Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial budaya SOSIOLOGI NUSANTARA SIMBOL : Jurnal Administrasi Publik dan Pemerintahan
Jendrius
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Environmental Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : SOSIOLOGI NUSANTARA

 1 
Implementasi Prinsip Perlindungan Perempuan Korban Kekerasan: Studi di UPTD PPA Sumatera Barat A.Fernandos; Jendrius; Lucky Zamzami
Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara Vol 11 No 1 (2025): Vol 11 No.1
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsn.11.1.145-163

Abstract

Violence against women continues to be a significant issue that calls for decisive government action. In response, the Indonesian government established the Regional Technical Implementation Unit for the Protection of Women and Children (UPTD PPA) through PPPA Regulation Number 4 of 2018. The West Sumatra Provincial Government has formed UPTD PPA to provide protection services for women victims of violence. However, challenges remain in aligning the implementation of these services with the protection principles mandated in the national legal framework. This study aims to describe how the UPTD PPA of West Sumatra Province applies the principles of protection in handling cases of violence against women. Data were gathered using a qualitative descriptive approach through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis. The research informants consisted of five officers from the UPTD PPA of West Sumatra Province. Data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model, which involves data coding, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that the implementation of the principles of non-discrimination and the best interests of the victim is nearly ideal. However, gender equality has not been fully realized. The principle of justice is fully aligned with the legal basis, while the principle of recovery is only partially so.
Meaning of Being Siri Wife in a Poligamous Marriage Nisa, Mufidatunnisa; Jendrius; Indraddin
Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara Vol 11 No 1 (2025): Vol 11 No.1
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsn.11.1.38-60

Abstract

Second wives in siri polygamous marriages frequently face a legal inequality, social stigma, and cultural pressure. Interestingly, many siri wives do not necessarily perceive their position negatively. On the contrary, they are able to construct positive meanings through their experiences and social interactions. This study aims to identify the meanings constructed by siri wives regarding their position in polygamous marriages, and analyze the adaptive strategies developed by siri wives. This research employs a qualitative approach with data collected through in-depth interviews. The informants consist of five second siri wives. Data analysis was conducted using the Symbolic Interactionism theory by George Herbert Mead. The findings show that siri marriages are perceived as a form of social status recognition, a source of emotional and financial security, and a symbol of the husbands commitment. The status of a siri wife is also seen as a means of gaining affection, escaping loneliness, and attaining flexibility in roles and time. Children born from siri marriages are regarded as a core part of family identity and a primary reason to remain in the marriage. Adaptive strategies include financial independence, emotional detachment from stigma, social participation, and maintaining proper appearance. It is concluded that siri wives construct the meaning of their status not merely based on legal recognition or societal judgment, but through social interaction, self-awareness, and creative negotiation of their position within the reality of polygamous marriage.
KONFLIK PENGELOLAAN TANAH ULAYAT DI NAGARI SUNGAI KAMUYANG: KONFLIK PENGELOLAAN TANAH ULAYAT DI NAGARI SUNGAI KAMUYANG Redni Putri Meldianto; Jendrius; Alfan Miko
Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Vol 10 No.2
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsn.10.2.313-326

Abstract

The conflict over customary land in Nagari Sungai Kamuyang reflects a complex interplay among various actors, including the Kerapatan Adat Nagari (KAN), local leaders, government officials, and external entities such as investors. This study examines the dynamics between these actors and the impact on the resolution of land disputes. A qualitative approach was used, involving in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, including representatives of KAN, local leaders, government officials, and community members. Secondary data were gathered from relevant documents, reports, and previous studies on customary land conflicts in Minangkabau. The findings reveal a significant power imbalance between the local community and external actors, such as the government and investors. The dualism within KAN has further complicated the conflict resolution process, with competing factions influencing decision-making and contributing to a lack of clarity in enforcing customary laws. The government’s policies often conflict with traditional rights, exacerbating tensions. The community faces increasing pressure from external economic interests, threatening their cultural heritage and social structure. The conflict over customary land in Nagari Sungai Kamuyang illustrates the challenges of balancing traditional rights with pressures from modern development. The duality within KAN and the lack of cohesive support from the government hinder effective conflict resolution. An inclusive approach involving constructive dialogue and recognising customary and modern legal frameworks is crucial for achieving a fair and sustainable resolution. Resolving the customary land conflict in Nagari Sungai Kamuyang requires addressing the power imbalances, bridging gaps between traditional and modern legal systems, and ensuring that community voices are adequately represented in decision-making processes.
Co-Authors A.Fernandos Asril, A. Fernandos Damsar Fachrina Fachrina Indraddin Lucky Zamzami Miko, Alfan Nisa, Mufidatunnisa Redni Putri Meldianto Wahyu Pramono