Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Corruptio Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Atmaja, Budi Arta
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Dissenting Opinion of Corruption Court Judges as a Form of Freedom and Legal Reform in Indonesia Simanjuntak, Louis Fernando; Rusmiati, Elis; Atmaja, Budi Arta
Corruptio Vol 4 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v4i2.3050

Abstract

The existence of dissenting opinions is a step in organizing law enforcement. This is also an important issue in organizing judicial power in relation to the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 48/2009 on Judicial Power. In Indonesia itself, judges are allowed to give dissenting opinions, although there has never been a clear definition of dissenting opinions. In Anglo-Saxon law, dissenting opinions have become commonplace, and these dissenting opinions often form new laws. This is in line with the term "judge made law". Therefore, the existence of dissenting opinion is very important, because it can continue to update the existing law.This research includes normative or doctrinal legal analysis because it wants an accurate and clear picture of the judge's dissenting opinion on the verdict of a corruption case. To explain and find answers to problems, theories are used as the basis for analysis, namely Legal Certainty Theory, Judicial Power Theory, Evidence Theory, Legal Construction Theory, and Sentencing Theory.The impact of the application of dissenting opinions by judges is an instrument towards a better quality of law enforcement, not just a matter of majority and minority in the consideration of judges but a consideration of whether or not a criminal offense has been proven. Therefore, further regulation of the conception of dissenting opinions in Indonesia is important. Legal reform of the Criminal Procedure Code in Indonesia and dissenting opinions must be regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, precisely in the decree article 197, so that it becomes part of the consideration of a decision. The mechanism for entering dissenting opinions needs to be further regulated so that it becomes a form of transparency to the public.
Implementasi Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Siber Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum: Indonesia dan Inggris Raya Indradjaja, Manayra Aisha Putri; Suseno, Sigid; Atmaja, Budi Arta
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v11i2.12931

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the implementation of investigations into cybercrime in Indonesia and the United Kingdom. The implementation of investigations is an important process to ensure that a crime including cybercrime can be handled effectively, the perpetrators can be prosecuted based on applicable legal provisions, and the rights of victims can be protected. The problem in this paper is focused on exploring the implementation of investigations into cybercrime in both countries considering that along with the advancement of the digital era, cybercrime has become an ongoing challenge for law enforcement. In order to approach this problem, a reference is used for comparative criminal law theory to compare legal provisions and understand foreign laws so that they can be used as considerations for national legal reform. Data were collected through a statutory approach and a comparative approach and analyzed qualitatively. This study concludes that there are differentiating factors in the implementation of investigations into cybercrime in Indonesia and the United Kingdom. The implementation of investigations into cybercrime in Indonesia is under the coordination of police investigators, while in the United Kingdom, investigations into cybercrime are divided into two, namely the police who handle cybercrime cases at the regional level and the National Crime Agency which handles cross-border and high-risk cybercrime cases.
Dampak Hukum Penyidikan Polri terhadap Tindak Pidana Di Sektor Jasa Keuangan Andriyani, Fingky Ayu; Wanodyo Sulistyani; Atmaja, Budi Arta
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i2.12012

Abstract

This study aims to examine the validity of evidence obtained by the Indonesian National Police in investigating criminal offenses in the financial services sector during the transitional period between the enactment of the PPSK Law and the Constitutional Court Decision No. 59/PUU-XXI/2023. The urgency of the study lies in the absence of transitional legal norms, which have created legal uncertainty and a potential formal defect in the admissibility of evidence within the criminal justice process. This research adopts a normative juridical method by combining statutory, case-based, and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that police investigations during this period conflicted with the principles of legality and due process of law, rendering the resulting evidence formally invalid. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on the legal consequences of transitional normative gaps and the need for active judicial oversight in assessing the legality of investigative authority. Therefore, this study recommends the establishment of explicit transitional provisions for any shift in investigative authority and the issuance of judicial guidelines by the Supreme Court to ensure the integrity of evidentiary processes in the criminal justice system.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji keabsahan alat bukti hasil penyidikan Polri terhadap tindak pidana di sektor jasa keuangan selama masa transisi antara berlakunya UU PPSK hingga Putusan MK Nomor 59/PUU-XXI/2023. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada kekosongan norma transisional yang menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum dan potensi cacat formil pada alat bukti dalam proses peradilan pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang, kasus konkret, dan konsep hukum. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa penyidikan oleh Polri dalam periode tersebut bertentangan dengan asas legalitas dan due process of law, sehingga alat bukti yang diperoleh seharusnya dinyatakan tidak sah secara formil. Kebaruan dari penelitian ini terletak pada sorotan terhadap implikasi yuridis dari kekosongan norma transisional dan perlunya kontrol yudisial yang aktif dari hakim dalam memverifikasi kewenangan penyidik. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan pembentukan norma transisi eksplisit dalam setiap perubahan kewenangan penyidikan dan penyusunan pedoman yudisial oleh Mahkamah Agung guna menjamin integritas proses pembuktian dalam sistem peradilan pidana.
Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Sponsor Perjudian Online Terhadap Tim Esports Di Indonesia Wibowo, Fadhil Rahadyan; Putri, Nella Sumika; Atmaja, Budi Arta
Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56457/jjih.v3i2.275

Abstract

The Esports industry in Indonesia is experiencing significant growth with large economic contributions, but raises legal issues related to the involvement of sponsors from online gambling companies. Although Article 27 paragraph (2) of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (ITE Law) expressly prohibits gambling, sponsorship practices continue without effective enforcement. This research aims to analyse the application of criminal law against online gambling sponsorship of Esports teams in Indonesia, identify obstacles to law enforcement, and formulate effective criminal law policy strategies. This article is a legal research that not only conducts studies related to laws and regulations, literature, and legal documents, but is also complemented by empirical data through in-depth interviews with the DIY Police Cyber Directorate, Bandung District Attorney, Ministry of Communication and Digital, and the Indonesian Esports Executive Board, as well as direct observation in the field. The results show that to date there has been no investigation, prosecution or conviction of Esports teams receiving online gambling sponsorship. The main obstacles include difficulties in proving the element of intent (mens rea), lack of formal evidence, limited digital forensic facilities, low public legal awareness, and the normalisation of gambling culture in the Esports community. Normatively, the legal basis is adequate, but implementation constraints make the penal path difficult to apply. Therefore, non-penal strategies in the form of legal education, increasing digital literacy, strengthening internal regulations, and cross-sector collaboration need to be optimised, while criminal law functions as an ultimum remedium.
Co-Authors Andriyani, Fingky Ayu Indradjaja, Manayra Aisha Putri Nella Sumika Putri Rusmiati, Elis Sigid Suseno Simanjuntak, Louis Fernando Wanodyo Sulistyani Wibowo, Fadhil Rahadyan