Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Protection for Disabilities Persons with Language Limitations in Law Enforcement Barid, Vera Bararah; Indriyani, Dewi Analis; Yulianti, Yeni; Putra, Sri Gilang Muhammad Sultan Rahma; Utami, Penny Naluria
Jurnal HAM Vol 13, No 3 (2022): December Edition
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (927.552 KB) | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2022.13.631-645

Abstract

The Indonesian government has enacted various regulations aimed at protecting individuals with disabilities, yet significant gaps persist in their implementation. Discrimination against people with disabilities, particularly those with language impairments, remains prevalent, especially within the legal system. This study employs a sociolegal approach to examine the challenges faced by disabled individuals with language limitations in accessing legal protection. Key aspects analyzed include existing regulatory frameworks for disability protection, case studies of legal decisions involving disabilities, the handling of legal proceedings, challenges encountered by stakeholders in legal cases, and the impact of limited access to sign language and legal knowledge. The research reveals that individuals with hearing impairments often struggle to exercise their rights to assistance from sign language interpreters during legal proceedings. This deficiency is primarily attributed to a lack of awareness and understanding among various stakeholders regarding the specific needs of people with hearing impairments. Furthermore, the effectiveness of law enforcement processes for disabled individuals is hindered by regional variations in sign language, the existence of informal or non-standardized sign languages, and the limited proficiency of law enforcement personnel in communicating with and accommodating individuals with disabilities. In conclusion, the study underscores the urgent need for improved implementation of existing disability rights regulations in Indonesia, particularly within the legal context. Addressing these challenges requires enhancing awareness and training among legal professionals and stakeholders, ensuring consistent access to qualified sign language interpreters, and promoting standardized approaches to accommodating individuals with disabilities in legal proceedings. By bridging these gaps, Indonesia can move closer to fulfilling its commitment to upholding the rights and dignity of all individuals, including those with disabilities, within its legal system.
LEGAL RECONSTRUCTION OF IMPLEMENTATION LEGALLY BINDING VERDICT IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT Putra, Sri Gilang Muhammad Sultan Rahma
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 9 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.99-115

Abstract

The existence of industrial relations courts until now still can not provide adequate legal protection to justice seekers. This article begins with the existing legal problems in the form of not implemented legally binding of industrial relations court verdicts. The unapplied verdicts have resulted in the exclusion of the rights of justice seekers. This paper identifies the problem related to normative perspective and provide solutions through legal reconstruction from the normative view. Then, the problems are examined using normative legal research methods based on statute approach and historical approach as well as case approach. By examining several research results it is known that the legal vacuum which regulates sanctions against those who do not intend to enforce industrial relations court rulings that have legal force still need to be addressed immediately to guarantee the rights of the seekers of justice in the industrial relations court. This paper recommends to establish a Supreme Court Regulation on the implementation of institutional force on industrial relations disputes cases and the need for amendment of Law Number 2 Year 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement.