Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pelaksanaan Ganti Rugi Akibat Pembebasan Hak Atas Tanah Menurut Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pengadaan Tanah bagi Kepentingan Umum Evangelista, Beverly; Febriana, Asyri
AHKAM Vol 2 No 2 (2023): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v2i2.1473

Abstract

The authority of the State in the acquisition of land rights for the public interest in Indonesia is derived from the State's Right to Control. Because of that, on the basis of that authority, the state has the right to take over citizens' land with the provision of providing proper compensation. To provide legality for this authority, the State issued Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Procurement for Public Interests. Implementation of Forms of Compensation according to Law no. 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Development for the Public Interest, clearly states that Compensation is a proper and fair compensation to the entitled party in the land acquisition process. Assessment of the value of Compensation is carried out plot per plot of land, including: land, above-ground and underground space, buildings, plants, objects related to land, and other losses that can be assessed. Based on the assessment of the amount of Compensation, the provision of Compensation can be given in the form of: money, replacement land, resettlement, share ownership and other forms.
Juridical Analysis of Default Disputes in Online Loan Agreements under the Indonesian Civil Code Febriana, Asyri; Utary, Baiq Ishariaty Wika; Idrus, Nabain
Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Vol 20 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Volume 20 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35879/jik.v20i1.704

Abstract

The development of electronic transactions has created ambiguity in the mechanisms for resolving disputes arising from breaches of contract (wanprestasi) in online lending agreements. This study aims to analyse the juridical basis for resolving breach of contract disputes based on the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). The method used is normative juridical, with a statutory and literature approach. The results of the study indicate that online agreements remain valid under Article 1320 of the Civil Code and possess binding legal force; therefore, breaches of contract can be legally enforced. However, the digital nature of online lending agreements presents its own challenges, particularly in terms of dispute resolution mechanisms. The novelty of this research lies in analysing the relationship between the characteristics of electronic agreements and the models of dispute resolution for breach of contract. This study contributes by providing a more specific juridical framework as a basis for the development of practices and policies in resolving disputes arising from online agreements.