Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Oslami, Ahmad Fikri
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
CONCRETIZATIONOF URGENT REASON AND SUFFICIENTEVIDENCE IN PROVIDING MARRIAGE DISPENSATION FOR CHILDREN BY THE JUDGE Mansari, Mansari; Fatahillah, Zahrul; Muzakir, Muzakir; Oslami, Ahmad Fikri; Zainuddin, Muslim
Nurani Vol 20 No 2 (2020): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v20i2.5898

Abstract

The article discusses the concretization of urgent reasons and sufficient evidence for granting marriage dispensations in Law Number 16 Year 2019. This purpose of this study is how to concretize urgent reasons and sufficient evidence by the judge inproviding marriage dispensations for children. Researchers used empirical legal research methods and primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and primary data obtained through interviews with Syar’iyah court judges. Data analysis was performed prescriptively to provide an assessment of the implementation of the Marriage Law. The results showed that the petition for marriage dispensation for children after the legitimation of Law Number 16 Year 2019 increased despite being complicated by the Supreme Court Regulations and it was resulted that the age of the petitionfor marriage dispensation between 15 and 19 years old. Children must attend the court for obtaining the advice related to the risk of child marriage. Concretization of the urgent condition and sufficient evidence is carried out with observing the facts at thecouncil, namely worrying about acts that are prohibited from religion, getting pregnant out of wedlock and doing tandem (khalwat). The sufficient evidences were concreted by the judge. He/She requested the witnesses who knew the background of the parents and prospective husband/ wife attended the council to investigate the reasons for the marriage of the child and proof of marriage rejection from the KUA, Child Identity Cards, birth certificates and final diplomas. It is recommended that judges must prioritize the best interestfor the children and the reproductive health certificate from the hospital should be requested.
ENFORCEMENT OF JINAYAT LAW FOR NON-MUSLIMS IN ACEH Mahmuddin, Mahmuddin; Mansari, Mansari; Khairuddin, Khairuddin; Oslami, Ahmad Fikri; Irawan, Mul
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.1.2022.21-42

Abstract

Law enforcement against non-Muslims who commit violations of jinayat law tends to use the penalties stipulated in the Qanun Hukum Jinayat compared to other criminal statutory provisions. This phenomenon is interesting to study because non-Muslims who commit criminal acts (Jarimah) are given the choice of choosing to use Qanun or other Criminal Law which is regulated outside the Qanun. This study aims to analyze how the enforcement of jinayat law against Jarimah is carried out by non-Muslims, why non-Muslims are more likely to choose jinayat law than the provisions of other criminal laws and regulations outside of the Qanun and which penalties are imposed more dominantly by syar'iyah court judges. The author uses the empirical juridical research method with the aim of describing concrete facts about jinayat law enforcement for non-Muslims. The primary legal materials used are Qanun Hukum Jinayat Qanun Hukum Procedural Jinayat. Secondary legal materials, namely through books, journals and research results. Primary data was obtained through interviews with non-Muslims who had been sentenced according to qanun, judges and Wilayatuh Hisbah (WH). The results showed that enforcement of jinayat law for non-Muslims must first seek approval from the suspect to use qanuns or criminal laws other than qanuns. Then the investigator takes action according to the choice set by the suspect. Non-Muslims tend to choose qanuns due to several factors: first, the punishment is more instantaneous than the KUHP which carries a prison sentence. Second, the people who witnessed the execution of the caning were not all citizens who knew him. The more dominant punishments handed down by judges were ta'zir flogging and actions in the form of revoking their business license.
Co-Authors Fatahillah, Zahrul Khairuddin - Mahmuddin Mahmuddin Mansari, Mansari Mul Irawan, Mul Muslim Zainuddin Muzakir