Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Legal Analysis of Red Notices in the Handling of Wanted Persons (DPO) Cases in Indonesia: A Study Based on Law No. 1 of 1979 on Extradition (Articles 2, 3, 4, 5), and Police Regulation No. 1 of 2020 on the Functions of the NCB -Interpol Indonesia, with the Case of Fugitive Former Investree CEO Adrian Gunadi as the Focus Idrus, Nabain; Bunyamin, Ilham Akbar; Andiani, Paramita
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 3 No. 04 (2025): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v3i04.2321

Abstract

This study examines the legal framework and implementation of Red Notices in handling fugitive cases (Daftar Pencarian Orang – DPO) in Indonesia, with a particular focus on the case of the former CEO of Investree, Adrian Gunadi. Using a normative legal analysis, the research explores the application of Law Number 1 of 1979 concerning Extradition (Articles 2, 3, 4, and 5) and Police Regulation Number 1 of 2020 concerning the Functions of the NCB–Interpol Indonesia. The findings reveal that the Red Notice serves as a crucial tool for international law enforcement cooperation but lacks the status of a binding arrest warrant under Indonesian law. Its execution depends on the harmonization between national legal sovereignty and international obligations. The study also identifies legal and institutional challenges, such as procedural inconsistencies, limited inter-agency coordination, and inadequate bilateral extradition treaties, which hinder effective implementation. The case of Adrian Gunadi highlights these weaknesses, demonstrating the need for stronger regulatory mechanisms, enhanced cooperation between NCB–Interpol Indonesia and foreign counterparts, and policy reforms to ensure due process and accountability. Overall, this research underscores the importance of integrating Red Notice practices into Indonesia’s legal framework to improve the pursuit and extradition of fugitives within the boundaries of both domestic and international law.
Strategi Pemerintah Indonesia dalam Pemberantasan Praktik Judi Online: Analisis Deskriptif Pahrijal, Rival; Triyantoro, Andri; Idrus, Nabain
Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Vol 3 No 02 (2024): Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jhhws.v3i02.1357

Abstract

Proliferasi perjudian online menimbulkan tantangan yang signifikan bagi pemerintah di seluruh dunia, termasuk Indonesia, di mana norma-norma budaya dan kerangka hukum dengan tegas melarang kegiatan perjudian. Makalah ini memberikan analisis normatif tentang strategi pemerintah Indonesia dalam memerangi perjudian online, memeriksa kerangka hukum, langkah-langkah penegakan hukum, dampak sosial, pertimbangan etika, dan perspektif komparatif. Meskipun ada larangan yang ketat, perjudian online tetap ada karena kemajuan teknologi dan operasi transnasional. Analisis ini menyoroti dilema etika dalam menyeimbangkan kebebasan individu dengan kesejahteraan masyarakat dan merekomendasikan pendekatan regulasi yang lebih baik untuk mengurangi bahaya sosial sambil menjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai budaya. Dengan mengevaluasi lanskap regulasi Indonesia dalam konteks global, studi ini memberikan kontribusi wawasan tentang strategi tata kelola yang efektif untuk mengatasi praktik perjudian online.
Juridical Analysis of Default Disputes in Online Loan Agreements under the Indonesian Civil Code Febriana, Asyri; Utary, Baiq Ishariaty Wika; Idrus, Nabain
Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Vol 20 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Volume 20 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35879/jik.v20i1.704

Abstract

The development of electronic transactions has created ambiguity in the mechanisms for resolving disputes arising from breaches of contract (wanprestasi) in online lending agreements. This study aims to analyse the juridical basis for resolving breach of contract disputes based on the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). The method used is normative juridical, with a statutory and literature approach. The results of the study indicate that online agreements remain valid under Article 1320 of the Civil Code and possess binding legal force; therefore, breaches of contract can be legally enforced. However, the digital nature of online lending agreements presents its own challenges, particularly in terms of dispute resolution mechanisms. The novelty of this research lies in analysing the relationship between the characteristics of electronic agreements and the models of dispute resolution for breach of contract. This study contributes by providing a more specific juridical framework as a basis for the development of practices and policies in resolving disputes arising from online agreements.