Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.978
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Hukum Sasana Abdi Bhara: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Otih Handayani
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Kontroversi Sanksi Denda Pada Vaksinasi Covid-19 Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan Otih Handayani
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 15 No. 1 (2021): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: JUNE 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v15i1.557

Abstract

Kesehatan merupakan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Negara bertanggung jawab atas penyediaan fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan setiap warga negara Indonesia sebagaimana amanah Pasal 28H angka (1) dan Pasal 34 angka (3) UUD 1945. Pada Pandemic Covid-19, Pemerintah memimplementasikan dengan pengadaan vaksin dan pelaksanaan vaksinasi Covid-19. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji penerapan kaidah-kaidah atau norma-norma dalam hukum yang positif yang kemudian dihubungkan dengan pembahasan yang menjadi pokok pembahasan. Penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji aturan hukum bersifat formil seperti undang-undang, peraturan serta literatur yang berisi konsep-konsep teoritis. Hasil penelitian mendiskripsikan bahwa Dalam Perpres No. 14 tahun 2021 menyatakan bahwa Setiap orang yang telah ditetapkan sebagai sasaran penerima vaksin Covid- 19 dan tidak mengikuti vaksinasi Covid-19 dapat dikenai sanksi denda. Hal lain adalah penerima vaksin adalah orang sehat yang sesungguhnya tidak melakukan pelanggaran kesehatan sehingga peraturan ini tidak mencerminkan Asas keadilan sebagaimana tertera dalam pasal 2 Undang-Undang No. 36 tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan.
KEDUDUKAN HARTA BENDA DALAM PERKAWINAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 Esther Masri; Otih Handayani
Abdi Bhara Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Abdi Bhara: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/r6xgcc54

Abstract

However, these assets can cause conflicts in thehousehold because husband and wife do not understand theposition of property in marriage in the event of divorce anddeath. The position of property is regulated in Law Number 1 of1974 concerning Marriage which recognizes 3 (three) kinds ofassets, namely joint property, inherited property and acquiredproperty. Joint property is property acquired during marriage,while inheritance and acquisition are the innate property of eachhusband and wife. The property obtained by husband and wife asa gift or inheritance is under the control of each as long as theparties do not specify otherwise. The existence of legal provisionsregarding inherited and acquired assets but can be used as jointproperty by making a marriage agreement. The communityservice team at the Faculty of Law, Bhayangkara Universitycarried out legal counseling activities at the Citra VillaMangunjaya Housing, Tambun Selatan District, Bekasi regencywhich directly interacted with the community, especially thewomen in Rukun Warga 028. The purpose of this activity was toincrease public knowledge and understanding regardingownership and position of property. property in marriage, candistinguish joint property and innate property so that they knowthe rights and obligations of each towards their property. Theresults of the activities are made and documented in the form ofimplementation reports and published in scientific journals inorder to provide benefits in the academic field and at thepractical level.
Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Usaha Pada Pembtalan Perjanjian Kerjasama Antara Klien Dengan Perusahaan Wedding Organizer Kamilah Is’ad; Otih Handayani; Widya Romasindah Aidy
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Februari : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v2i1.834

Abstract

Occasionally, one of the parties involved in the client-wedding organizer company's cooperation agreement will decide to back out of the deal. Specifically, from Article 1446 to Article 1456, KUHPerdata acknowledges and regulates the agreement's termination. But you can't just terminate any old agreement; you have to follow the rules laid out in Article 1320 KUHPerdata.An organization in the service sector, the wedding organizer helps engaged couples or soon-to-be-weds, together with their families, with every step of the wedding preparation and celebration process. Our study's overarching goal is to learn who exactly is at fault when a client and wedding planning company decide to end their cooperation arrangement. This study employed the normative legal research approach, also known as normative juridical research. This research employs legal resources, such as KUHPerdata and Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection, to undertake qualitative analysis of the data. First and foremost, according to the research, the laws specified in Articles 1446–1456 of KUHPerdata and Articles 5 and 7 of Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection establish the basis for accountability. Second, the debtor is not liable for compensation under Article 1244 of KUHPerdata and Article 1245 of the Force Majeure clause of the contract, which absolves the debtor of such liability. In addition, the twenty percent client reimbursement policy is just that a policy of the company.
Menuju Kota Tanjung Selor Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah Dedi Herdianto; Otih Handayani
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Sasana: December 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sasana.v8i2.1278

