Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Konstruksi Melalui Arbitrase Arief, Ediyanto; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Sami’an, Sami’an
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i4.4329

Abstract

Kontrak konstruksi memiliki dua aspek yang penting untuk dipelajari yaitu aspek legal dan aspek bisnis.  Aspek legal dalam kontrak konstruksi berkaitan juga dengan aspek pengakhiran perjanjian/pemutusan kontrak, penghentian sementara pekerjaan (suspension of work), penyelesaian sengketa (dispute of settlement), bahasa yang berlaku (the rulling language), serta addendum dan amandemen kontrak. Pada Undang-Undang No 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi Pasal 88, diatur mengenai penyelesaian sengketa konstruksi. Tahapan penyelesaian sengketa dengan cara : a. mediasi, b. konsiliasi, c. arbitrase. Selain 3 (tiga) tahapan ini, untuk mediasi dan konsiliasi bisa digantikan dengan membentuk dewan sengketa (dispute board). Permasalahannya adalah (1) Mengapa terjadinya sengketa pada jasa konstruksi ? (2) Bagaimana kepastian hukum penyelesaian sengketa konstruksi yang melalui Arbitrase ?. Metode pendekatan menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dan sosiologis atau socio normative legal research. Teori-teori hukum yang digunakan diantaranya teori keadilan, teori sistem hukum dan teori perjanjian. Kesimpulan, (1) penyebab sengketa pada urutan pertama dikarenakan kontraktor terlambat menyelesaikan pekerjaan, (2) Pembatalan putusan arbitrase membuat tidak adanya kepastian hukum dari putusan arbitrase yang bersifat final dan mengikat.
Legal Protection For Consumers Buying And Selling Electronic Goods With Defective Products Arief, Ediyanto; Nurdin, Boy; Budianto, Azis
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 4 No. 05 (2023): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v4i05.823

Abstract

Abstract. The presence of Regulation Number 8 of 1999 concerning Purchaser Insurance has concentrated a little since this Regulation controls the privileges and commitments of business entertainers and customers so they are safer and are supposed to turn into a legitimate umbrella for shoppers. Consumers need to know that they have the right to get protection when dealing with sellers or producers in conducting trade transactions so that when a loss occurs on the part of the consumer caused by the seller or producer, the consumer can demand that the seller or producer be responsible for the loss suffered by the consumer. The relationship between sellers as business actors to consumers must be maintained properly. The seller also knows whether there is anything to consider before being marketed or sent to consumers regarding the feasibility of the goods. The eligibility in question is the condition of the goods by the information submitted by the seller, according to what is in the advertisement, the seller has ethics when trading his goods. At the point when a misfortune is capable by the shopper, on the off chance that the proof states whether there was a component of mistake, it stays the obligation of the merchant, as expressed in Article 28 of Regulation Number 8 of 1999 concerning Customer Security.