Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.633
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties EKONOMIKA SYARIAH : Journal of Economic Studies Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Al Ushuliy JUMANDIK Jurnal Manajemen & Pendidikan
Nofiardi, Nofiardi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Al Ushuliy

 1 
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE VERDICTS OF THE BUKITTINGGI RELIGIOUS COURT AND THE PADANG HIGH RELIGIOUS COURT ON CHILD CUSTODY FROM THE MASHLAHAH PERSPECTIVE siadio, sidiq; Nofiardi, Nofiardi
Al Ushuliy: Jurnal Mahasiswa Syariah dan Hukum Vol 3, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31958/alushuliy.v3i2.13210

Abstract

Child custody disputes are common in Indonesia, particularly among public figures such as Virgoun and Inara, as well as Larissa Chou and Alvin Faiz. Economic instability, exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic, has significantly impacted mothers' ability to care for their children. In Minangkabau, the matrilineal system typically grants custody to the mother, as reflected in the PTA Padang decision, which contrasts with the ruling from PA Bukittinggi. Islamic law generally grants the mother the right to child maintenance after divorce until the child reaches the age of tamyiz. This study examines the child custody decisions of PA Bukittinggi and PTA Padang through the lens of mashlahah, assessing which ruling best serves the child's welfare. Using normative legal research methodology, the study analyzes primary data from PTA Padang Decision No. 62/Pdt.G/2022/PTA.Pdg, PA Bukittinggi Decision No. 621/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Bkt, and interviews with judges. The findings reveal significant differences in the legal reasoning and interpretation of the child’s best interests between the two courts.
Co-Authors Alwana, Hanif Aidhil Busyro, Busyro Habib, Fakhry Emil Helmy, Muhammad Irfan Ismail Ismail siadio, sidiq Wadi, Fajrul