Fadhilah, Muhammad Luthfie
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Uji Beda Keuntungan pada Usaha Gula Kelapa di Desa Pageraji Kabupaten Banyumas Jawa Tengah Cahyaningtyas, Nur Indah; Rahmaningtyas, Avivah; Putri, Levana Masitajasmin; Fadhilah, Muhammad Luthfie; Novitaningrum, Restie; Fauziah, Irma
Mimbar Agribisnis : Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis Vol 11, No 1 (2025): Januari 2025
Publisher : Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/ma.v11i1.17511

Abstract

The comparison between molded coconut sugar and crystal coconut sugar is in the production costs incurred such as the cooking process for crystal coconut sugar is longer than molded coconut sugar. In addition, the comparison of selling prices between the two causes different incomes, the income obtained affects the profits of the artisans. This study aims to examine the differences in profits of the molded coconut sugar and crystal coconut sugar business. The research method used is survey.The sample size determination was using simple random sampling method with the sample size obtained was 65 molded coconut sugar artisans and 39 crystal coconut sugar artisans. The data analysis method used was descriptive analysis and comparative profit analysis molded coconut sugar and crystal coconut sugar. The average profit received by artisans in the molded coconut sugar business is Rp1.064.123.00 per month with an R/C value of 1,55, while the average profit received by artisans in the crystal coconut sugar business is Rp1.449.228.00 per month with an R/C value of 1,71. The analysis of the difference in profit test resulted in a real difference in profit between the molded coconut sugar and crystal coconut sugar businesses. This difference in profit is caused by differences in the average selling price, production volume, revenue, production costs of molded coconut sugar artisans and crystal coconut sugar artisans.
Risiko Produksi Usahatani Jagung di Lahan Kering Kabupaten Karanganyar Novitaningrum, Restie; Wahyuningrum, Dinar; Simamora, Liska; Cahyaningtyas, Nur Indah; Putri, Levana Masitajasmin; Rahmaningtyas, Avivah; Fadhilah, Muhammad Luthfie; Fauziah, Irma
Mimbar Agribisnis : Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis Vol 11, No 2 (2025): Juli 2025
Publisher : Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/ma.v11i2.18045

Abstract

Maize is a strategic commodity with growing demand; however, domestic productivity faces challenges due to the limited availability of high-quality seeds, fertilizers, and other production inputs. Analyzing production risk in maize farming is essential for identifying factors contributing to yield uncertainty. This study examines the factors influencing maize production risk in dryland farming in Karanganyar Regency using a multiple linear regression model with the heteroscedasticity approach by Just and Pope, based on a sample of 60 farmers. The results indicate that the production risk of maize in Karanganyar's dryland areas, as reflected by a coefficient of variation of 24.08%, is relatively low. Production risk is significantly influenced by fertilizer application and labor input. Phonska, SP-36, and urea fertilizers have a notable impact that helps mitigate production risk. Additionally, labor input is crucial in determining crop yields, with greater labor availability correlating with lower production risk for farmers. In contrast, maize seeds, land area, organic fertilizers, and pesticides insignificantly affect production risk. These findings highlight the importance of effective agricultural input management, particularly the selection of appropriate fertilizers and labor optimization, in reducing uncertainty in maize production.
Volatilitas Harga Jagung dan Integrasi Pasar di Indonesia Fadhilah, Muhammad Luthfie; Putri, Levana Masitajasmin; Fauziah, Irma; Cahyaningtyas, Nur Indah; Rahmaningtyas, Avivah; Novitaningrum, Restie; Simamora, Liska
Mimbar Agribisnis : Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis Vol 11, No 2 (2025): Juli 2025
Publisher : Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/ma.v11i2.19801

Abstract

Maize is the main raw material for animal feed, and weakening maize prices have a significant impact on the prices of livestock products such as chicken and eggs. The high demand for animal feed can drive up maize prices. Keywords: Volatility, Integration, Market, Maize Price. This condition is further exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic, disruptions to the global supply chain, distribution regulations, and economic instability have caused maize price volatility to increase sharply. The purpose of this study is to analyze maize price volatility and market integration at the producer, consumer and world levels. This study uses secondary data obtained from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS), Ministry of Trade, Ministry of Agriculture, Food Prices and the World Bank. The data analysis used is the coefficient of variation and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM). The results show that maize price volatility at the producer and consumer levels is relatively low, while at the world level it is high. The results of the integration analysis obtained prices at the producer, consumer, and world levels have long-term integration. Only consumer maize prices (HJK) significantly adjust in the short term to long-term sufficiency. Maize prices at the consumer level are greatly influenced by producer prices, which indicates that vertical price transmission from producers to consumers is quite strong. The influence of world prices exists, but is relatively small and indirect. Production costs, input availability, and market channels are the main factors in determining maize prices at the producer level. Efficient marketing channels can result in better price realization for farmers so that farmers get better profits. The government must be able to maintain a good farming climate for farmers