Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Virological and Clinical Studies of Viral Hemorrhagic Fever (VHF): A Systematic Literature Review Fadrian; Armen Ahmad; Zaki Mahmudi Dasril
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 9 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v8i9.1065

Background: Viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) is a group of zoonotic diseases caused by various RNA viruses, such as Ebola, Marburg, Lassa, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), and Dengue. VHF poses a serious threat to global public health due to high morbidity and mortality rates. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review of virological and clinical studies of VHF to understand the characteristics of the virus, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, risk factors, diagnosis, and current therapeutic options. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies published between 2018 and 2024. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated for quality and narratively synthesized. Results: This review included 20 studies involving 2,350 VHF patients. Results demonstrated significant diversity in virologic characteristics, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations among different types of VHF. These studies also highlight advances in molecular and serological diagnosis, as well as the development of antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies. Conclusion: This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive summary of current knowledge regarding the virology and clinical practice of VHF. These findings may guide the development of more effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies for this life-threatening disease.

Meta-Analysis of Corticosteroids in the Management of Sepsis: Evaluating Efficacy and Safety Harvindra, Astrid; Armen Ahmad
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 11 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v8i11.1118

Background: Sepsis remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Corticosteroids have been used in sepsis management, but their efficacy and safety remain debated. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of corticosteroids in sepsis management. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2018 to 2024 evaluating corticosteroid use in sepsis. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and adverse events. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Twenty-one RCTs (n=12,350 patients) were included. Corticosteroid therapy was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.96, p=0.004). There was also a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD] -1.5 days, 95% CI -2.3 to -0.7, p<0.001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -1.2 days, 95% CI -1.9 to -0.5, p<0.001). No significant increase in adverse events was observed. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that corticosteroid therapy is associated with a significant reduction in mortality, length of hospital stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with sepsis. The benefits appear to outweigh the risks. Corticosteroids should be considered as part of the standard of care in sepsis management.

Virological and Clinical Studies of Viral Hemorrhagic Fever (VHF): A Systematic Literature Review Fadrian; Armen Ahmad; Zaki Mahmudi Dasril
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 9 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v8i9.1065

Background: Viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) is a group of zoonotic diseases caused by various RNA viruses, such as Ebola, Marburg, Lassa, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), and Dengue. VHF poses a serious threat to global public health due to high morbidity and mortality rates. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review of virological and clinical studies of VHF to understand the characteristics of the virus, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, risk factors, diagnosis, and current therapeutic options. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies published between 2018 and 2024. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated for quality and narratively synthesized. Results: This review included 20 studies involving 2,350 VHF patients. Results demonstrated significant diversity in virologic characteristics, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations among different types of VHF. These studies also highlight advances in molecular and serological diagnosis, as well as the development of antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies. Conclusion: This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive summary of current knowledge regarding the virology and clinical practice of VHF. These findings may guide the development of more effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies for this life-threatening disease.

Meta-Analysis of Corticosteroids in the Management of Sepsis: Evaluating Efficacy and Safety Harvindra, Astrid; Armen Ahmad
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 11 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v8i11.1118

Background: Sepsis remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Corticosteroids have been used in sepsis management, but their efficacy and safety remain debated. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of corticosteroids in sepsis management. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2018 to 2024 evaluating corticosteroid use in sepsis. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and adverse events. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Twenty-one RCTs (n=12,350 patients) were included. Corticosteroid therapy was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.96, p=0.004). There was also a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD] -1.5 days, 95% CI -2.3 to -0.7, p<0.001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -1.2 days, 95% CI -1.9 to -0.5, p<0.001). No significant increase in adverse events was observed. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that corticosteroid therapy is associated with a significant reduction in mortality, length of hospital stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with sepsis. The benefits appear to outweigh the risks. Corticosteroids should be considered as part of the standard of care in sepsis management.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search