Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination at different hypothetical efficacy and safety levels in ten countries in Asia, Africa, and South America Rosiello, Dott F.; Anwar, Samsul; Yufika, Amanda; Adam, Rashed Y.; Ismaeil, Mohajer IH.; Ismail, Asma Y.; Dahman, Nesrine BH.; Hafsi, Montacer; Ferjani, Manel; Sami, Farah S.; Monib, Fatma A; R, Subramaniam; Anandu, Sunil; Haque, Md Ariful; Ferreto, Lirane ED.; Aburto, José TO.; Rojas, Jorge ET.; Enitan, Seyi S.; Yomi, Akele R.; Ezigbo, Eyiuche D.; Babadi, Elham; Kakemam, Edris; Malik, Najma I.; Ullah, Irfan; Sallam, Malik
Narra J Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): December 2021
Publisher : Narra Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52225/narra.v1i3.55

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy, defined as the reluctance or rejection in receiving a vaccine despite its availability, represents a major challenge to global health efforts aiming to control the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the possible factors correlated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy using a refined well-informed approach can be helpful to address the phenomenon. The current study aimed to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rates using four hypothetical scenarios of varying levels of vaccine efficacy and safety profiles in ten Asian, African and South American countries. These scenarios included: 95% efficacy and 20% side effects (Vaccine A), 75% efficacy and 5% side effects (Vaccine B); 75% efficacy and 20% side effects (Vaccine C) and 50% efficacy and 5% side effects (Vaccine D). This study used a self-administered online survey that was distributed during February–May 2021. The total number of study respondents was 1337 with countries of residence as follows: India (21.1%), Pakistan (12.9%), Sudan (11.2%), Nigeria (9.3%), Iran (8.2%), Bangladesh and Brazil (7.9%), Chile (7.7%), Tunisia (7.6%), and Egypt (6.2%). The overall acceptance rates for COVID-19 vaccination were variable based on varying degrees of safety and efficacy as follows: 55.6% for Vaccine C, 58.3% for Vaccine D, 74.0% for Vaccine A and 80.1% for Vaccine B. The highest levels of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance were observed in Brazil followed by Chile across the four different safety and efficacy scenarios. The lowest COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rates were reported in Egypt and Tunisia for the low safety scenarios (20% side effects), and the low efficacy scenario (50% efficacy). The study revealed the potential effect of vaccine safety and efficacy on the intention to get COVID-19 vaccination. At the same efficacy level, higher possibility of side effects caused a large drop in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate. This indicates the importance of accurate communication regarding vaccine safety and efficacy on attitude towards the vaccine and intentions to get vaccinated. Regional differences in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance were observed with the Middle East/North African countries showing the lowest rates and the South American countries displaying the highest vaccine acceptance rates.
Willingness-to-pay for COVID-19 vaccine in ten low-middle-income countries in Asia, Africa and South America: A cross-sectional study Sallam, Malik; Anwar, Samsul; Yufika, Amanda; Fahriani, Marhami; Husnah, Milda; Kusuma, Hendrix I.; Raad, Rawan; Khiri, Namareg ME.; Abdalla, Rashed YA.; Adam, Rashed Y.; Ismaeil, Mohajer IH.; Ismail, Asma Y.; Kacem, Wajdi; Teyeb, Zeineb; Aloui , Khaoula; Hafsi , Montacer; Dahman, Nesrine Ben Hadj; Ferjani, Manel; Deeb, Dalia; Emad , Dina; Sami, Farah S.; Abbas, Kirellos Said; Monib, Fatma A.; R , Subramaniam; Panchawagh, Suhrud; Sharun, Khan; Anandu, Sunil; Gachabayov, Mahir; Haque , Md A.; Emran, Talha B.; Wendt, Guilherme W.; Ferreto, Lirane ED.; Castillo-Briones, María F.; Inostroza-Morales, Rocío B.; Lazcano-Díaz, Sebastián A.; Ordóñez-Aburto, José T.; Troncoso-Rojas, Jorge E.; Balogun, Emmanuel O.; Yomi, Akele R.; Durosinmi, Abiodun; Adejumo, Esther N.; Ezigbo, Eyiuche D.; Arab-Zozani, Morteza; Babadi, Elham; Kakemam, Edris; Ullah, Irfan; Malik, Najma I.; Dababseh, Deema; Rosiello, Francesco; Enitan , Seyi S.
Narra J Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): April 2022
Publisher : Narra Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52225/narra.v2i1.74

