Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

Legal Product Formation and Financial Management Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen; Nirahua, Garciano; Soplantila, Ronny
AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Volume 5 Issue 2, July 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/aiwadthu.v5i2.2990

Abstract

Introduction: The village is granted broader authority to regulate and manage the interests of the community. Therefore, a number of village regulations must be created to effectively implement this authority. The importance of these village regulations is also aimed at accelerating the realization of public welfare through improvements in services, empowerment, community participation, and enhancing regional competitiveness, while considering the principles of democracy, equity, justice, as well as the uniqueness and special characteristics of each region within the framework of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia.Purposes of The Devotion: The aim of this community service activity is to enhance the knowledge and skills of the community regarding the position of regional regulations, the process of making regional regulations, and the proper implementation of village governance.Method of The Devotion: Community service is carried out using a legal counseling method that focuses on interactive presentations or seminars, so that the service is not monotonous and does not only rely on the speaker. The topics covered include the formation of regional legal products, or "Perneg," and financial management in the administration of regional governance.Results Main Findings of the Devotion: In general, participants in the community service activity are not aware that the role of regional regulations in the process of regional governance is very fundamental. This is because the process of regional governance itself is regulated in such a way in the law, where every rule or technical guideline for managing the region is already outlined in that law. Specifically, regarding the boundaries of the region and regional governance, these need to be regulated in regional regulations, as this will impact the status of the region itself.
Kewenangan Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Dalam Menyatakan Kerugian Keuangan Wirabuana, Zainuddin; Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen; Bakarbessy, Andress Deny
MATAKAO Corruption Law Review Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Mei 2023 MATAKAO Corruption Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Korupsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/matakao.v1i1.9054

Abstract

Introduction: The Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) is an internal supervisor who carries out the task of administering government affairs in the field of state/regional financial supervision and national development. Law enforcement officials often use the results of the APIP audit as evidence in trials of corruption cases, as well as the panel of judges at the Ambon District Court continues to accept the results of calculations and provide expert opinions in trials. Purposes of the Research: Analyzing juridically through reviewing laws and regulations relating to the authority of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus in declaring state financial losses, and analyzing the relationship between supervisory and auditing institutions (BPK and APIP) in determining and declaring state financial losses. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative, that is, research that primarily examines positive legal provisions and legal principles, explain and predicts in the direcrion of future legal developments. Results of the Research: The results of the research show that (1) APIP remains authorized to conduct investigative audits, audit calculations of state financial losses and provide expert testimony at trial, (2) There is no legal protection that regulates the pattern of confidential audit results relations between APIP and BPK. Therefore, it is necessary to enact laws and regulations that reinforce the role of each supervisory and examiner institution to create legal certainty and prevent overlapping authorities.
Kewenangan Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Dalam Menyatakan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Wirabuana, Zainuddin; Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen; Bakarbessy, Andress Deny
MATAKAO Corruption Law Review Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Mei 2024 MATAKAO Corruption Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Korupsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/matakao.v2i1.13517

Abstract

Introduction: The Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) is an internal supervisor who carries out the task of administering government affairs in the field of state/regional financial supervision and national development. Law enforcement officials often use the results of the APIP audit as evidence in trials of corruption cases, as well as the panel of judges at the Ambon District Court continues to accept the results of calculations and provide expert opinions in trials. Purposes of the Research: Research methods with the aim of analyzing juridically through reviewing laws and regulations related to the authority of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus in declaring state financial losses, and analyzing the relationship between supervisory and auditing institutions (BPK and APIP) in determining and declaring state financial losses Methods of the Research: The writing of this thesis uses normative legal Results of the Research: The results of the research show that (1) APIP remains authorized to conduct investigative audits, audit calculations of state financial losses and provide expert testimony at trial, (2) There is no legal protection that regulates the pattern of confidential audit results relations between APIP and BPK. Therefore, it is necessary to enact laws and regulations that reinforce the role of each supervisory and examiner institution to create legal certainty and prevent overlapping authorities.
Eksistensi Lembaga Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Mahu, Muhammad Ridwan; Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen; Salmon, Hendrik
BAMETI Customary Law Review Vol 1 No 2 (2023): Desember 2023 BAMETI Customary Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Pesisir dan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/bameti.v1i2.12092

Abstract

In customary law communities, disputes have long been resolved by deliberation and consensus through customary institutions known as customary courts. Usually, those who act as judges in these institutions are traditional leaders (customary heads) and religious leaders. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the position of customary institutions in resolving land disputes, as well as whether the decisions of customary institutions have binding legal force. This research is a normative juridical research, using a descriptive analytical research type using primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The approach used is a statutory approach (Statute Approach), a conceptual approach (conceptual approach) and a case approach (Case Approach). The technique of collecting legal materials uses a literature study which is then analyzed qualitatively in order to answer the problems studied. The position of customary institutions in land disputes as Customary Judicial Institutions used to resolve conflicts that generally occur in customary law communities is by way of dispute resolution outside the court according to the customary law system based on peace and harmony in people's lives. The decisions of the Customary Courts have binding force on the disputing parties, although in the hierarchy of judicial power the decisions of customary judges are not explicitly recognized, but in practice the existence of customary judges decisions is still recognized as long as the customary law community is also recognized and implemented by the disputing parties so that every decisions issued by customary judges are binding on the customary law community concerned.