Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR TEKS FABEL PELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA PADA SISWA KELAS IV SDS AL-HIRA PERMATA NADIAH MEDAN Nasution, Niar; ., Sutikno; Hasibuan, Ahmad Laut; ., Harianto
Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, dan Asing Vol 7 No 1 (2024): Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah dan Asing
Publisher : LPPM Universitas PGRI Silampari Lubuklinggau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31540/silamparibisa.v7i1.2782

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan bahan ajar fabel untuk peserta didik kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yang menggunakan model pengembangan Borg and Gall yang terdiri dari 6 tahapan yaitu pengumpulan informasi, analysis, design awal, validasi prototipe, revisi prototipe, dan produk akhir. Hasil dari penelitian ini menghasilkan produk bahan ajar fabel pada pembelajaran bahasa indonesia bagi peserta didik. Dari hasil uji coba kelompok kecil para peserta didik sangat senang mengikuti pembelajaran menggunakan teks fabel, dan hasil wawancara guru kelas IV yaitu guru sangat menyukai proses pembelajaran yang dilakukan, saat uji coba siswa sangat antusias saat mengikuti pembelajaran. Berdasarkan proses pengembangan mulai dari validasi materi, penyajian, serta validasi kebahasaan hingga hasil uji coba kelompok kecil, secara keseluruhan disimpulkan bahwa produk bahan ajar fabel ini sangat baik digunakan. Selanjutnya hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa bahan ajar fabel pada pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia efektif untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar siswa.
Proportionality in Mandatory Green Building Certification: A Legal-Economic Analysis ., Sutikno; Wibowo, M. Agung; Soeharto, Achmad
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i2.3036

Abstract

The Mandatory green building certification has emerged as a central policy tool to advance sustainable development and reduce the environmental impacts of the construction sector, yet in Indonesia, it operates within a hybrid regulatory framework that combines statutory rules with non-state technical standards. This study examines whether such mandatory certification is legally sound, economically rational, and proportionate in relation to the burdens it imposes on regulated actors. Using a juridical–economic approach, the research integrates doctrinal legal analysis with public policy economics by examining national statutes, ministerial and regional regulations, and private certification standards, alongside academic literature and international policy reports. The analysis is conducted qualitatively through legal interpretation, cost–benefit reasoning, and a proportionality test based on the criteria of legitimate aim, suitability, necessity, and proportionality stricto sensu. The findings show that mandatory green building certification clearly pursues a legitimate public objective, environmental protection and sustainable development, but its implementation raises concerns about legal certainty and distributive justice. Reliance on non-state standards without explicit statutory delegation creates normative ambiguity, while significant upfront compliance costs for design, technology, and certification disproportionately affect small and medium-sized enterprises. As a result, the policy satisfies the requirement of a legitimate aim but does not fully meet the elements of necessity and proportionality in the strict sense, since it is not always the least restrictive or most balanced means of achieving environmental goals. The study’s novelty lies in its integrated legal–economic assessment of green building certification through the principle of proportionality, offering a holistic framework that evaluates environmental regulation not only as a matter of legal validity but also as an instrument of economic rationality and fair burden-sharing in public policy.