Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Menjerakan Pelaku "Uang Mahar" Pemilu Amsari, Feri; Febrinandez, Hemi Lavour
Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): INTEGRITAS Volume 05 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (876.204 KB) | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v5i1.412

Abstract

“Uang Mahar” (Dowry for Candidacy) as a condition to be nominated by the party has damaged the purpose of the election. The resulting government tends to be corrupt. So, the prevention of dowry money practices in elections is very important. Efforts to stop it cannot rely on voters by suggesting they do not choose corrupt politicians or who use money politics. Voters tend to be permissive. Corruption perpetrators are often forgiven in elections by choosing them once again, especially politicians who practice dowry politics. The entrapment of the dowry perpetrators is to eliminate their political rights, whether the right to vote or the right to be nominated, and apply more severe penalties to the perpetrators. This method is considered capable of changing the practice of dowry politics in Indonesian democracy. Keywords: Corruption, Dowry for Candidacy, Election
Malpraktik Pemilu dan Korupsi: Analisis terhadap Proses Penghitungan dan Rekapitulasi pada Pemilu Indonesia 2019 Husin, Luthfi Hamzah; Pratama, Heroik Mutaqin; Prasetyo, Wegik; Hendra, Hendra; Darmawan, Wawan Budi; Manan, Firman; Amsari, Feri
Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.720

Abstract

This article attempts to examine the relationship between election malpractice and corruption by focusing on analyzing frauds in the vote counting and recapitulation process in the 2019 Indonesian Election, specifically in the legislative election. This study tries to fill in the gaps in literature that examines electoral malpractice in Indonesia which is seen more at the campaign stage rather than the vote counting and recapitulation stages in which the role of election management body is very central. To analyze this, this study analyses more specifically the involvement of the General Election Commission (KPU) as election organizer in electoral malpractice. Using document analysis and case study method, this study found that the vote recapitulation stage, especially at the district level, is the most prone phase to electoral malpractice where the involvement of the ad-hoc election administrator and candidates’ witness play an important role there.
Hak Pilih Kelompok Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019 Di Sumatera Barat Henny Andriani; Feri Amsari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (549.305 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1744

Abstract

In the voting process at elections, the people who vote in the elections believe they can influence the actions of those who are authorized to make binding decisions. In other words, they believe that what they are doing has a political effect (political efficiency). So it is an important thing to protect the political rights of all citizens, including the voting rights owned by groups of people with disabilities. Based on the above background, there are at least two problem formulations that can be used as a fence in this research, namely What are the problems and violations of the rights of groups of persons with disabilities in the 2019 General Election ?; and How are the rights of groups of persons with disabilities protected in the 2019 General Election in West Sumatra?
Hak Pilih Kelompok Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019 Di Sumatera Barat Henny Andriani; Feri Amsari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (549.305 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1744

Abstract

In the voting process at elections, the people who vote in the elections believe they can influence the actions of those who are authorized to make binding decisions. In other words, they believe that what they are doing has a political effect (political efficiency). So it is an important thing to protect the political rights of all citizens, including the voting rights owned by groups of people with disabilities. Based on the above background, there are at least two problem formulations that can be used as a fence in this research, namely What are the problems and violations of the rights of groups of persons with disabilities in the 2019 General Election ?; and How are the rights of groups of persons with disabilities protected in the 2019 General Election in West Sumatra?
Judicial Order Sebagai Penguatan Sifat Final Dan Mengikat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum Mutiara Miyonita; Arfiani; Feri Amsari
Lareh Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Lareh Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/llr.2.1.85-95.2024

Abstract

The authority of the Constitutional Court in the judicial review against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) is stated in Article 24C paragraph (3). One of the most frequently proposed judicial review is Law Number 7 of 2017 about General Elections (Election Law). The result of this review is the Constitutional Court's decision which is final, so no other legal action can be taken after the decision is issued. However, in reality the Constitutional Court's decision regarding the Judicial review of Election Laws experienced various problems in its execution which were referred to as constitutional disobedience . In other countries such as Germany, the Federal Constitutional Court uses the concept of judicial order to resolve this problem. The judicial order is an important message for the future Legislature to implement the Constitutional Court's decision through concrete follow-up. Formulation of the problem raised in this research First, what is the urgency of using a judicial order in the Constitutional Court Decision in the Election Law judicial Review? Second, what are the differences in the implementation of Constitutional Court Decisions containing judicial orders in judicial reviewing of the Election Law? The type of research used is normative juridical. Data collection techniques use library research. Data will be analyzed using qualitative analytical descriptive methods. The research results explain that in order to realize legal certainty in order to carry out direct, public, free, secret, honest and fair elections, this Constitutional Court Decision needs to be implemented immediately. For that reason, judicial orders that have been implemented by the Indonesian Constitutional Court and other countries prove its function in strengthening the final and binding effect of its decisions. Differences in the implementation of Constitutional Court decisions that contain judicial orders can be seen in several non-self-executing decisions, there are decisions that are fully implemented, partially implemented, not implemented and also implemented differently from orders from Constitutional Court decisions
Accountability Dysfunction 
in Campaign Finance Regulations: A Case Study of the 2018 Jambi Simultaneous General Elections Kabullah, Muhammad Ichsan; Amsari, Feri; Arifin, Wein; Misra, Fauzan
Jurnal Bina Praja Vol 12 No 2 (2020): Pemilihan Kepala Daerah
Publisher : Research and Development Agency Ministry of Home Affairs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21787/jbp.12.2020.225-236

Abstract

The regulations of campaign finance have highly problematic for local electios (Pilkada) in Indonesia. However, the campaign finance system changed gradually over the following years, many alleged campaign violations committed by candidates during local elections. In this study, the researcher wants to assess campaign finance regulations based on the accountability concept. The measurement of accountability in the campaign finance regulations has been divided into two perspectives, which are legal and finance. The study used a qualitative method with a case study approach in Jambi's three regions, which held local elections (Pilkada) in 2018. This study argues that the current regulations have not solved the whole problem of campaign funds. The level of corruption by candidates remains stubbornly high due to less authority and weak sanctions. At the same time, most campaign finance regulations have never been enforced. As a result, revising Acts on the election, enhancing law enforcement, and raising public awareness need to promote for ensuring the quality of local democracy.