Abstract

The formation of the territory is needed so that the government is closer to its people so that it can facilitate the implementation of tasks such as the implementation of the function of serving the community, because the government is essentially formed to serve the community as stated in Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution.Tanjung Selor as the capital of North Kalimantan Province is currently still in the status of a sub-district, unlike in general the provincial capitals in Indonesia are cities. This research uses a normative research method which is carried out by focusing on the study of library materials or secondary data by using the Legislative Approach (Statute Approach) and the Conceptual Approach (Conceptual Approach). The results of this study conclude that firstly, the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, the formation of new regions is carried out by means of Regional Expansion and Merger as stipulated in Article 32 and the technical implementation is stated in Article 33 for ExpansionRegions and Article 44 for Regional Merger.second, the formation of Tanjung Selor City by regional expansion will be easier than through merging the regions, by merging the four sub-districts in Bulungan Regency. third, Bulungan Regency as the parent area, has six sub-districts by making Tanjung Palas District the district capital. Fourth, the merging of regions to form Tanjung Selor City as a new area, will experience many obstacles. especially to fulfill administrative requirements as well as basic requirements for regional capacity.
Pertanggungjawaban Wali Dalam Menjalankan Kekuasaan Terhadap Harta Anak Di Bawah Umur Setelah Berakhirnya Perwalian Kartika Gusmawati; Esther Masri; Otih Handayani
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Hukum Sasana: June 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sasana.v9i1.1354

Abstract

A guardian is a person who is given the authority to carry out a legal act in order to protect the interests of a child who does not have both parents or both parents are incapable of carrying out legal actions. The guardian's responsibility for the person and property of the child under his guardianship until the child is an adult and capable of performing legal actions. The research method that the author uses is normative juridical, namely library research by examining laws and regulations related to legal problems or issues being faced. The results of the author's research that children's assets under guardianship are in the form of permanent objects such as land and buildings and the ownership of land rights is still in the name of the guardian, so when the trust ends or the child is declared an adult the guardian is obliged and responsible for handing over all of the child's assets by transferring rights in the form of grants which must be made a grant deed before the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) through the correct legal procedures. Then, the recipient of the grant must arrange the process of transferring land rights to the office of the National Land Agency so that the status of the grant becomes his property.
Kontroversi Intervensi Eksekutif Di Pemilu 2024 Dalam Perspektif UUD 1945 dan UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Dedi Herdianto; Otih Handayani; Esther Masri
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Sasana: June 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sasana.v10i1.1907

Abstract

Pemerintahan yang berdaulat merupakan salah satu syarat terbentuknya sebuah negara. Indonesia sebagai negara demokratis yang menganut sistem pemerintahan Presidensial dan dalam pelaksanaan pemerintahannya berlandaskan atas Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Untuk menentukan pemerintahan berdaulat, Pemilihan Umum merupakan sarana pelimpahan wewenang yang dimiliki masyarakat dengan memilih pemimpin untuk menjalankan pemerintahan secara sah dan bertanggung jawab. Pemilihan umum sebagai hajatan demokrasi lima tahunan harus dilaksanakan secara langsung, bebas, rahasia, jujur dan adil oleh semua lapisan masyarakat Indonesia, termasuk pemimpin negara sebagai eksekutif. Namun, ada yang menarik pada pemilihan umum 2024 kali ini, eksekutif terlihat turut campur (cawe-cawe) dalam gelaran pesta demokrasi tersebut. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yang dilakukan dengan fokus pada penelaahan bahan pustaka atau data sekunder yang menggunakan pendekatan Perundang-Undangan (Statute Approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (Conseptual Approach) dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui peraturan apa saja yang dapat dilanggar atas turut campurnya eksekutif dalam pemilihan umum 2024 dan seberapa besar dampaknya. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu: Pertama, bahwa dengan kekuasaan dan hak kewenangan prerogatif yang melekat di Presiden sangat mempengaruhi tatanan pelaksanaan pemerintahan di Indonesia. Presiden bisa saja dengan sadar maupun tidak, dapat melakukan penyimpangan atau penyalahgunaan kekuasaannya (abuse of power). Selain itu, fasilitas-fasilitas negara dapat menguntungkan bagi salah satu kelompok tertentu dan merugikan kelompok lainnya. Kedua, pelanggaran terhadap asas Pemilu terkhusus adil, jujur dan bebas atas turut campurnyaeksekutif dalam Pemilihan Umum 2024 yang disertai dengan penyalahgunaan kekuasaan dan kewenangan yang dimiliki menjadi preseden buruk hingga pada level yang paling bawah sekalipun. Pemilu akan berjalan tanpa adanya keadilan bagi peserta, kejujuran seluruh pihak yang terlibat patut dipertanyakan dan hilangnya kekebasan masyarakat dalam memberikan hak suara akibat mendapatkan tekanan.  
Analisis Legal Standing Penerbitan Surat Keterangan Nikah oleh Kepala Desa Pada Pernikahan Siri di Desa Banjarsari Bekasi Muhammad Faisal Hendriawan; Putri, Elfirda Ade; Otih Handayani
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 14 No. 2 (2020): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v14i2.389

