Articles
<![CDATA[Transparansi Keuangan Dalam Partai Politik ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhtar, Said]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) Vol 2 No 2 (2020): ISLRev ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES). ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (589.345 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v2i2.38528
<![CDATA[The aim of the article is to analyze financial transparency of the political parties. The methods used normative Juridical. Political parties are an important element of the state system in a country that adheres to the principle of democracy. Political parties can be a place for people to channel their aspirations, but increasingly. Therefore, as an important element in order democracy, political parties must begin to improve more transparent to the public about the management and use of party funds. Law No. 14 of 2008 has provided a standard for political parties wishing to uphold the agreement by making an Information Management and Documentation Officer (PPID).]]>
<![CDATA[Problems of Horizontal and Vertical Political Accountability of Elected Officials in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Said, Muhtar]]>;
<![CDATA[Minan, Ahasanul]]>;
<![CDATA[Huda, Muhammad Nurul]]>
<![CDATA[ JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Human Rights Issue in Various Context: National and Global Perspective ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/jils.v6i1.43403
<![CDATA[The accountability system for elected officials in Indonesia is inherently linked with the electoral system that is applied to unravel the problem in the context of a symmetrical system of people's sovereignty. This article analyzes the dynamics of the current regulations on the accountability system of elected officials. However, this article would only focus on the accountability system for regional leaders (governor, mayor and regent), regional legislators (DPRD) and the senatorial regional delegates (DPD) in Indonesia and the participation of constituencies in proposing a recall system. The purpose of this research is to construct an accountability mechanism for regional heads, DPRD and DPD to their constituents that are appropriate and in line with the electoral system applied in Indonesia. This research is expected to be a material for consideration for policy makers and the Indonesian people in general in designing an accountability system for elected officials that is appropriate and in line with the applied electoral system. To do such, this article is based on a descriptive study. Keywords: accountability, horizontal and vertical politics, direct democracy, elected officials, recall, Indonesian election]]>
<![CDATA[Problems of Horizontal and Vertical Political Accountability of Elected Officials in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Said, Muhtar]]>;
<![CDATA[Minan, Ahasanul]]>;
<![CDATA[Huda, Muhammad Nurul]]>
<![CDATA[ JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Human Rights Issue in Various Context: National and Global Perspective ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/jils.v6i1.43403
<![CDATA[The accountability system for elected officials in Indonesia is inherently linked with the electoral system that is applied to unravel the problem in the context of a symmetrical system of people's sovereignty. This article analyzes the dynamics of the current regulations on the accountability system of elected officials. However, this article would only focus on the accountability system for regional leaders (governor, mayor and regent), regional legislators (DPRD) and the senatorial regional delegates (DPD) in Indonesia and the participation of constituencies in proposing a recall system. The purpose of this research is to construct an accountability mechanism for regional heads, DPRD and DPD to their constituents that are appropriate and in line with the electoral system applied in Indonesia. This research is expected to be a material for consideration for policy makers and the Indonesian people in general in designing an accountability system for elected officials that is appropriate and in line with the applied electoral system. To do such, this article is based on a descriptive study. Keywords: accountability, horizontal and vertical politics, direct democracy, elected officials, recall, Indonesian election]]>
<![CDATA[Undang-Undang Minerba dalam Perspektif Kedaulatan Hatta ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhtar Said]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Vol 29, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Unissula ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26532/jh.v29i1.328
