Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Metode K-Nearest Neighbor Dan Naive Bayes Dalam Menentukan Status Gizi Balita Pratama, Junius; Fauziah, F; Sholihati, Ira Diana
Brahmana : Jurnal Penerapan Kecerdasan Buatan Vol 4, No 2 (2023): Edisi Juni
Publisher : LPPM STIKOM Tunas Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30645/brahmana.v4i2.197

Abstract

The nutritional intake needed by toddlers during the growth period for each individual has a different amount of consumption, therefore a process of checking nutritional status must be carried out. The indicators high and weight that will be calculated in determining the nutritional status. Until now the process of it status children under five is still carried out manually, resulting in the classification process of nutritional not being as expected. It is difficult for parents to go to the health center to check on their child's condition because the location is far from where they live and the administrative process is long. The propose is website-based information system, as well as providing recommendations on which method is the most accurate among K-Nearest Neighbors and Naïve Bayes in determining the nutritional status of toddlers. The results of this study have succeeded in creating an information system that can be used by users by inputting condition criteria for the process of classifying the nutritional status of toddlers. Naïve Bayes method is superior with a percentage value of 87.5% while the K-Nearest Neighbor method with k = 3 has an accuracy percentage of 71.25%
ANALISIS PENERAPAN PRINSIP PREJUDICIEL GESCHILL DALAM PUTUSAN SELA PENGADILAN NEGERI BEKASI NOMOR: 1242/Pid.B/2018/PN.Bks Tanggal 19 November 2018 Utami, Nur Agustina; Fadillah, Syarif; fauziah, F
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Perkembangan Hukum Pidana dan Penegakannya
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (559.443 KB) | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v2i1.17

Abstract

The judge as the part that decides on the case plays a very important role in determining thefuture of the law, because each judge's decision will become the center of public attention. Thejudge does not only act as a mouthpiece of the law, but the judge also acts as the inventor of the law (recht vinding). The exercise of the authority of judges in criminal proceedings in law enforcement should uphold the principles that apply in the Criminal Procedure Code in court and benefit justice seekers. in the development of criminal procedure law in Indonesia,specifically regulating the postponement of criminal proceedings related to civil cases or socalled prejudiciel geschil in Indonesia, is regulated in Article 81 of the Criminal Code whichstipulates that "Postponement of criminal prosecution develops with judicial disputes, delaysexpired ". However, if examined closely, it seems that the provisions of Article 81 of theCriminal Code only link prayer disputes with expiration, but not explicitly which will takeprecedence when civil and criminal cases are brought to court at the same time. Theunregulated court dispute has clearly made the legal vacuum (rechtsvacuum) related toprejudicieel geschil, as well as lead to dualism in judicial practices in Indonesia.