Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pranata Hukum Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Sosial dan Teknologi (SNISTEK)
Adri, Saidil
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENENTUAN KRITERIA DELIK ADAT OLEH MASYARAKAT ADAT MELAYU ROKAN HILIR Adri, Saidil
Jurnal Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2020): PANJI KEADILAN Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36085/jpk.v3i1.1209

Abstract

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan Untuk mengetahui penentuan kriteria delik adat oleh masyarakat adat melayu Rokan Hilir. Salah satu daerah yang ada di provinsi Riau yang memiliki masyarakat adat yakni kabupaten Rokan Hilir, dalam masyarakat adat melayu Rokan Hilir memiliki cara pandang berbeda dalam menentukan apakah suatu perbuatan masuk dalam kategori perbuatan tercela, atau disebut dengan istilah delik adat. Dalam perumusannya, yang menjadi acuan dalam proses apakah suatu perbuatan masuk dalam delik adat ada ukuran yang menjadi dasar penilaian atau penetapan sesuatu yang disebut dengan kriteria. Penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian sosiologis yuridis, yaitu studi-studi empiris untuk menemukan teori-teori mengenai proses terjadinya dan mengenai proses bekerjanya hukum dalam masyarakat. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis kualitatif yaitu uraian yang dilakukan terhadap data yang terkumpul dengan menggunakan kualitas dari data atau tidak menggunakan angka-angka tetapi berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendapat pukar hukum. Selanjutnya peneliti menerangkan dengan jelas dan rinci melalui interpretasi data dengan menghubungkan keterkaitan data yang satu dengan yang lainnya dan dianalisa berdasarkan teori hukum maupun ketentuan hukum yang berlaku dan pendapat para ahli, untuk kemudian menarik kesimpulan dengan cara deduktif yakni penarikan kesimpulan dari hal-hal yang bersifat umum ke masalah yang bersifat khusus.Kata kunci: kriteria; delik adat; masyarakat adat; melayu rokan hilirABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the determination of the criteria for customary offense by the indigenous people of Malay Rokan Hilir. One of the regions in Riau province that has indigenous peoples is Rokan Hilir district. In the adat community, Malay Rokan Hilir has a different perspective in determining whether an act is categorized as a despicable act, or referred to as adat delik. In the formulation, which becomes a reference in the process of whether an act is included in the adat offense there is a measure on which to base an assessment or determination of something called a criterion. This research is a type of juridical sociological research, namely empirical studies to find theories about the process of occurrence and about the process of working of law in society. The method of approach used in this study is a qualitative analysis that is a description of the data collected using the quality of the data or not using numbers but based on laws and regulations and legal exchange opinions. Furthermore, researchers explain clearly and in detail through data interpretation by linking the data linkages with one another and analyzed based on legal theory and applicable legal provisions and opinions of experts, to then draw conclusions by deductive means of drawing conclusions from things that are of a nature general to specific problems.Keywords: criteria; customary delict; culture; rokan hilir malay
ISRAELI–IRANIAN MISSILE TERRITORIAL VIOLATIONS IN THE AIRSPACE OF SYRIA: A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Kaloko, Ilhamda Fattah; Harmain, Irfan; Adri, Saidil; Putra, Rian Rusmana
PRANATA HUKUM Vol. 20 No. 2 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Law Faculty of Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/pranatahukum.v20i2.415

Abstract

The armed conflict between Israel and Iran, involving cross-border missile launches through Syrian airspace, presents complex challenges under international law. This study analyzes the legal implications of such violations, focusing on state sovereignty, state responsibility, and the justification of force under Article 51 of the UN Charter. Using a normative juridical method, the research evaluates the effectiveness of international legal instruments such as the UN Charter, the 1944 Chicago Convention, and the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA) 2001 in addressing modern aerial threats involving third-party states. The findings reveal a legal vacuum regarding the regulation of long-range missiles and armed drones, often exploited by powerful states to avoid accountability. Syria, a neutral state in the Israel-Iran conflict, has suffered civilian casualties and sovereignty violations without effective international legal remedies. Furthermore, the self-defense justifications put forward by both Israel and Iran fail to meet the criteria of necessity and proportionality and infringe upon the principle of non-intervention. The weak response from the international community exacerbated by the UN Security Council’s inaction and ICAO’s limited mandate underscores the urgent need for legal reform. This study advocates for the enhancement of international institutional mandates, the development of additional protocols on aerial warfare, and the ratification of ARSIWA to strengthen legal accountability and protect third-state airspace in armed conflict.
Permasalahan dalam Optimalisasi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah yang Efektif dan Efisien Adri, Saidil
Prosiding Vol 6 (2024): SNISTEK
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Putera Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Procurement of goods/services is an activity of procuring goods/services carried out by Ministries/Regional Apparatus Institutions funded by the APBN/APBD through several processes. The size of the government budget used in procurement of goods/services, namely around 40%, will influence government spending and government work programs. The purpose of writing this article is to find out the problems in the process of procuring goods and services. This research is a library research, where the data that supports the study comes from library sources in the form of books, encyclopedias, journals, magazines, newspapers, and so on. The results of this research article are that regulations relating to PBJ are still weak, especially in the implementation mechanisms, so that the quality of the goods produced is not appropriate, there is corruption, collusion and nepotism (KKN) between officials and providers, which are still often found in making plans, there is a lack of clarity between needs. vs desires, the problem with determining goods/services is that it does not take into account the BMN inventory so that it has an impact on wasting resources, budget and RUP, the supporting budget is not enough, this will have an impact on activities being hampered, and PBJ targets being hampered, and the implementation of the election not being utilized effectively. maximum for clarification and equalizing perceptions, this will have an impact on failed tenders and public distrust
Co-Authors Irfan Harmain Kaloko, Ilhamda Fattah Putra, Rian Rusmana