<![CDATA[Dampak berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 1967 menimbulkan kerugian yang besar bagi rakyat Indonesia, hal ini disebabkan adanya sistem kontrak karya bagi hasil terhadap ekploitasi pertambangan Indonesia. Berlakunya sistem kontrak karya tersebut telah mengikis arti kedaulatan Indonesia. Kedaulatan ekonomi yang dicetuskan Hatta pada saat perumusan Pasal 33 UUD 1945 menyatakan bahwa semua sumber daya alam Indonesia harus dikelola oleh rakyat Indonesia sendiri. Meskipun dalam pengelolaannya tidak melarang keikutsertaan investor asing untuk membantu, namun dengan penggunaan sistem kontrak karya dalam pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Indonesia tersebut seharusnya tidak memposisikan Indonesia sebagai pemilik sumber daya alam memiliki kedudukan yang sama dengan investor asing. Lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Mineral dan Batubara, sedikit memberikan angin segar untuk memulihkan kedaulatan ekonomi yang digagas oleh Hatta, karena dalam undang-undang ini mengubah cara-cara berbisnis. Sebelum berlakunya undang-undang ini, Indonesia masih menggunakan sistem kontrak kerja, tetapi setelah undang-undang ini berlaku sistem kontrak kerja di hilangkan dan beralih menjadi Ijin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP). Dalam IUP ini mewajibkan pengusaha atau perusahaan yang ingin menanamkan modalnya di Indonesia harus mengikuti dan tunduk pada peraturan-peraturan yang telah ditentukan oleh negara. Kata Kunci: Mineral dan Batubara, Kedaulatan, Hatta.]]>
<![CDATA[DASUN REMBANG: TENGGELAM DAN BANGKIT ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhtar Said]]>
<![CDATA[ AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 1 (2021): Pandemi, HAM dan Kebijakan Publik ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v2i1.176
<![CDATA[Desa Dasun merupakan desa yang mempunyai sejarah Panjang karena merupakan pintu masuk Kota Lasem, Rembang dari wilayah pesisir utara. Meskipun pernah meraih kejayaan karena menjadi pusat perekonomian pada zaman dahulu kemudian tenggelam oleh zaman. Namun seiring waktu Desa Dasun mulai menuju kebangkitan. Kata Kunci : Dasun, Lasem, Rembang]]>
<![CDATA[Tatanegara Madjapahit ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhtar Said]]>
<![CDATA[ AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2023): Elections and Cyber Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v4i1.668
<![CDATA[Dalam pengetahuan hukum hidup (Wyaharacastra) membagi aparat penegak hukum menjadi beberapa nama, yakni Hakim yang dikenal dengan “Adhyaksa”, sedangkan Juris (ahli) ilmu hukum hindu dimaknai sebagai Pragwiwaka. Sedangkan hukum yang ada dan diterapkan disebut dengan Decadrasta yakni kebiasaaan dalam suatu daerah. Penamaan pemanam ini merupakan penamaa dalam struktur hukum yang ada di kerajaan Majapahit pada waktu itu. Menariknya dalam sistem hukum yang diberlakukan di Kerajaan Majapahit atau kerajaan sebelumnya seperti Sriwijaya, sumpah menjadi hukum tertinggi dalam rantai penerapan hukum di Kerajaan Majapahit. Dalam hal ini, Yamin menuliskan mengenai kesaktian sumpah kesetiaan menjadi kunci utama dalam ketertiban bermasyarakat dan bernegara dalam kerajaan – kerajaan pada masa lampau. Sumpah kesetiaan kepada kerajaan menjadi tumpuan utama bahkan dicantumkan dalam sebuah prasasti kerajaan tersebut.]]>
<![CDATA[Tafsir Hakim Judex Facti dan Judex Juris Terkait Batas Maksimal Upaya Administratif ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhtar Said]]>;
<![CDATA[Erfandi Erfandi]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.4021
<![CDATA[To administrative effort in the form of an objection, a maximum time of 21 working days is given. However, there are differences in the application of these administrative efforts between judex facti judges and judex juris judges. Judex facti judges through decisions number 21/G/2020/PTUN and 76/B/2021/PT.TUN JKT implementing administrative measures are mandatory, this decision was upheld by judges at the State Administrative High Court. However, the decision was annulled by the judge judex juris (Supreme Court level) through decision number 420 K/TUN/2021. The basis for the judex juris to cancel the judex facti decision is based on the phrase "can" as stated in Article 75 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. So that administrative efforts through objections or administrative appeals are an option, not mandatory. Administrative efforts are efforts to realize the principles of Pancasila into the settlement of administrative problems, namely in the resolution of administrative problems so that they are first resolved through deliberation and consensus. If consensus deliberation cannot find a point of peace, it can be resolved through the State Administrative Court]]>
