Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Serentak dalam Perspektif Keadilan Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi
AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Elections and Cyber Law
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v4i1.661

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has the authority to resolve disputes over the results of general elections and local elections. Trial process of election and local election result disputes is based on formal aspects which aim to fulfill formal legal certainty, but sometimes formal legal certainty overrides aspects of justice, for example by not examining lawsuit if they do not meet the formal requirements (fail at the dismissal stage) so that attention is needed so that formal procedures are carried out in the Constitutional Court guarantees material / substantial justice. This paper uses a type of doctrinal normative research. The author concludes that justice can be achieved by fulfilling formal and material truths. So far, the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over election results has prioritized formal truth by enforcing rules that are formal in nature, but formal truth does not necessarily reflect material truth. Even though the Constitutional Court upholds formal law, it is hoped that it will also uphold material law by not imposing a dismissal procedure , or even though there is, a dismissal procedure is applied after examining evidence.
CIDERA JANJI (WANPRESTASI) DALAM PERJANJIAN FIDUSIA BERDASARKAN PASAL 15 AYAT (3) UU NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi
AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Pandemi, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Kebijakan Publik
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v2i2.213

Abstract

Verdict of Constitution Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 makes a new reinterpretation to “breach of contract” or “default” based on article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 42 Year 1999 concerning Fidusiary Guarantee (hereinafter referred to “UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999”). Before the existence of this Constitution Court’s verdict, statement of “breach of contract” or “default”always be maked by creditor (as financing company) by his own opinion. This condition makes the creditor tend to act arbitrarily to the debtor which is in a weaker position. After the existence of constitution court’s verdict number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, “breach of contract” or “default” of the debtor must be determined based on the agreement between creditor dan debtor or it can be determined based on particular legal action, that’s by litigation procedure on court institution. This makes kreditor unable to to act arbitrarily anymore in determining of the debtor’s default.
Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Serentak dalam Perspektif Keadilan Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi
AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2023): Pemilihan Umum dan Hukum Siber
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v4i1.661

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has the authority to resolve disputes over the results of general elections and local elections. Trial process of election and local election result disputes is based on formal aspects which aim to fulfill formal legal certainty, but sometimes formal legal certainty overrides aspects of justice, for example by not examining lawsuit if they do not meet the formal requirements (fail at the dismissal stage) so that attention is needed so that formal procedures are carried out in the Constitutional Court guarantees material / substantial justice. This paper uses a type of doctrinal normative research. The author concludes that justice can be achieved by fulfilling formal and material truths. So far, the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over election results has prioritized formal truth by enforcing rules that are formal in nature, but formal truth does not necessarily reflect material truth. Even though the Constitutional Court upholds formal law, it is hoped that it will also uphold material law by not imposing a dismissal procedure , or even though there is, a dismissal procedure is applied after examining evidence.
Peningkatan Sumber Pendapatan Desa Pamegarsari Kecamatan Parung Kabupaten Bogor Said, Muhtar; Minan, Ahsanul; Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi; Lutfa, Asna; Ardiansyah, Alfan Rizki
Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Edisi Januari - Maret
Publisher : Lembaga Dongan Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55338/jpkmn.v6i2.5648

Abstract

Desa Pamegarsari merupakan desa yang berada di Kecamatan Parung Kabupaten Bogor mempunyai banyak asset yang bisa dimanfaatkan guna peningkatan pendapatan Desa. Namun potensi tersebut belum dikelola secara maksimal oleh karena itu Tim Pengabdian Masyarakat Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia tertarik untuk membantu memembuatkan peta dan strategi pengembangan aset-aset di Desa tersebut. Kegiatan dilaksanakan pada bulan Januari 2025 bertempat di Kantor Kepala Desa Pamegarsari. Hasil pendampingan tersebut bermasil memtakan dan membuat strategi terkait dengan pengembangan potensi pendapat desa tersebut dengan cara memaksimalkan keberadaan Setu Lebakwangi, Outbond Sapadia dan Taman Herbal Lebak Wangi.