Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Serentak dalam Perspektif Keadilan Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi
AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Elections and Cyber Law
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v4i1.661

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has the authority to resolve disputes over the results of general elections and local elections. Trial process of election and local election result disputes is based on formal aspects which aim to fulfill formal legal certainty, but sometimes formal legal certainty overrides aspects of justice, for example by not examining lawsuit if they do not meet the formal requirements (fail at the dismissal stage) so that attention is needed so that formal procedures are carried out in the Constitutional Court guarantees material / substantial justice. This paper uses a type of doctrinal normative research. The author concludes that justice can be achieved by fulfilling formal and material truths. So far, the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over election results has prioritized formal truth by enforcing rules that are formal in nature, but formal truth does not necessarily reflect material truth. Even though the Constitutional Court upholds formal law, it is hoped that it will also uphold material law by not imposing a dismissal procedure , or even though there is, a dismissal procedure is applied after examining evidence.
CIDERA JANJI (WANPRESTASI) DALAM PERJANJIAN FIDUSIA BERDASARKAN PASAL 15 AYAT (3) UU NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi
AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Pandemi, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Kebijakan Publik
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v2i2.213

Abstract

Verdict of Constitution Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 makes a new reinterpretation to “breach of contract” or “default” based on article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 42 Year 1999 concerning Fidusiary Guarantee (hereinafter referred to “UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999”). Before the existence of this Constitution Court’s verdict, statement of “breach of contract” or “default”always be maked by creditor (as financing company) by his own opinion. This condition makes the creditor tend to act arbitrarily to the debtor which is in a weaker position. After the existence of constitution court’s verdict number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, “breach of contract” or “default” of the debtor must be determined based on the agreement between creditor dan debtor or it can be determined based on particular legal action, that’s by litigation procedure on court institution. This makes kreditor unable to to act arbitrarily anymore in determining of the debtor’s default.
Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Serentak dalam Perspektif Keadilan Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi
AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2023): Pemilihan Umum dan Hukum Siber
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v4i1.661

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has the authority to resolve disputes over the results of general elections and local elections. Trial process of election and local election result disputes is based on formal aspects which aim to fulfill formal legal certainty, but sometimes formal legal certainty overrides aspects of justice, for example by not examining lawsuit if they do not meet the formal requirements (fail at the dismissal stage) so that attention is needed so that formal procedures are carried out in the Constitutional Court guarantees material / substantial justice. This paper uses a type of doctrinal normative research. The author concludes that justice can be achieved by fulfilling formal and material truths. So far, the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over election results has prioritized formal truth by enforcing rules that are formal in nature, but formal truth does not necessarily reflect material truth. Even though the Constitutional Court upholds formal law, it is hoped that it will also uphold material law by not imposing a dismissal procedure , or even though there is, a dismissal procedure is applied after examining evidence.
Peningkatan Sumber Pendapatan Desa Pamegarsari Kecamatan Parung Kabupaten Bogor Said, Muhtar; Minan, Ahsanul; Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi; Lutfa, Asna; Ardiansyah, Alfan Rizki
Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Edisi Januari - Maret
Publisher : Lembaga Dongan Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55338/jpkmn.v6i2.5648

Abstract

Desa Pamegarsari merupakan desa yang berada di Kecamatan Parung Kabupaten Bogor mempunyai banyak asset yang bisa dimanfaatkan guna peningkatan pendapatan Desa. Namun potensi tersebut belum dikelola secara maksimal oleh karena itu Tim Pengabdian Masyarakat Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia tertarik untuk membantu memembuatkan peta dan strategi pengembangan aset-aset di Desa tersebut. Kegiatan dilaksanakan pada bulan Januari 2025 bertempat di Kantor Kepala Desa Pamegarsari. Hasil pendampingan tersebut bermasil memtakan dan membuat strategi terkait dengan pengembangan potensi pendapat desa tersebut dengan cara memaksimalkan keberadaan Setu Lebakwangi, Outbond Sapadia dan Taman Herbal Lebak Wangi.
Constitutional Court Verdict on "Error In Objecto" Lawsuit in Dispute Over Regional Election Results Rahmawati, Nurlaili; Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022): October
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2022.12.2.171-195

Abstract

Abstract:  The settlement of cases resulting from the Regional Head Election (Pilkada) is still within the authority of the Constitutional Court. In deciding this case, the Constitutional Court made explicit regulations regarding the procedural law of the trial as outlined in the Constitutional Court Regulations. One of the problems that arise in the examination (trial) of disputes over the results of the regional elections is that the application submitted by the losing party (applicant) turns out to be the wrong object (error in objecto). This error usually occurs because the object being sued is not the final decision on the election results. This research is a normative juridical research that aims to examine the attitudes and decisions of the Constitutional Court regarding requests for disputes over Regional Head Elections (Pilkada) that are Error In Objecto. The result of this study is that the Plaintiff in making the application must clearly not be mistaken in determining the object. In the case/dispute over the results of the regional elections, the object of the lawsuit is the final decree of the General Elections Commission regarding the determination of the results of the election results and not others. Accuracy in making posita and petitum is very important because wrong posita and petitum will lead to the wrong and fatal determination of the object of the application. When this is the issue, the Constitutional Court will not accept the application because it is not authorized. An error in determining the object of this application in procedural law is termed error in objecto, so accuracy as an applicant, respondent, or related party is needed. The recommendation given is that the plaintiff should be more careful in making applications and the revision of the application given by the Constitutional Court at the preliminary hearing, can be used by the applicant to correct his application so as not to incorrectly determine the object of the application/error in objecto.
Co-Authors Ardiansyah, Alfan Rizki Lutfa, Asna Minan, Ahsanul Muhtar Said, Muhtar Rahmawati, Nurlaili