<![CDATA[KAJIAN AWAL KEDUDUKAN OMNIBUS LAW DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rusydi DR]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhtar Said]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Volume 2, Nomor 1, Maret 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Trisakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25105/ferenda.v2i1.18933
<![CDATA[As a state of law, Indonesia, which adheres to the Civil Law system, actually makes omnibus law which is a legal system of Common Law. The omnibus law is considered to be the answer to the overlapping of all existing laws and regulations in Indonesia. Omnibus Law if it is associated with the Legal System in Indonesia is contrary to the system that has been applied in Indonesia. There are 7 factions that agree and 2 factions that reject the discussion of the Omnibus Law Bill. In the process, Article 5 of Law No. 12 of 2011 and Law No. 15 of 2019 contains the principle of the formation of legislation, one of the problems in the formation of the Omnibus Law Bill is the principle of openness. This is because there are various indications, including the exclusion of groups related to or having an impact on this Omnibus Law Bill. There was also a member of the DPR who was supposed to be one of the working committees (Panja) to discuss the Omnibus Law Bill which was not involved because there was no notification. There is also a difference in the number of pages in the Omnibus Law Bill. In the regulations, referring to Law Number 12 of 2011 and Law Number 15 of 2019 concerning changes to the Formation of Laws, there are no clear norms and explanations regarding the Omnibus law process both in forming laws and revising laws. The absence of a legal basis for the formation of this omnibus law rules out the legitimacy of a law. Thus the position of Omnibus Law in Indonesia is not in accordance with the existing legal system in Indonesia, especially related to the Indonesian legal system (Civil Law) and Law Number 12 of 2011 and Law Number 15 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislation.]]>
<![CDATA[Tatanegara Madjapahit ]]>
<![CDATA[Said, Muhtar]]>
<![CDATA[ AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Elections and Cyber Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v4i1.668
<![CDATA[Dalam pengetahuan hukum hidup (Wyaharacastra) membagi aparat penegak hukum menjadi beberapa nama, yakni Hakim yang dikenal dengan “Adhyaksaâ€, sedangkan Juris (ahli) ilmu hukum hindu dimaknai sebagai Pragwiwaka. Sedangkan hukum yang ada dan diterapkan disebut dengan Decadrasta yakni kebiasaaan dalam suatu daerah. Penamaan pemanam ini merupakan penamaa dalam struktur hukum yang ada di kerajaan Majapahit pada waktu itu. Menariknya dalam sistem hukum yang diberlakukan di Kerajaan Majapahit atau kerajaan sebelumnya seperti Sriwijaya, sumpah menjadi hukum tertinggi dalam rantai penerapan hukum di Kerajaan Majapahit. Dalam hal ini, Yamin menuliskan mengenai kesaktian sumpah kesetiaan menjadi kunci utama dalam ketertiban bermasyarakat dan bernegara dalam kerajaan – kerajaan pada masa lampau. Sumpah kesetiaan kepada kerajaan menjadi tumpuan utama bahkan dicantumkan dalam sebuah prasasti kerajaan tersebut.]]>
<![CDATA[Bestuursdwang Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Preventif Pelanggaran Kode Etik Bagi Penyelenggara Pemilu ]]>
<![CDATA[Said, Muhtar]]>
<![CDATA[ AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Elections and Constitution ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Prodi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.47776/alwasath.v4i2.767
<![CDATA[Bestuurdwang merupakan tindakan reparatoir yang bisa dijadikan alat untuk mencegah adanya pelanggaran professional dalam penyelenggaraan pemilu. Profesional dalam menjalan tugas dan fungsi sebagai penyelanggara pemilu adalah menaati asas yang sudah ditentukan. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk untuk memberikan gambaran terkait pentingnya tindakan reparatoir dalam mencegah adanya kesalahan dalam pembuatan kebijakan. Sedangkan metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini menggunakan metode normatif, dimana sumber preimernya adalah undang-undang dan sumber skundernya adalah kepustakaan. Salah satu pelanggaran kode etik yakni penyelenggaran pemilu tidak melaksanakan tugas dan fungsi secara profesional. Artikel ini akan menganalisis penerapan bestuursdwang terhadap penyelenggara pemilu tingkat daerah sebagai upaya pencegahan pelanggaran etik. Ada problem yuridis dalam mekanisme seperti ini. Meskipun demikian penyelenggara pemilu tingkat pusat mempunyai wewenang untuk melakukan pengawasan dan kontrol terhadap penyelenggara pemilu tingkat daerah supaya tidak melakukan pelanngaran kode etik]]>
