Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.609
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Lingua Rima: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Britain International for Linguistics, Arts and Education Journal (BIoLAE Journal) Journal of Language Development and Linguistics Hortatori : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora
Siregar, Iskandarsyah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Language Development and Linguistics

 1 
Linguistics as Geopolitical Strategy: Framing, Legitimacy, and Power in Global Discourse Siregar, Iskandarsyah
Journal of Language Development and Linguistics Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jldl.v5i1.16344

Abstract

This study investigates the strategic function of linguistics in forming transnational geopolitical configurations from 2015 to 2025. The paper draws from 250 purposively sampled texts official speeches, media releases, and mainstream news and media coverage, from the US, Russia, China, and the European Union. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), semiotics, and linguistic pragmatics serve as the conceptual basis to explain how political elites employ discourse strategies to shape a global public opinion by using strategies such as framing, euphemism, delegitimising opponents' claims, and conceptual metaphors. Quantitatively, the study indicates framing (35%) and euphemism (28%) when utilised by the United States and China, respectively, served to strengthen legitimacy for foreign policy, to frame 'good' narratives, delegitimisation (22%) was used mainly by the EU and Russia to frame a good enemy, and conceptual metaphors (15%) - though the least used, were also effective in framing normative imperatives.
Co-Authors Aesnring , Blorg Alifia, Syifa Nur Amanda, Adhelia Putri Anjani, Sara Dwi Demidyuk, Lyudmila Ghaisani, Afrina Gual, Anatolie Hamzah, Nurul Huda Hsu, Forrest Kiesner , Robert Kurnia Rachmawati, Kurnia Pauji, Dicky Rachmat Purnama , Ade Riyan Purnama, Ade Riyan Putri, Olivia Megantari Siregar, Ramlan Susanto, Arju Wahyuni, Sri Suci Wardani, Esti Tri Xien li , Xu Yahaya, Samsur Rijal Yahya, Samsur Rijal Zulkarnain Zulkarnain