Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.556
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT Al-Isyrof: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam terAs Law Review: Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Tanzhimuna : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Khulasah : Islamic Studies Journal Amicus Curiae Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran J+Plus: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Luar Sekolah
Dewi Aisyah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Amicus Curiae

 1 
ANALISIS KOMPARASI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM MENURUT HUKUM YANG BERLAKU DI NEGARA INDONESIA DENGAN NEGARA MALAYSIA: Comparative Analysis of Dispute Resolution of General Election Results According to the Laws Applicable in Indonesia and Malaysia Dewi Aisyah; Yogo Pamungkas
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i2.23001

Abstract

Each country has different mechanisms for resolving election dispute results. The identification of the problem in this research is the comparison of election dispute resolution mechanisms in Indonesia and Malaysia to identify similarities, differences, advantages, and disadvantages. The research employs a normative legal method with a descriptive approach, utilizing secondary data through literature study. Data analysis is qualitative, with conclusions drawn deductively. Based on the research results and conclusions, it is concluded that both Indonesia and Malaysia have special institutions to handle election disputes, namely the Constitutional Court in Indonesia and the High Court in Malaysia. The main difference lies in the availability of legal remedies in Malaysia, while Indonesia does not have this. Indonesia’s advantage is a more detailed trial process regulation, whereas Malaysia’s advantage is a longer filing period allowing for the collection of more relevant evidence.
Co-Authors Agung Suci Dian Sari Aqib, Indriyani Arlina Permanasari AZIZAH AMAL Dina Fitriyah K, Fatma Naufal, MuhammadZiyan Sri Nawang Wulandari Syibromilisi Syibromilisi Yogo Pamungkas