Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Reviewing Criminal Law on Illegal Broadcasting of Paid Football Shows: Mola TV Case Study Kasim, Muhammad Rinaldy; Karim, M. Said; Judhariksawan, Judhariksawan
Journal of Development Research Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Volume 8, Number 2, November 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28926/jdr.v8i2.378

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the criminal law regulations regarding the handling of illegal broadcasting actions in paid football shows and to assess the legal status of providers of illegal broadcasting services based on criminal law provisions. The research employs a normative legal method by examining the application of positive legal norms. It consists of normative legal research that utilizes secondary data collection and analysis, as well as empirical legal research that involves obtaining and analysing primary data through interviews with relevant sources. The findings are then analysed qualitatively and systematically organized. The results of the study indicate that (1) the criminal law regulations for addressing illegal broadcasting actions in paid football shows are established in various legislative provisions, including Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright, Law No. 19 of 2016 on Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions, and the principles found in Law No. 32 of 2002 on Broadcasting. Despite these regulations, numerous violations still occur. (2) The legal status of organizers of illegal broadcasts who engage in watching/providing/distributing illegal broadcasts violates the applicable regulations. This situation arises because subscription fees charged by Mola TV, the license holder, are still considered expensive, even though the public is generally aware of the relevant legal provisions concerning activities related to watching/providing/distributing illegal broadcasts.
The Politics of Criminal Law Behind the Mining Industry’s Image: Uncovering CSR Scandals in Indonesia Basrawi, Basrawi; Karim, M. Said; Ilmar, Aminuddin
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i1.14464

Abstract

Corporate branding through Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs has become a key strategy for many mining companies in Indonesia. CSR is supposed to be a tangible manifestation of a company’s contribution to social and environmental development around its area of operation. However, in practice, CSR is often just an image tool to improve the company’s reputation without having a significant positive impact on society. This article examines the phenomenon of CSR in the Indonesian mining sector, which is often involved in scandals and manipulative practices. The research highlights various cases where mining companies fail to fulfill their social responsibilities, manipulate CSR reports, and exploit local communities. Through a qualitative analysis approach, this article reveals that CSR programs in the mining sector are more often used as a means to improve public image than to make a real contribution to sustainable development. The conclusion of this study shows the need for supervisory reforms and clear rules related to criminal sanctions for misuse of CSR funds so that CSR implementation does not only become a means of imaging, but actually has a positive sustainable impact.
Disparitas Pemidanaan dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Jaya, Muhammad Indra; Karim, M. Said; Muchtar, Syamsuddin
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024): Al-Mizan (e-Journal)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/am.v20i1.3943

Abstract

This study aims to analyze legal factors and factors of law enforcement officials that influence the disparity in sentencing for corruption which results in state losses. The type of research used is empirical normative legal research. The results of the study show that (1) the legal factor in the presence of disparity decisions regarding corruption crimes has not been optimal because the minimum criminal sanctions in the corruption law cause disparity in sentencing which is quite disturbing due to the non-uniformity in the provision of minimum sentences for similar offenses. (2) the factor of law enforcement officials as the cause of the disparity in sentencing of corruption case decisions is very clearly seen and felt to be very unfair to each other, there is no clear guideline regarding the prevention of disparity in corruption criminal rulings so law enforcement officers exercise their power to decide similar offenses the pretext of the judicial power law.