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is considered as one of the greatest challenges to control the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A related challenge is the unwillingness of the general public to pay for vaccination. The objective of this study was to determine willingness-to-pay (WTP) for COVID-19 vaccine among individuals from ten low-middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, Africa, and South America. Data were collected using an online questionnaire distributed during February - May 2021 in ten LMICs (Bangladesh, Brazil, Chile, Egypt, India, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Sudan, and Tunisia). The major response variable of in this study was WTP for a COVID-19 vaccine. The assessment of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was based on items adopted from the World Health Organization (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) vaccine hesitancy scale constructs. In this study, 1337 respondents included in the final analysis where the highest number of respondents was from India, while the lowest number was from Egypt. A total of 88.9% (1188/1337) respondents were willing to pay for the COVID-19 vaccination, and 11.1% (149/1337) were not. The average WTP for COVID-19 vaccination was 87.9 US dollars ($), (range: $5-$200). The multivariate model analysis showed that the country, monthly household income, having a history of respiratory disease, the agreement that routine vaccines recommended by health workers are beneficial and having received the flu vaccination within the previous 12 months were strongly associated with the WTP. Based on the country of origin, the highest mean WTP for COVID-19 vaccine was reported in Chile, while the lowest mean WTP for the vaccine was seen among the respondents from Sudan. The availability of free COVID-19 vaccination services appears as a top priority in the LMICs for successful control of the ongoing pandemic. This is particularly important for individuals of a lower socio-economic status. The effects of complacency regarding COVID-19 extends beyond vaccine hesitancy to involve less willingness to pay for COVID-19 vaccine and a lower value of WTP for the vaccine.
Polymorphisms of RS7055763 and RS41307258 in TBX22 Gene Haplotype as Risk Factors for Non-syndromic Cleft Palate Indonesian Deutero-Malay Population Susanti, Nita; Ullah, Irfan; Sulaksono, Haura Labibah Salsabil; Nasroen, Saskia Lenggogeni; Maskoen, Ani Melani
Global Medical & Health Communication (GMHC) Vol 12, No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/gmhc.v12i3.13677

Abstract

Non-syndromic cleft palate (NS-CP) is a multifactorial congenital malformation affected by genetic and environmental factors. The incidence of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NS-CLP) varies considerably between ethnic groups and geographical regions. TBX22 is a crucial determinant for the formation of intramembranous bone in the posterior hard palate. Therefore, TBX22 is fundamental to palatogenesis and supports normal palate progress. The rs7055763 and rs41307258 polymorphisms in the TBX22 gene are associated with risk factors for NS-CP in the Indonesian Deutero-Malay population. In the previous study, NS-CP still needed to be investigated in the Deutero-Malay population. However, there are different races, mainly for the Deutero-Malay population. This study aims to determine whether rs7055763 and rs41307258 polymorphisms in the TBX22 gene are risk factors for NS-CP in the Deutero-Malay population. This study was conducted in Terpadu Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, from February until June 2023. The design of this study was a case-control study. The DNA patient samples were obtained from saliva and whole blood. Moreover, DNA is extracted, and the rs7055763 and rs41307258 segments are analyzed using PCR and Sanger sequencing. PCR data was analyzed by chi-square testing. In this study analysis, polymorphisms of rs7055763 (G>A) and rs41307258 (T>A) in the TBX22 gene show no significant differences between case and control groups, namely 0.911 and 0.645, respectively. However, the genotype in the rs41307258 shows the p-value as 0.027, indicating substantial differences and the OR is 1.390. In conclusion, the rs7055763 and rs41307258 polymorphisms in the TBX22 gene do not appear to be risk factors for developing NS-CP in the Indonesian Deutero-Malay population.
The Role of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Platelet-derived Growth Factor, Epidermal Growth Factor, Insulin-like Growth Factor, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, and Sonic Hedgehog in the Non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate development: A Scoping Review Ullah, Irfan; Khan, Muhammad Salman; Nasroen, Saskia Lenggogeni; Maskoen, Ani Melani; Sarilita, Erli
Chimica et Natura Acta Vol 12, No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Departemen Kimia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/cna.v12.n3.51493

Abstract

Non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCLP) birth defect, it imposes an enormous stress on society and requires nutrition, dental, speech, behavioural, and surgical therapies. The NSCLP multifactorial aetiology, including the environment and genetic factors. The environment and genetic factors affect the cellular mechanism, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and cell migration and signalling pathways. Genetic growth factors including Transforming Growth Factor-Beta (TGF-β), Fibroblast Growth factors (FGFs), Platelet-derived Growth factors (PDGFs), Epidermal Growth factor (EGF), Insulin-like growth factors (IGF), Vascular Endothelial Growth factor (VEGF), Sonic Hedgehog (SHH). The study aims to understand the role of the growth factors “TGF-β, FGFs, PDGFs, EGF, IGF, VEGF, and SHH” in NSCLP development. Preferential Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards were followed when performing this scoping review. The 942 articles were extracted, and the following inclusion and exclusive criteria 43 articles were eligible for review. Twenty-seven studies identify 26 genes and 25 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)/variants of the growth factors that are a significant risk for NSCLP development. In conclusion, the analysis of diverse populations and growth factors including TGF-β, FGFs, PDGFs, EGF, IGF, VEGF, and SHH were associated with NSCLP. The growth factors were involved in the cellular mechanism, cell proliferation, cell differentiation cell migration and signalling pathways that lead to the pathogenesis of NSCLP.