Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Upaya Penyidik dalam Mendapatkan Alat Bukti dari Yurisdiksi Asing Melalui Kerja Sama Antar Negara Haryudiawan, Arif; Basir, Basir; Aminanto, Muhamad Erza
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : CV. Ridwan Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4530.367 KB) | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i8.3884

Abstract

Perkembangan dunia saat ini semakin global dan teknologi yang sangat cepat dan canggih mengakibatkan terjadinya berbagai perubahan sosial di masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik penyidikan tindak pidana siber khususnya skimming yang dilakukan oleh seorang warga negara asing (WNA) di wilayah Jakarta maupun kendala-kendala yang dihadapi oleh penyidik Direktorat Reserse Kriminal Umum (Ditreskrimum) pada Kepolisian Daerah Metropolitan Jakarta Raya (Polda Metro Jaya). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif. Penyidikan yang dilakukan oleh Ditreskrimum Polda Metro Jaya pada saat ini belum memberikan hasil yang maksimal dalam pemberantasan kejahatan skimming yang dilakukan oleh WNA di Jakarta. Penyidik dalam melakukan pemenuhan alat bukti dapat melakukan kerja sama dengan aparat penegak hukum di negara asing, baik secara formal maupun informal.
Legal Comparison of Counter-Terrorism Regulations in Indonesia and Malaysia Yasman, Viora Andari; Aminanto, Muhamad Erza; Lutan, Ahwil
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 4 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute November
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i4.7370

Abstract

This study aims to explain the legal comparison of counterterrorism regulations in Indonesia and Malaysia. This is qualitative descriptive research which uses descriptive analysis. This research employs case approach and statute approach. The data was collected from primary legal materials as well as secondary legal materials. The findings reveal that anti-terrorism countermeasures have been governed in Indonesia by the anti-terrorism act, which focuses on countermeasures after a terrorist attack and prevention which gives Densus 88 the authority to investigate individuals suspected of being part of a terrorist group. Meanwhile, Malaysia has issued the ISA or Internal Security Act since 1960 as a form of defense against terrorist groups. The ISA is a regulation dealing specifically with terrorism cases, in which there are amendments in the form of authority granted to national security forces to arrest and detain individuals who are considered dangerous to national security without justice for 2 years. This policy ultimately created friction among the people because it was considered a weapon that could silence people's aspirations. With the many polemics and cons that side by side with the ISA, this is what ultimately made Malaysia revoke the ISA. As such, it can be concluded that terrorism cases are not cases that can be ignored because they involve life safety and national stability. The legal foundations for this issue must take into account a number of factors, including the principle of humanity or human rights. Regulations made specifically to handle this case will be one of the important points in the sovereignty and stability of a country, this is because terrorism cases involve many aspects in that country.
Revisiting Cyber Threats in Government Sectors: A Systematic Review of Attacks, Challenges, and Policy-Level Defenses Nuraeni, Aisyah; Nugraha, Yudhistira; Aminanto, Muhamad Erza
International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): August 2025 - International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59395/ijadis.v6i2.1404

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) based on the PRISMA framework, synthesizing 128 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2024, drawn from major scholarly databases. The review investigates cyber threats specifically targeting government institutions and identifies phishing, ransomware, malware, and denial-of-service (DoS) attacks as the most prevalent attack vectors affecting government sector environments. In addition to these threats, the study highlights persistent institutional limitations, such as outdated infrastructure, fragmented inter-agency coordination, limited technical capacity, and regulatory gaps, which hinder effective cybersecurity governance and response. To address these challenges, the review compiles both proactive and reactive mitigation strategies, emphasizing the need for SOC design principles such as scalability, interoperability, inter-agency coordination, and resilience in cyber operations. The paper synthesizes its findings into a taxonomy of threat profiles and contextual constraints, offering a foundational reference for building government-specific SOC models. It also outlines future research directions related to operational validation, capability maturity modeling, and institutional alignment in public-sector cybersecurity architectures.