Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Criminal Acts of Corruption Article 2 and Article 3 According to Law Number 31 Of 1999 as Amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 Concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption (Case Study: Supreme Court Decision No. 260 PK/2011 and Pid.SUS/2011 Supreme Court No. 537 K/Pid.Sus/2014) Dwi Seno Wijanarko
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute May
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i2.5401

Abstract

One of the regulations in the criminal act of corruption is in Article 2 and Article 3 Law Number 31 of 1999 Jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. In this research, there are 2 (two) research problems. First, how many years of the main sentence can be imposed on the defendant Jimmy Rimba Rogi S.Sos in the case of corruption in the Supreme Court's decision no. 260 PK/Pid.Sus/2011? Second, Can the defendant's political rights be revoked as additional punishment? The research method used is the juridical-normative legal research method. The research resulted in 2 (two) conclusions, namely as follows. First, that the concept of restorative justice in convicting perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption does not completely eliminate criminal sanctions, but prioritizes the provision of sanctions that emphasize efforts to recover from crimes. In this case, the author is of the opinion that there are at least 2 (two) concepts of punishment for perpetrators of corruption that can be applied according to a restorative justice approach, namely: first, recovery of state losses in the form of punishment in the form of forced labor for perpetrators of corruption whose proceeds are confiscated for the state and the imposition of social sanctions. . Second, the defendant's political rights can be revoked as an additional penalty. Additional punishment in the form of revocation of certain rights does not mean that the rights of the convict can be revoked altogether. The revocation does not include the revocation of the right to life, civil (civil) rights, and constitutional rights. There are two things regarding the revocation of certain rights, namely: it is not automatic, must be determined by a judge's decision and is not valid for life, there is a certain period of time according to the applicable laws and regulations with a judge's decision. Based on these provisions, the imposition of additional criminal revocation of political rights against the convict is not contrary to the Criminal Code as long as the revocation of rights is concurrent and does not exceed the period of application as has been applied by law.
THE ISSUE OF JUDICIAL COMPETENCE IN THE SETTLEMENT OF SHARIA ECONOMIC INSOLVENCY Dwi Seno Wijanarko
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (166.664 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v4i1.238

Abstract

Settlement of bankruptcy disputes, according to Sharia banking law. Based on UUPA No:3 of 2006 related to the authority of the Religious Court to examine sharia economic disputes and based on PERMA No: 2 of 2008 on the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law decided directly by the Supreme Court referring to Law No: 27 of 2004 which appoints about the Commercial Court. Whereas the Religious Court that has the authority of bankruptcy disputes contains elements of Sharia Economics, including Islamic banking. Insolvency Decision No: 7/ Bankruptcy/2011/PU. Niaga JKT PST strengthened MARI Verdict No: 346F/PDT. SUS / Year 2011 which does not consider the existence of PERMA Number: 2 of 2008 on Compilation of Economic Law established by the Supreme Court.
Kedudukan Miranda Rules dan Penegakan Hukumnya dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Dwi Seno Wijanarko; Irman Jaya
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Sasana: December 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sasana.v7i2.1229

Abstract

Miranda Rules are an important instrument in criminal justice which regulates the rights of suspects during the investigation process (investigation and investigation). These rights are in the form of the right to remain silent during the examination and the right to be accompanied by a legal advisor during the examination and trial process, if he is unable to bring a legal representative, then it is the obligation of the relevant agency to bring him in. This paper seeks to answer two big questions related to the Miranda Rule, namely how is the Miranda Rules concept in realizing a judicial process that still provides protection for the rights of suspects? as well as how Miranda Rules are implemented in a practical level? This paper produces two main languages: First, Miranda Rule is an important point in criminal justice because it concerns the rights possessed by the suspect during the investigation process. As one of the legal states in the world, Indonesia consistently enforces the Miranda Rule marked by the adoption of the Miranda Rule concept into various kinds of laws and regulations relating to the judiciary. Second, although the Miranda Rule plays a big role in law enforcement, in practice there are still many cases of violations against the Miranda Rule. Violation of the enforcement of the Miranda Rule has legal consequences in the form of invalidity of the charges against the suspect, because the charges are based on investigations and illegal statements so that they are null and void. Seeing the urgency of the Miranda Rule in the judicial system, it is necessary to comply with law enforcement, aimed not only at the community, but also at the legal structure as an arrow in law enforcement.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Korban Kekerasan Secara Verbal (Catcalling) Anggreany Haryani Putri; Dwi Seno Wijanarko
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 15 No. 1 (2021): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: JUNE 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v15i1.594

