Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kondisi Aksi Pengungsi Dan Pencari Suaka Terhadap Implementasi Perpres No. 125 Tahun 2016 Rasyid, Moh. Arpat
Jurnal Ilmiah Ecosystem Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022): ECOSYSTEM Vol. 22 No 2, Mei - Agustus Tahun 2022
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35965/eco.v22i2.1560

Abstract

Keberadaan pengungsi dan pencari suaka di Indonesia bukanlah hal baru, meskipun Indonesia belum meratifikasi Konvensi Pengungsi 1951 dan Protokol 1967, yang berarti seharusnya bukan menjadi kewajiban Indonesia untuk mengurus mereka. Dalam menghadapi masalah tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan metode empiris dan normatif empiris untuk menggambarkan masalah yang diteliti. Peninjauan kembali penempatan Pengungsi dan Pencari Suaka di Rumah Detensi Imigrasi berdasarkan UU No. 6 Tahun 2011 dan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 125 Tahun 2016. The existence of refugees and asylum seekers in Indonesia is not new, even though Indonesia has not ratified the 1951 Convention on Refugees and the 1967 Protocol, which means it should not be Indonesia's obligation to take care of them. In dealing with these problems, this study uses an empirical and normative empirical method to describe the problem under study. Review the placement of refugees and asylum seekers in the Immigration Detention Center under Law no. 6 of 2011 and Presidential Regulation No. 125 the Year 2016.
Navigating constitutional amendments between aspiration and under-standing substance Muhtar, Mohamad Hidayat; Mallarangeng, Andi Bau; Rasyid, Moh. Arpat; Saharuddin, Saharuddin
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 14 No. 5 (2025): December: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v14i4.1461

Abstract

Constitutional amendments serve as the primary mechanism that guarantees the fundamental law's relevance amidst social, political, and economic changes. In the Indonesian context, this process consistently involves a conflict between public ambitions, representing the collective will, and the need to uphold the consistency and integrity of fundamental values. This research employs a normative juridical method, including philosophical and conceptual analysis, to investigate the interplay between popular desires and the comprehension of content, while also evaluating the possible hazards associated with amendments influenced by transient populist or elitist conservatism. The study's findings indicate that public ambitions provide significant social legitimacy for change; but, without a comprehension of content, modifications may disregard the concept of justice and jeopardize the stability of the legal system. Conversely, a strategy that prioritizes content while neglecting the desires of the populace jeopardizes the constitution's relevance to social reality. The equilibrium of the two necessitates an inclusive deliberative framework, ongoing constitutional education, and the sophistication of political culture. Consequently, seeing the constitution as a collective social compact is essential to ensure that constitutional change transcends immediate political reactions and evolves into a strategic initiative to fortify democracy and achieve real justice.