Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Legal Framework of General Visit Visa for Foreign Workers in Indonesia: Kerangka Hukum Visa Kunjungan Umum untuk Pekerja Asing di Indonesia Islam, Muhammad Alif N; Muis, Lidya Shery
Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review Vol. 26 No. 4 (2025): October
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijppr.v26i4.1459

Abstract

General Background: The movement of foreign workers across national borders has become increasingly common, requiring countries to regulate their entry and employment. Specific Background: In Indonesia, the implementation of work and visit visas for foreign workers is regulated under Law No. 6 of 2011 on Immigration and Government Regulation No. 34 of 2021. However, the application of these rules reveals inconsistencies in distinguishing between categories of foreign workers. Knowledge Gap: There is still no clear standard or boundary differentiating foreign workers from candidates undergoing work capability trials under the general visit visa scheme. Aims: This research aims to analyze the legal framework, administrative procedures, and regulatory gaps in the use of general visit visas for foreign workers. Results: Findings indicate the absence of explicit standards and overlapping regulations between work visa and visit visa categories, leading to legal uncertainty. Novelty: This study provides a normative legal perspective emphasizing the necessity for regulatory clarity and structured oversight mechanisms. Implications: The study suggests policy reform to establish transparent standards, ensuring lawful and efficient governance of foreign labor practices in Indonesia. Highlights: Unclear standards create regulatory ambiguity. Legal overlap affects labor governance. Calls for clearer visa differentiation policies. Keywords: Visa Policy, Foreign Workers, Immigration Law, Public Policy, Legal Regulation
Legal Protection for Underage Workers in Indonesia: Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pekerja di Bawah Umur di Indonesia Muis, Lidya Shery; Putri , Auriel Nauvalia
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1351

Abstract

Background: Child labor remains a persistent social and legal issue in Indonesia, challenging the state’s responsibility to protect children’s rights. Specific Background: Despite the existence of the Child Protection Act, many underage workers continue to experience exploitation without adequate legal enforcement. Knowledge Gap: Previous studies have focused on descriptive analyses of legal norms without assessing the practical application and effectiveness of protection mechanisms. Aim: This study aims to examine the legal framework and its implementation regarding the protection of underage workers in Indonesia. Results: The findings reveal that while Indonesia has a comprehensive legal basis, the enforcement is still weak due to limited supervision and social awareness. Novelty: The study provides a new interpretation of normative legal principles by emphasizing the synergy between legal regulations and social practices. Implications: The results highlight the need for stronger policy coordination and legal reinforcement to ensure that child protection laws are not only formal but also effectively implemented at all levels. Highlights:• The study identifies gaps in Indonesia’s legal protection for underage workers.• Enforcement weaknesses hinder effective child protection implementation.• Strengthening legal coordination is essential for policy improvement. Keywords: Child Labor, Legal Protection, Normative Law, Child Rights, Indonesia
Civil Law Analysis of MSME Sale Agreements via Short Messages: Analisis Hukum Perdata atas Perjanjian Jual Beli Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) Melalui Pesan Singkat Churniawan, Mohammad Bagus Feri; Muis, Lidya Shery
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025): February
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i1.1366

Abstract

General Background: The rapid digital transformation in business practices has led to the widespread use of short messaging applications, such as WhatsApp, for conducting sales transactions among Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). Specific Background: However, the absence of clear legal frameworks for agreements made through these digital platforms often causes disputes and losses for MSME actors. Knowledge Gap: Limited understanding of the legal validity and consumer protection mechanisms within electronic contracts creates uncertainty in enforcing rights and obligations. Aims: This study aims to examine the civil law validity of sale and purchase agreements made via short messages and evaluate the legal protection available for MSMEs in Indonesia. Results: Findings reveal that transactions through messaging applications are legally valid if they fulfill the conditions outlined in Articles 1313 and 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. MSMEs are entitled to compensation when receiving non-compliant goods, yet most lack awareness of claim procedures. Novelty: The study provides a legal framework linking electronic contracts and traditional civil law concepts in the MSME digital context. Implications: Strengthening MSME legal literacy and ensuring transparent electronic contracting processes are crucial to prevent contractual disputes. Highlights: Legal validity of WhatsApp-based contracts under civil law. MSME rights to compensation for non-compliant goods. Integration of civil law principles with digital trade practices. Keywords: Civil Law, MSMEs, Electronic Contract, Consumer Protection, WhatsApp Transactions
PERAN NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA PERJANJIAN JUAL PUTUS HAK CIPTA BUKU Lidya Shery Muis; Agung Sujatmiko; Sigit Nugroho
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 17, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v17i2.15813

Abstract

Abstrak Jual putus merupakan bentuk pengalihan hak ekonomi dari pencipta kepada pemegang hak cipta. Jual putus terbagi atas dua macam yaitu berjangka waktu dan tidak berjangka waktu. Notaris merupakan pejabat yang diberi wewenang oleh pemerintah untuk membuat akta otentik yang berisikan kehendak para pihak yang tidak bertentangan dengan Undang-undang, ketertiban umum dan kesusilaan. Akta otentik menjamin kepastian hukum para pihak dan pihak ketiga, sehingga diharapkan tidak ada pihak yang dirugikan. Kerugian yang timbul karena kesalahan notaris, maka notaris dapat bertanggung gugat atas kesalahan yang dilakukannya dengan cara ganti rugi. Penelitian ini menggunakan tipe penelitian normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dikaji menggunakan aturan hukum terkait kewenangan notaris dalam pembuatan akta perjanjian jual putus hak cipta buku. Pengkajian dilakukan dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual kemudian dianalisis hubungan antara aturan hukum secara sistematis. Perjanjian jual putus berjangka waktu yang diatur dalam Pasal 18 UUHC kembali kepada pencipta setelah 25 (dua puluh lima) tahun hak cipta dikuasai oleh pemegang hak cipta. Notaris dapat dimintai pertanggunggugatan apabila ada kesalahan yang tidak sesuai dengan UUJN dan UUHC terhadap akta jual putus yang dibuatnya dan beresiko menimbulkan kerugian bagi para pihak. Dapat digugat dengan Pasal 1365 BW yaitu perbuatan melanggar hukum. 
Regulasi Terhadap Penggolongan Obat di Indonesia Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan Muhammad Mauludhin Rif'an; Lidya Shery Muis
Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 9 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Jayapangus Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37329/ganaya.v9i1.5107

Abstract

A regulatory vacuum emerged in drug classification following the enactment of Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health, primarily due to the government’s failure to issue the implementing Government Regulations mandated under Article 320(8) and Article 321(8). This study aims to analyze the regulatory gap resulting from the absence of these implementing regulations and to assess its implications for legal certainty in drug classification.Using a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study evaluates the legal validity, hierarchical coherence, and substantive adequacy of existing regulations governing drug classification.The results indicate that the classification framework introduced by Law 17/2023 cannot be applied because no technical Government Regulation has been issued to operationalize the classification standards. In practice, there is a regression to the use of old drug classification categories derived from previous regulations. Furthermore, Minister of Health Regulation No. 28 of 2022 and BPOM Regulation No. 21 of 2020 are no longer legally compatible because they rely on Law No. 36/2009, which has been repealed. Their continued use creates inconsistencies within the regulatory hierarchy and weakens the enforceability of drug classification norms.This study concludes that the misalignment between the new statutory mandate and outdated implementing regulations generates significant uncertainty and undermines the effectiveness of pharmaceutical governance. The study recommends the immediate issuance of a Government Regulation to establish a coherent, authoritative, and technologically adaptive basis for drug classification under the current health law framework.