Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Priviet Social Sciences Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei
Muslih, Akhmad
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
MODEL KERUKUNAN DAN TOLERANSI ANTAR UMAT BERLAINAN AGAMA BERBASIS HUKUM ADAT ENGGANO PADA MASYARAKAT TERISOLIR DAN TERPENCIL DI PULAU ENGGANO Muslih, Akhmad; Sauni, Herawan; Sofyan, Tito; Susetyanto, Joko
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Vol 20 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jkutei.v20i2.20487

Abstract

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menjelaskan dan mendeskripsikan: model kerukunan dan toleransi antar pemeluk agama yang berbeda agama berdasarkan hukum adat Enggano. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan antropologi hukum. Teknik pengumpulan data adalah observasi, wawancara mendalam dan pengumpulan data sekunder. Penentuan informan dilakukan secara purposive, yaitu informan kunci ditentukan oleh peneliti sendiri berdasarkan pertimbangan memiliki pendidikan, jabatan, dan pengalaman yang memadai. Analisis data bersifat kualitatif, yang dilakukan secara terus menerus dari awal penelitian hingga akhir penelitian. Hasil penelitian adalah: model kerukunan dan toleransi antarumat beragama berdasarkan hukum adat pada masyarakat terpencil dan terpencil di Pulau Enggano, yang didasarkan dan berpedoman pada: (1) sejarah masuknya agama pada Pulau Enggano; (2) kehidupan sosial suku Enggano; (3) sistem kepemimpinan tradisional dalam kehidupan masyarakat suku Enggano; (4) sistem gotong royong (gotong royong) dalam kehidupan sosial masyarakat suku Enggano; dan (5) lembaga perdamaian adat untuk menjaga ketertiban dan ketahanan dalam kehidupan sosial masyarakat suku Enggano.Kata Kunci: Hukum Adat Enggano, Model Kerukunan dan Toleransi
Studi Perbandingan Pembagian Warisan Menurut Sistem Hukum Waris Adat Kaum Dengan Sistem Hukum Waris Islam Di Kecamatan Kota Mukomuko Kabupaten Mukomuko Muslih, Akhmad; Sauni, Herawan; Sofyan, Tito
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Vol 22 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jkutei.v22i2.31289

Abstract

This research aims to find knowledge about comparing inheritance distribution according to the traditional Kaum inheritance law system with the Islamic inheritance law system in Kota Mukomuko District, Mukomuko Regency. The method used is an empirical research method with comparative and qualitative approaches. The research results are as follows: First, in traditional inheritance, girls receive more inheritance assets than boys, except for high inheritance assets and sukang/soaring assets, because the people of Mukomuko City District adhere to the matrilineal principle in determining inheritance rights, low inheritance assets, livelihood assets, following matrilineal principles. Second, the division of inheritance in Islamic law has been stipulated in the Al-Qur'an in detail using mathematical calculations, as in the Al-Qur'an Surah An-Nisa verses (7), (11), (12), (33), and (176). Every heir from Dzawil Furudh, Ashabah, or Dzawil Arham gets a clear, systematic and unmixed share. In the principle of distribution of Islamic inheritance, sons receive a larger share than daughters; in principle, men are responsible for their children and wives; women have personal rights to their property, such as women's property from the results of their work, women's property is her property, apart from her husband's property. Third, the Kaum customary law system "privileges female heirs" with matrilineal principles, and the Islamic inheritance law system "privileges sons." there is an opinion that Islamic law follows patrilineal principles. The traditional Kaum inheritance law system is individual-collective. In contrast, the Islamic Law inheritance system is individual-bilateral, prioritizing balanced justice in life, placing the best and fairest principles in transferring a person's ownership after death to his heirs; all heirs get rights, without distinguishing between men and women, big or small.
Proof of marital seizure against joint property in a marriage resulting from divorce (A case study of decisions no. 533/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.Bn And No. 561/Pdt.G/2025/Pa.Krw) Rikal, Rikal; Muslih, Akhmad; Wafiya, Wafiya
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i11.897

Abstract

The marital beslag plays an important role in protecting common property. The urgency of submitting a marital beslag request was to protect the integrity of the communal property so that, during the process, neither the husband nor the wife could transfer the communal property to a third party. Sometimes, the marital beslag request might have been granted or denied by the judge. The purpose of this research was to understand and analyze the reasons why judges did not grant marital beslag requests, to understand and analyze the evidence of the marital beslag submitted by the plaintiff so that it could be accepted by the judge, and to examine and analyze Religious Court Decision Number 533/Pdt. G/2021/PA.Bn and Decision No. 561/Pdt. Bn. G/2025/PA.Krw regarding marital status. This study employs normative legal research. The research approach used in this thesis is legislative, conceptual, and case-based. The analysis results indicate that (1) In Decision Number 533/Pdt. G/2021/PA.Bn, a marital beslag could not be granted because the lawsuit was declared obscuur libel (vague/unclear), thus formally not meeting the requirements of legal proceedings (Article 8 RBg jo. Article 118 HIR). Meanwhile, in Decision No. 561/Pdt. G/2025/PA.Krw, the marital beslag was denied because the divorce lawsuit as the main matter was not materially proven, so the matter of joint property along with its marital beslag was automatically not accepted; (2) The requirements for accepting marital beslag are: the lawsuit must not be vague, the object of the dispute must be described in detail; there must be authentic evidence demonstrating that the property is joint property acquired during the marriage; there must be urgent reasons to protect the property from potential transfer or concealment; and the seizure must not harm third parties. Failure to meet these requirements, both formally and materially, results in the denial of the marital beslag request. The rejection of marital beslag in Decision Number 533/Pdt. G/2021/PA.Bn and Decision No. 561/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Krw emphasizes that a request for marital beslag could only be granted if it met the formal and material requirements according to the provisions of civil procedural law.
Co-Authors Rikal, Rikal SAUNI, HERAWAN Susetyanto, Joko Tito Sofyan wafiya wafiya, wafiya