Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam AL-BASHIRAH: Journal of Islamic Studies JAWAMIUL KALIM: Jurnal Kajian Hadis
Awal Rifai Wahab
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam Dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar
Religion Humanities

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : AL-BASHIRAH: Journal of Islamic Studies

 1 
الفروق الفقهية في كتب فروع المذهب الشافعي Akhmad Hanafi Dain Yunta; Awal Rifai Wahab
البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية Vol 2 No 1 (2021): البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bashirah.v2i1.332

Abstract

Some fuqaha of syafiiyah in describing problems that have the same form but different laws which later became known as furuq fiqhiyyah, fuqaha of syafiiyah has been very prominent in describing furuq fiqhiyyah in the books of furu' mazhab. After reading some of the problems of furuq fiqhiyyah in some of these furu' books, the author finds that there is a difference between one writer and another in describing this furuq fiqhiyyah. Therefore, we need an initial article that explains the general guidelines about furuq fiqhiyyah. The author in this study uses the inductive deductive method by doing a general reading of several books of furu schools of syafiyyah, then concludes the method of describing their furuq fiqhiyyah. The conclusion that the authors get is that fuqaha of syafiiyah in describing furuq fiqhiyyah in the furu' mazhab book uses several categories: first: based on the mention of lafadz furuq used, second: based on the mention of he different sides of the two problems, third: based on the cause and background and the intention of furuq fiqhiyyah mentioned, fourth: based on the basis and origin of this furuq fiqhiyyah, and fifth: based on whether the two problems mentioned in this problem originate from one chapter of fiqh or come from different chapters
حكم تعزير مانع الزكاة بأخذ المال عند المذاهب الأربعة Mukran H. Usman; Bukhari, Imran; Awal Rifai Wahab; Firdaus, Aris
البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية Vol 2 No 2 (2021): البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bashirah.v2i2.419

Abstract

Zakat obligation is matter in religion that are logically already known. Refusing to pay zakat due to ignorance and greed is one of the great sins in afterlife law, and is among the most heinous crimes in worldly law. This research discusses the law of takzir against people who are reluctant to pay zakat by taking their property according to the four schools. This research aims to find out the opinions of the four schools of jurisprudence about the law of takzir against people who are reluctant to pay zakat by taking their property (forcibly), and to know the understanding of disputes of opinion about the takzir against people who are reluctant to pay zakat by taking their property according to four schools. The research methods used in research are inductive-deductive and comparative methods. The results showed that the four schools of jurisprudence agreed to impose takzir on people who are reluctant to pay zakat by taking their property forcibly according to the obligatory zakat rate on it without additional. While some scholars consider that takzir for people who are reluctant to pay zakat is to take their property forcibly according to the obligatory zakat rate on it accompanied by additional punishment that takes half of its property. This is the opinion of the old Shafii (qaul qadīm), one of the narration of Imam Ahmad, as well as the opinion of some scholars such as al-Auzāʿī, Isḥāq bin Rāhūyah, Ibn al-ʿUṡaimīn, in addition to the opinion of the permanent of Fatwa Commission of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. As for the understanding of dissent in this matter is the knowledge that every school of jurisprudence has a proposition as a guideline to strengthen its opinion, so that the difference should not be the cause of division and hostility among the Muslims.
اختلافات الشافعية والحنابلة في صفات الصلاة الفعلية Sirajuddin, Sirajuddin; Nuraeni Novira; Awal Rifai Wahab; Dian Novita Nur
البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية Vol 3 No 1 (2022): البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bashirah.v3i1.527

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to determine the differences between the Shafii and Hanbali schools in the prayer movement and its foundations. This research is a qualitative descriptive study with a comparative study technique. The results showed that: (1) the differences between the Shafii and Hambali schools in the movement of prayer were the limit of raising the hand during takbiratul ihram, the state of the fingers when lifting, the position of the right hand on top of the left hand when holding hands, raising the hand when standing from tasyahud for the third rak'ah, the position of the hands after standing from bowing, and the law of sitting and resting before giving, how to raise the index finger when pointing, and how to hold hands when tasyahud; (2) the difference between the Shafii and Hambali schools in the prayer movement is caused by differences in taking, understanding, compromising and tarjih hadith.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Husaini Akhmad Hanafi Dain Yunta Ariesman M Bukhari, Imran Dian Novita Nur Firdaus, Aris Insan Kamil Mansyur Iskandar Iskandar Iskandar Iskandar Khaerul Aqbar Mochammad Imron Awalludin Mukran H. Usman Novira, Nuraeni Sirajuddin Sirajuddin