Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Tasfiyah Idrak: Journal of Islamic Education
Ma'afi, Rif'at Husnul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
MUSYKILĀT ISTIKHDĀM AL-ṬARĪQAH AL-MUBĀSYIRAH FĪ TA’LĪM AL-MUṬĀLA’AH WA ḤULŪLUHĀ Ma'afi, Rif'at Husnul; Salma, Ria Fauziah
Idrak: Journal of Islamic Education Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Vol.2, No.1, 2019
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah (STIT) Ar-Raudlatul Hasanah, Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (353.412 KB)

Abstract

Muthala?ah is one of the most influential lessons in teaching Arabic Language, especially at the Islamic Boarding School Darussalam Gontor. This Institute used the direct method of teaching Muthala?ah. But the application of it was not complete and problems emerged. The aim of this research is to uncover the problems of using the direct method in teaching Muthala?ah and their solutions for students of class one intensive at Islamic Teachers Training College Darussalam Gontor for Girls First Campus academic year 1438-1439. There were problems of using the direct method of teaching Muthala?ah for students of class one intensive came from the teachers and the students as the pupils who do the educational process. But, because of the important of enough Arabic Language knowledge? students, they need the responsible of branches as their Arabic Language teacher outside classroom. So, the solutions of the problems came to teachers, students and responsible of branches
Qadiyyah Ru’yatillāh fī al-Ākhirah Inda Al-Qādī ‘Abdul Jabbār wa Abī al-Hasan al-‘Asy’arī: The Issue of Seeing God in the Hereafter according to Al-Qādī ‘Abdul Jabbār wa Abī al-Hasan al-‘Asy’arī Ma'afi, Rif'at Husnul; Adi Yatma, Rahmadani
Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : University of Darussalam Gontor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tasfiyah.v8i1.11668

Abstract

This article discusses the debate on the issue of ru'yatullah between Abu Hasan Al-Asy'ari who said that seeing God is something that is possible, this statement was then opposed by Alqadhi Abdul Jabbar he argued that it was something impossible, even though they used the same arguments for their respective opinions, and each of them has an interpretation of the verse. This incident happened because there were no definite arguments about the possibility of seeing God or not in the afterlife. Therefore, the dichotomy between groups in this discussion does not drop the status of infidels for those who disagree with them. This article uses a type of literature review with an aqidah approach and the method used is a descriptive method and an inductive method, and a comparative method to compare the two understandings and reveal some similarities and differences in their understanding. The result is that the researchers found several methods used by Al-Qadhi Abdul Jabbar in discussing Aqidah, namely prioritizing reason rather than naql, making reason as a proposition, rejecting khabar wahid and using arguments from ta'wil al kalamiy. Meanwhile, the method of Abu Hasan Al-Asy'ari in discussing the issue of Aqidah is mediating between naql and reason, using aqli arguments, accepting ta'wil al kalamiy. The view of Al-Qadhi Abdul Jabbar in ru'yatullah is of the opinion that Allah cannot be seen in this world or in the hereafter, in contrast to Abu Hasan Al-Ash'ari according to him the meaning of the word ru'yah is to know the knowledge and power of Allah, they believe that the people The believer will see his Lord on the Day of Resurrection even if he does not know how. Not through the ability to see that is found in the ordinary eye, but with the ability that is bestowed by Allah Swt.
Muqāranah Afkār al-Tawḥīd ‘inda al-Syaikh ‘Abd al-Jabbār wa Abī al-Ḥasan al-‘Asy’arī Ma'afi, Rif'at Husnul; Al Faruqi, Achmad Reza Hutama; Taufiqurrahman, Azhar; Chaidir, Ahmad
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 23, No 2 (2024): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v23i2.27237

Abstract

This article discusses Tauhid by two prominent mutakallim figures, namely al-Qāḍī ‘Abd al-Jabbār and al-‘Ash’arī using literature review and analytical and comparative methods. These two figures have similarities and differences in the concept of tauhid. ‘Abd al-Jabbār denies the azaliyah qualities that Allah has attached to Himself, because pinning these qualities to Allah will have an impact on divine dualism, and will also plunge a person into tajsim and tasybih, so he sees that Allah's nature is in essence, God himself. This statement was then opposed by al-Ash’arī, arguing that the nature of Allah is not His essence and nothing else, it means that the attributes of Allah are qadim. This is what the Mu’tazilah denied because it causes the number of qadim to be counted. The results of this study conclude that they agree on the oneness of Allah and provide evidence for it, refute things that lead to tasybih and tajsim, and takyif against Allah SWT. In addition, denying the possibility of seeing Allah in the world, and believing that Allah has the nature of kalam even though they differ in defining these attributes. While the difference between these two figures, first is in terms of their manhaj in determining aqidah. Second, in interpreting monotheism, the relationship between essence and nature, the nature of faith, interpretation of mutasyabih verses, the word of God, ru’yatullah in the hereafter.
Muqāranah Afkār al-Tawḥīd ‘inda al-Syaikh ‘Abd al-Jabbār wa Abī al-Ḥasan al-‘Asy’arī Ma'afi, Rif'at Husnul; Al Faruqi, Achmad Reza Hutama; Taufiqurrahman, Azhar; Chaidir, Ahmad
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v23i2.27237

Abstract

This article discusses Tauhid by two prominent mutakallim figures, namely al-Qāḍī ‘Abd al-Jabbār and al-‘Ash’arī using literature review and analytical and comparative methods. These two figures have similarities and differences in the concept of tauhid. ‘Abd al-Jabbār denies the azaliyah qualities that Allah has attached to Himself, because pinning these qualities to Allah will have an impact on divine dualism, and will also plunge a person into tajsim and tasybih, so he sees that Allah's nature is in essence, God himself. This statement was then opposed by al-Ash’arī, arguing that the nature of Allah is not His essence and nothing else, it means that the attributes of Allah are qadim. This is what the Mu’tazilah denied because it causes the number of qadim to be counted. The results of this study conclude that they agree on the oneness of Allah and provide evidence for it, refute things that lead to tasybih and tajsim, and takyif against Allah SWT. In addition, denying the possibility of seeing Allah in the world, and believing that Allah has the nature of kalam even though they differ in defining these attributes. While the difference between these two figures, first is in terms of their manhaj in determining aqidah. Second, in interpreting monotheism, the relationship between essence and nature, the nature of faith, interpretation of mutasyabih verses, the word of God, ru’yatullah in the hereafter.
Co-Authors Achmad Reza Hutama Al Faruqi Adi Yatma, Rahmadani Ahmad Chaidir Salma, Ria Fauziah Taufiqurrahman, Azhar