Abstract

Pada hakikatnya, manusia merupakan makhluk sosial yang hidup berdampingan atau bekerja sama dengan orang lain untuk membangun dan bersinergi bersama. Membangun suatu hubungan sosial harus adanya atu komunikasi dan pola tingkah laku terhadap sesama Suatu hubungan sosial dapat terbentuk melalui komunikasi dan pola tingkah laku yang baik, dalam menjalin suatu komunikasi dengan orang lain pada umunya seseorang pasti melontarkan suatu perkataan yang mengandung unsur sapaan atau pujian hal ini dilakukan dengan tujuan membuat komunikasi menjadi semakin akrab dan cenderung tidak kaku. Dalam beberapa hal seperti ini kerapkali ucapan atau pujian yang dilontarkan tersebut cenderung kearah hal yang bernuansa seksual seperi siulan, pujian yang seharusnya tak pantas diucapkan, kedipan mata, atau hal lain yang berkaitan. Terkadang dan tanpa disadari hal tersebut dalam pola prilaku masyarakat dianggap biasa saja padahal perilaku semacam itu merupakan salah satu bentuk pelecehan yang kemudian disebut dengan catcalling. Jika memandang dari sisi Hukum Perlindungan Anak dan Perempuan perilaku catcalling merupakan suatu pelecehan sebab si korban merasa dilecehkan sehingga merasa, tak nyaman, terganggu, bahkan terteror dengan perilaku tersebut. Pelaku catcalling bisa dijerat dengan hukuman pidana secara Undang- Undang maupun dengan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Kedudukan Hukum Tenaga Medis dan Tenaga Kesehatan Perawat Sebagai Pemangku Profesi Kesehatan Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan Hotma P. Sibuea; Dwi Seno Wijanarko; Ali Johardi Wirogioto; Erwin Syahruddin; Katrina Siagian
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 17 No. 3 (2023): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v17i3.789

Abstract

Health professions recognized autonomously by law consist of (1) the medical profession, (2) nursing, and (3) midwifery. These three health professions have different legal principles, so both types of professions have professional autonomy. The professional autonomy of health professions has consequences for various aspects of the existence of health profession stakeholders, such as their position, function, tasks, authority, and legal responsibilities. One of the legal aspects of health profession stakeholders is the legal standing of each health profession stakeholder. The law does not regulate the legal standing of health profession stakeholders in healthcare services, resulting in a legal vacuum regarding the legal standing of these health profession stakeholders. Do health profession stakeholders have equal or different legal standing in healthcare services from the perspective of the principle of legal equality? The research method used is the juridical-normative research method, which examines primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research conclusion is that the legal standing of health profession stakeholders is the same and equal from the perspective of the principle of legal equality. The suggestion presented is that legislators need to amend healthcare laws, medical practice laws, nursing laws, and midwifery laws to regulate and establish the legal standing of health profession stakeholders as the same and equal based on the principle of legal equality.
THE REPEAL OF INDONESIA’S DEATH PENALTY FOR CORRUPT OFFICIALS Dwi Seno Wijanarko
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Adisam Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The implementation of the death penalty for corruptors in Indonesia is criticized for its ineffectiveness in deterring corruption and its inconsistency with the country’s commitment to upholding human rights. While some nations enforce the death penalty for corruption with minimal success, others achieve better results through preventive measures that do not involve capital punishment. The death penalty is seen as contradicting Indonesia's legal framework and international human rights obligations, as it is equated to state-sponsored premeditated murder. As an alternative, this paper proposes impoverishing corruptors by recovering misappropriated state assets and imposing restrictions on their civil and political rights, thereby preventing recidivism and reducing future harm to the state. This approach would align with human rights principles while fostering a more effective anti-corruption strategy.