheries management activities. This means that the distribution is carried out proportionally as a manifestation of distributive justice in the distribution of the fishery DBH. The regulation of the fishery DBH distribution is adaptive according to the contribution of revenue from the fisheries sector generated by the region.
Keabsahan Kebijakan Pemerintah Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat Mengenai Pemilihan Kepala Desa Adat Secara Serentak Sahertian, Chelsy; Pietersz, Jemmy Jefry; Pattinasarany, Yohanes
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 10 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 10, Desember 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v1i10.864

Abstract

Introduction: The West Seram Regency Government Makes a Policy Regarding the Simultaneous Election of Village Heads which also involves Traditional Villages whose governance arrangements should be based on intestinal origin rights and local customary law.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the authority of the West Seram Regency Government in making the policy of selecting the traditional village head simultaneously and to analyze the validity of the policy of the West Seram Regency Government to make the simultaneous election of the traditional village head. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical, the problem approach used in the research is the statutory and conceptual approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials carried out in this study was library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods.Results of the Research: Based on the research, the policy carried out by the regional government of the western part of Seram Regency to conduct the election of the traditional village head simultaneously has no validity because the provisions of the legislation do not give the local government the authority to conduct the election of the traditional village head simultaneously. However, when the West Seram Regency Regional Regulation No. 11 of 2019 concerning Villages was stipulated, which in Article 3 caused problems in the customary law community in the West Seram district, because the villages as mentioned in Article 3 by the customary law community were customary villages or Therefore, the actions of the regional government of the West Seram Regency make and stipulate the provisions of Article 3 of Regional Regulation No. 11 of 2014 concerning Villages, which stipulates that 92 customary lands or villages become villages is an act of erasing and not recognizing and respecting the country as a traditional village in the West Seram district, which has received recognition in the provisions of Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution which regulates that the State recognizes and respects customary law community units and their traditional rights as long as they are still alive and in accordance with the development of society and the principles of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, which are regulated by law.
Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Maluku Tengah Dalam Menetapkan Negeri Sebagai Desa Adat Pattinasarany, Yohanes; Tjiptabudy, Jantje; Singkery, Michael Rolando
Jurnal Saniri Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Volume 6 Nomor 2, Mei 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/saniri.v6i2.3962

Abstract

Introduction: Negeri merupakan satuan pemerintahan dari kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat di Kabupaten Maluku Tengah sebagai bentuk desa adat yang secara historis, sosiologis, telah ada jauh sebelum terbentuknya negara republic Indonesia dan masih eksis sampai sekarang. Namun sejak ditetapkan UU No. 6 Tahun 2014 mewajibkan pemerintah daerah untuk menetapkan desa adat. Akan tetapi pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Maluku Tengah belum melakukan penetapan terhadap kurang lebih 118 (seratus delepan belas) Negeri dikabupten Maluku Tengah. Purposes of the Research: Menganalisis tanggung jawab Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Maluku Tengah dalam penetapan negeri sebagai desa adat. Serta akibat hukum atas tidak ditetapkannya negeri sebagai desa adat oleh Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Methods of the Research: Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah Yuridis normative. Results / Main Findings / Novelty/Originality of the Research: Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa mewajibkan pemerintah daerah kabupaten/kota menetapkan desa adat melalui Peraturan Daerah sebagai bentuk pengakuan dan perlindungan terhadap kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat. Namun, Pemerintah Kabupaten Maluku Tengah hingga saat ini belum menetapkan negeri-negeri adat sebagai desa adat sebagaimana diamanatkan Pasal 96 dan Pasal 116 UU Desa. Ketiadaan penetapan tersebut menunjukkan belum dilaksanakannya penataan kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat sebagai dasar pembentukan desa adat. Kondisi ini berpotensi menimbulkan akibat hukum berupa tidak terpenuhinya pengakuan dan perlindungan terhadap hak-hak masyarakat hukum adat, termasuk hak dalam sistem pemerintahan adat, pengisian jabatan adat, serta pengelolaan sumber daya alam dan wilayah ulayat negeri.
Co-Authors Andress Deny Bakarbessy Bakarbessy, Andress Denny Baljanan, Gilbert Marc Bulohroy, Flora Tiabetris Celsa Daniel Palpialy Firmansyah, Mohamad Z H Lekipiouw, Sherlock Harjuna, Dian Adinda Hatuluayo, Rasyid Hendrik Salmon Holle, Erick Stenly Jantje Tjiptabudy Jemmy Jefry Pietersz Karels, Alessandro Imanuel Caesarea Karels Lainsamputty, Natanel Lawalata, Carmel Rafaela Lekipiouw, Sherlock Halmes Lelapary, Elfira Louhenapessy, Revally Matitaputty, Merlien Irene Mustamu, Julista Natanel Lainsamputty Nendissa, Renny Heronia Nirahua, Garciano Nur Tanachi Mardan Pattipawae, Dezonda Rosiana Picauly, Benjami Carel Pietersz, Jemmy Jefry Puru, Silvia Yuniwati Rumalean, Suwardi Sahertian, Chelsy Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua Salmon, Hendrik Samangun, Warnesy Atayen Sedubun, Victor Juzuf Sherlock H Lekipiouw Singkery, Michael Rolando Soplanit, Miracle Suneth, Safar Supusepa, Reimon Suwakul, Rian Tanda, Nunung Ramadan Tanner, Juliani Tomagola, Jihan Tomia, Niati