Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tribakti: jurnal pemikiran keIslaman Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum
Al-Akiti, Muhammad Ayman
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Revisiting Ibn Rushd's Demonstrative Philosophy: Bridging Classical Thought and Scientific Integration in Contemporary Islamic Higher Education Muwaffiqillah, Moch.; Zulfa, Indana; al-Akiti, Muhammad Ayman
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 36 No. 1 (2025): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v36i1.6628

Abstract

This article aims to examine the thoughts of Ibn Rushd, particularly regarding the concept of the relationship between Sharia (religion) and Hikmah (philosophy) through the principle of double truth, and to explore its potential as a philosophical foundation for the development of integrative knowledge in Islamic Religious Higher Education (PTKI). This study also seeks to address the stigma that views Ibn Rushd as being in opposition to Islamic orthodoxy as upheld by al-Ghazali. By employing a qualitative approach through content analysis of Ibn Rushd’s major works on demonstrative philosophy (burhani reasoning), this research explores the relevance of his thought in integrating religious and general sciences within PTKI. A contextual analysis is conducted to understand the challenges and opportunities for applying his philosophy in Indonesia, where it has received relatively little attention compared to the Western world. The findings indicate that Ibn Rushd’s demonstrative philosophy, which emphasizes demonstrative logic and empirical observation, offers a robust methodological framework to support the integration of knowledge within PTKI. The burhani approach can serve as an epistemological foundation that bridges the dichotomy between religious and general sciences while contributing to the development of a holistic curriculum. This study provides a theoretical contribution by reaffirming the relevance of Ibn Rushd’s thought in shaping a rational and empirical paradigm of Islamic higher education. Additionally, it opens a space for discussion on the role of Islamic philosophy in addressing the challenges of religious education in the modern era.
Revisiting Ibn Rushd's Demonstrative Philosophy: Bridging Classical Thought and Scientific Integration in Contemporary Islamic Higher Education Muwaffiqillah, Moch.; Zulfa, Indana; al-Akiti, Muhammad Ayman
Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Vol. 36 No. 1 (2025): Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti (UIT) Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/tribakti.v36i1.6628

Abstract

This article aims to examine the thoughts of Ibn Rushd, particularly regarding the concept of the relationship between Sharia (religion) and Hikmah (philosophy) through the principle of double truth, and to explore its potential as a philosophical foundation for the development of integrative knowledge in Islamic Religious Higher Education (PTKI). This study also seeks to address the stigma that views Ibn Rushd as being in opposition to Islamic orthodoxy as upheld by al-Ghazali. By employing a qualitative approach through content analysis of Ibn Rushd’s major works on demonstrative philosophy (burhani reasoning), this research explores the relevance of his thought in integrating religious and general sciences within PTKI. A contextual analysis is conducted to understand the challenges and opportunities for applying his philosophy in Indonesia, where it has received relatively little attention compared to the Western world. The findings indicate that Ibn Rushd’s demonstrative philosophy, which emphasizes demonstrative logic and empirical observation, offers a robust methodological framework to support the integration of knowledge within PTKI. The burhani approach can serve as an epistemological foundation that bridges the dichotomy between religious and general sciences while contributing to the development of a holistic curriculum. This study provides a theoretical contribution by reaffirming the relevance of Ibn Rushd’s thought in shaping a rational and empirical paradigm of Islamic higher education. Additionally, it opens a space for discussion on the role of Islamic philosophy in addressing the challenges of religious education in the modern era.
Prenuptial Agreement Between Indonesia and South Korea Regulations Asmarani, Abiyyah Indi; Hariyana, Trinas Dewi; Hasyim, Moch. Wachid; Al-Akiti, Muhammad Ayman
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): July-December
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v4i2.52092

Abstract

This study examines the legal frameworks governing prenuptial agreements in Indonesia and South Korea, offering a comparative analysis between a developing and a developed nation in Asia. It explores cultural and societal attitudes that shape perceptions of such agreements in both jurisdictions. In South Korea, prenuptial agreements are also widely used. However, South Korea has one of the world's lowest fertility rates, partly due to a declining interest in marriage. The research aims to evaluate regulatory frameworks, their impact on property arrangements, and the key similarities and differences in legal applications. Adopting study analyzes statutory laws, court decisions, expert opinions, and relevant literature. The comparative analysis highlights how both civil law systems address prenuptial agreements, focusing on property rights, joint assets, and marital obligations. Findings reveal that Indonesian regulations emphasize strict formality and limited scope, mainly addressing property, while South Korea permits broader flexibility and judicial discretion, including spousal support and child custody. The study concludes that while prenuptial agreements are legally binding in both countries, enforcement and societal acceptance differ significantly. It recommends harmonizing legal frameworks to ensure fairness and adaptability, especially in cross-national marriages. Indonesia could adopt South Korea's flexible enforcement practices, while South Korea might benefit from stricter formal requirements for consistency. Such reforms could enhance the effectiveness of prenuptial agreements as tools for legal clarity and marital stability.
Co-Authors Asmarani, Abiyyah Indi Hasyim, Moch. Wachid Moch. Muwaffiqillah, Moch. Trinas Dewi Hariyana zulfa, indana