Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Aspirasi : Jurnal Masalah-masalah Sosial Law Development Journal
Iskandar, Indra
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Strategi Komunikasi Krisis DPR RI Menggunakan Instagram Menghadapi Penolakan RUU Cipta Kerja Iskandar, Indra; Hidayat, Dadang Rahmat; Priyatna, Centurion Chandratama
Jurnal Aspirasi Vol 12, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46807/aspirasi.v12i2.2413

Abstract

The following study analyzes the social media strategy of the DPR RI’s Instagram facing the rejection of the Job Creation Bill on social media. The rejection on social media using hashtags #TolakOmnibusLaw Job Creation. The study uses Coombs situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) model as a framework for understanding and suggesting future crisis communication strategies using social media selections. The result from this research shows that the DPR RI’s Instagram is an effective tool for monitoring and engaging public discourse during the #TolakOmnibusLaw Job Creation crisis. This study explores the ideas presented by the DPR RI’s Instagram on 14 April 2020, the first time the Job Creation Bill was discussed until President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo officially signed the Job Creation Bill into Law No. 11 of 2020 on November 2, 2020. From the data collected, this research found 17 posts related to the Job Creation Bill. From the analysis of 17 posts, this study concludes that the dominant strategy from the DPR RI Instagram is denial. Denial strategy with denial tactics based on the SCCT Coombs theory is an effective strategy in facing many hoaxes in the Job Creation Bill’s crisis.Abstrak:Studi ini menganalisis strategi media sosial pada masa krisis yang harus dihadapi DPR RI akibat adanya penolakan pengesahan Rancangan Undang-Undang (RUU) Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang (UU) yang terjadi di media sosial. Penolakan tersebut dilancarkan dengan menggunakan #TolakOmnibusLaw. Studi ini menggunakan situational crisis communication theory (SCCT), model yang digagas oleh Coombs sebagai kerangka berpikir untuk memahami dan merekomendasikan strategi komunikasi krisis menggunakan media sosial dengan studi kasus terhadap akun Instagram DPR RI. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akun Instagram DPR RI menjadi alat yang efektif untuk memonitor dan meng-engage perbincangan publik pada masa krisis #TolakOmnibusLaw. Studi ini menganalisis gagasan yang ada pada unggahan akun Instagram DPR RI mulai 14 April 2020 yang merupakan tanggal RUU Cipta Kerja pertama kali dibahas di DPR RI hingga saat Presiden Joko “Jokowi” Widodo menandatangani UU No.11 Tahun 2020 pada 2 November 2020. Berdasarkan pengumpulan data diperoleh 17 unggahan terkait dengan RUU Cipta Kerja. Dari hasil analisis terhadap ke-17 unggahan disimpulkan bahwa strategi dominan dari akun  resmi Instagram DPR RI dalam menghadapi penolakan terhadap RUU Cipta Kerja adalah denial. Strategi denial dengan taktik denial berdasarkan teori SCCT Coombs merupakan strategi yang efektif menghadapi banyaknya hoaks dalam krisis yang disebabkan penolakan pengesahan RUU Cipta Kerja menjadi UU.
The Prosecutor's Authority to Conduct Investigations into Corruption Crimes Causing State Financial Losses (Case Study in PT. Timah Tbk) Iskandar, Indra; Siregar, Hamdan Azhar
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.3.392-402

Abstract

The performance of the prosecutor's office in eradicating corruption is seen in the case of PT. Timah Tbk. Starting from the alleged corruption of the tin commodity trade system in the Mining Business Permit (IUP) area of PT Timah Tbk for 2015-2022, where the total loss reached IDR 271 trillion. In the process of enforcing the law on corruption in Indonesia, there are investigators from three institutions established by the state in their capacity as law enforcement officers who have been given authority to each investigator through law. The authority of investigation by the prosecutor's office is regulated in Law 16 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No. 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Based on the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 28/PUU-V/2007 states that Article 30 paragraph (1) letter d of the Prosecutor's Office Law which gives the Prosecutor's Office authority other than prosecution, namely to conduct investigations, does not necessarily contradict the 1945 Constitution. Investigations carried out by the Prosecutor's Office are crimes that are difficult to resolve, such as corruption. The obstacles encountered by prosecutors in investigations are the authority held by investigators as regulated in Article 5 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely to seek information and evidence. At this stage, investigators must be as capable as possible of seeking and finding assets belonging to perpetrators of corruption.
Co-Authors Ary Setyawan Centurion Chandratama Priyatna, Centurion Chandratama Dadang Rahmat Hidayat Legowo, Slamet Jauhari Siregar, Hamdan Azhar