Abstract

Tujuan perkawinan adalah membentuk suatu keluarga (rumah tangga) yang bahagia dan kekal berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa. Untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut diperlukan sosialisasi peraturan perundang-undangan bagi masyarakat dan penegakan peraturan oleh pejabat Pemerintah yang berwenang. Peneliti ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji penerapan kaidah-kaidah atau norma-norma dalam hukum yang positif yang kemudian dihubungkan dengan pembahasan yang menjadi pokok pembahasan. penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji aturan hukum bersifat formil seperti undang-undang, peraturan serta literatur yang berisi konsep-konsep teoritis. Hasil penelitian mendeskripsikan berdasarkan Deskresi yang dimiliki Kepala Desa diterbitkan Surat Keterangan Pernikahan oleh Kepala Desa dan Perangkat Desa Banjarsari Bekasi kepada masyarakat Desa yang melakukan pernikahan secara siri/dibawah tangan. Hal ini dimaksudkan untuk memberikan keringanan dalam memenuhi syarat administrasi untuk pembuatan dokumen penting. Berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, Kepala Desa dan Perangkat Desa tidak memiliki legal standing untuk menerbitkan Surat Keterangan Nikah sehingga berpotensi melakukan pelanggaran Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan yang mengakibatkan Surat Keterangan Nikah tidak sah menurut hukum serta kepada Kepala Desa dapat dikenakan sanksi administrasi.
Perlindungan Konsumen Produk Skincare Pada Penjualan Secara Online Otih Handayani; Esther Masri
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 17 No. 3 (2023): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v17i3.781

Abstract

Skincare is a skin care product that is popular among the majority of female consumers. One way to obtain skincare products is through online purchases, which, despite its advantages, also has disadvantages such as not meeting expectations (cheap prices but containing harmful substances) and being prone to fraud. The aim of this research is to understand the regulations regarding online buying and selling and consumer protection for skincare products using the online buying and selling system, particularly in terms of negative impacts on consumer health. This research is a doctrinal study that utilizes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The results of this research are as follows: Firstly, the online buying and selling of skincare products through marketplaces, as stipulated in Articles 1457 and 1458 of the Civil Code, utilize electronic contracts that include the identification of the parties involved, object and specifications, requirements for electronic transactions, pricing and costs, cancellation procedures, rights of aggrieved parties, and dispute resolution. Online buying and selling is recognized as a legitimate and accountable electronic transaction based on Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 on the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions. Online buying and selling is also regulated by the fatwa of the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council, No. 05/DSN-MUI/IV/2000, which provides provisions regarding payment, goods, parallel salam, goods delivery, cancellation, and disputes. Secondly, consumers of skincare products through online buying and selling are protected by the state both preventively through legislation (Consumer Protection Law No. 8 of 1999, Health Law No. 36 of 2009, Law No. 19 of 2016 on Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions, Civil Code, and Criminal Code) and repressively (compensation by businesses; non-litigation through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board (BPSK); litigation through the courts).
Penetapan Wali Hakim Sebagai Pengganti Wali Adlal Yang Tidak Menyetujui Pernikahan Anaknya Elang Darmawan; Ahmad Baihaki; Otih Handayani
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v15i2.1116

Abstract

Humans are gifted by God Almighty to be able to reproduce and continue their offspring. The marriage order in Indonesia is regulated in the rules of marriage law. including Law no. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). In the KHI it is stated that the guardian of marriage in marriage is a pillar that must be fulfilled for the prospective bride who acts to marry her. Problems occur when lineage guardians are reluctant to marry off their children due to parental considerations regarding the seeds, bebet and the weight of the prospective son-in-law. This study aims to examine the application of positive legal rules or norms which are then linked to the discussion that is the subject of discussion. Normative juridical law research is carried out by examining formal legal rules such as laws, regulations and literature containing theoretical concepts. The results of the study describe that the determination of the guardian of the judge as a substitute for the guardian of Adlal can be done by using the correct marriage mechanism, the marriage cannot be prevented or canceled because the bride and groom have met the requirements of marriage and there is no marriage ban
Penggunaan Cyber Notary Pada Akta Autentik dan Kekuatan Pembuktiannya Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Friko Rumadanu; Esther Masri; Otih Handayani
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 16 No. 1 (2022): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: JUNE 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v16i1.1192

Abstract

Notaries are currently allowed to certify electronic documents. This authority is contained in Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the position of a notary. A part from ratifying the deed, a notary can also save files in the form of file. But not a few notaries are still reluctant to use technology to make and ratify a deed due to conflicts between articles both in the notary office law itself and with articles in other laws. This study aims to determine whether the deed that uses information technology has the strength of proof like an authentic deed and whether the electronic certification carried out by a notary is in line with the duties and positions of the notary. The research method used is the type of normative legal research conducted by reviewing library materials on secondary data using a legal approach and a conceptual approach. This study focuses on the deed of the extraordinary general meeting of Shareholders of PT. Lippo Karawaci Tbk which was conducted via video conference on October13 2021. There was disagreement from several shareholders over the certification which was carried out electronically because it was considered to be able to make the deed a private deed. In addition to the conflict between the articles, this is also due to the absence of implementing regulations regarding the making of deeds through information technology by a notary so that there is a need for a review of the relevant Laws and the making of special implementing regulations for cyber notaries.
Co-Authors Ahmad Baihaki Aidy, Widya Romasindah Dedi Herdianto Elang Darmawan Elfirda Ade Putri Esther Masri Friko Rumadanu Kamilah Is’ad Kartika Gusmawati Moammar Khadafi Muhammad Faisal Hendriawan