Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research International Journal of Multidisciplinary Reseach
Abd Fatah, Rahmat
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Local Capacity, Village Governance, and Livelihood Development: A Review Prakoso, Maliki Aji; Fadli, Amril; Abd Fatah, Rahmat; Mardhotillah, Bunga; Prananingrum, Dwi Kartika; Feriana, Rina; Ariyanto, Komang
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v5i3.19784

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on the relationship between local capacity, village governance, and livelihood development at the village level. It aims to explore how local capacity enhances village governance and its subsequent effect on the livelihoods of community members. The review analyzes previously published scholarly articles on the subject. The findings reveal that robust local capacity is positively correlated with more effective village governance, which, in turn, promotes sustainable livelihood development. Additionally, the article identifies key factors influencing this relationship, including community participation, program sustainability, and government policy support. In conclusion, the article emphasizes the importance of strengthening local capacity and enhancing village governance as strategies for fostering sustainable livelihood development. The insights from this literature review are intended to guide policymakers and practitioners in designing more effective village development programs.
INTEGRATING QUALITATIVE INQUIRY AND SURVEY RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCES: A DESCRIPTIVE AND ANALYTICAL LITERATURE REVIEW Abd Fatah, Rahmat
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Reseach Vol. 1 No. 5 (2025): Desember
Publisher : International Journal of Multidisciplinary Reseach

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Recent developments in contemporary social sciences indicate a growing need for methodological approaches capable of explaining the complexity of social reality in a manner that is both in-depth and representative. The longstanding tension between the depth of meaning offered by qualitative research and the breadth of generalization associated with survey research has driven the advancement of mixed methods as an integrative research strategy. This article aims to map and analyze global trends in the integration of qualitative and survey methods in social science research through a descriptive and analytical literature review approach. The literature search was conducted using reputable international databases, namely Scopus and Web of Science, supplemented by Google Scholar, covering publications from 2000 to 2024. The selected articles consist of peer-reviewed publications that explicitly discuss or apply the integration of qualitative and survey approaches. The analysis employs thematic and conceptual synthesis to identify epistemological rationales, dominant methodological design patterns, the strategic role of surveys, and levels of methodological integration in social research practice. The findings indicate that pragmatism constitutes the dominant epistemological foundation, accompanied by hybrid practices that combine interpretivist and post-positivist logics. Sequential designs, particularly the sequential exploratory design, emerge as the most globally prevalent pattern, while surveys play a strategic role not only as instruments of quantification but also as mechanisms for generalizing qualitative findings, validating constructs, and constructing social typologies. The findings further reveal that methodological integration most frequently occurs at the design and interpretation stages, whereas integration at the analytical stage remains limited. This article contributes to methodological reflection by emphasizing the importance of coherence in integration logic as a fundamental prerequisite for meaningful and scientifically accountable mixed methods practice in social science research.
Co-Authors Fadli, Amril Feriana, Rina Komang Ariyanto Mardhotillah, Bunga Prakoso, Maliki Aji Prananingrum, Dwi Kartika