Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis Peraturan Menteri Pembangunan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat No. 1 Tahun 2017 Tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Pengadaaan Badan Usaha Untuk Pengusahaan Jalan Tol Terhadap Prinsip Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat Zunov, Farahannesa; Sukarmi; Alam, Moch. Zairul
Warkat Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Desember
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/warkat.v2n2.3

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the implementation of fair business competition in the provision of Regulation of the Minister of Public and Housing Development Number 1 of 2017 concerning the Procedures of the Procurement of Legal Entity in a Highway Toll Project (henceforth referred to as Ministerial Regulation) by analyzing the implementation of fair business competition principle in an auction service of a business entity as governed in the Ministerial Regulation and the provision of the agreement regarding the highway toll project procurement that may take up to 50 years, and this period can be extended. However, there have not been any standards of business entity in terms of how this agreement is extended and any standards that set the maximum period of the extension. That is, this research investigates whether the extension period without any strict deadline complies with the substantive aspect of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Ban on Monopolistic and Unfair Business Competition Practices.
ANALISIS PENGATURAN PENGALIHAN DATA PRIBADI LINTAS NEGARA PASCA AKUISISI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI An Nafisa, Tazkiya; Alam, Moch. Zairul; Maharani, Diah Pawestri
Jurnal Dialektika Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Dialektika Hukum
Publisher : Law Department Jenderal Achmad Yani University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36859/jdh.v7i1.3548

Abstract

In this digital era, there is a trend of international business expansion by conducting corporate actions, including acquisition, which causes the transfer of personal data both domestically and cross-border due to post-acquisition integration. Meanwhile, in Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, there are only separate provisions in Article 48 and Article 56 regarding corporate actions and cross-border transfers of personal data, without regulating the correlation between these two provisions. This could potentially lead to the automatic transfer of personal data outside Indonesian jurisdiction as a result of post-acquisition integration. This paper aims to analyse the urgency of establishing a post-acquisition cross-border personal data transfer regulation and formulate an ideal regulation to address this legal issue. The research method used is normative juridical research with a statutory, comparative, conceptual, and case approach, with legal material collection techniques by literature and website study, and analysed using systematic, grammatical, and comparative interpretations. From the results of this research, the author found that there are norm incompleteness in this law. Therefore, the Indonesian government can adopt the provisions in the European Union The General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 in formulating the ideal provisions regarding the cross-border transfer of personal data post-acquisition.
Assessing the Merger of Online Platform Companies: Does it Lead to Monopoly or just Business Expansion? (Analysis of The Merged Company of GoTo) Sukarmi, Sukarmi; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Tejomurti, Kukuh; Alam, Moch. Zairul
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v9i3.21667

Abstract

Two large digital platform companies, Gojek and Tokopedia, officially merged to form a holding company called the GoTo Group that is considered to have anti-competitive behavior and potentially data monopoly. This article aimed to analyze the adequate response to potential violations of the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition Regulation and legal issues related to consumer data monopoly issues. This article uses normative legal research with the conceptual research and statute approach. The result shows that it is necessary to define “relevant markets” and the “substituted products” to determine the existence of unfair business competition in the Gojek-Tokopedia merger. It requires analyzing the consumer behavior in other marketplaces other than Tokopedia; when consumers do not "run" to Gojek, it means they are not in the same market. To prevent privacy protection failures in post-merger data integration, companies need to assess data sharing that may be carried out as part of a risk assessment. Regarding the rights of data subjects, The company needs to provide notification to the data subject regarding the Merger and Acquisition (M & A) given the data subject's right to refuse and guarantee that the M & A process will not violate the right to privacy of the customer's dataKeywords: Competition Law; Digital Platform; Merger Menilai Penggabungan Perusahaan Platform Online: Apakah Mengakibatkan Monopoli atau Hanya Ekspansi Bisnis? (Analisis Penggabungan GoTo)AbstrakDua perusahaan platform digital besar, Gojek dan Tokopedia, resmi bergabung membentuk holding company bernama GoTo Group yang dinilai memiliki perilaku anti persaingan dan berpotensi monopoli data. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis respon yang memadai terhadap potensi pelanggaran Peraturan Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat serta masalah hukum terkait masalah monopoli data konsumen. Artikel ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan penelitian konseptual dan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perlunya mendefinisikan “pasar relevan” dan “produk substitusi” untuk mengetahui adanya persaingan usaha tidak sehat dalam merger Gojek-Tokopedia. Hal ini membutuhkan analisis perilaku konsumen di pasar lain selain Tokopedia; ketika konsumen tidak “lari” ke Gojek, berarti mereka tidak berada di pasar yang sama. Untuk mencegah kegagalan perlindungan privasi dalam integrasi data pasca-merger, perusahaan perlu menilai pembagian data yang mungkin dilakukan sebagai bagian dari penilaian risiko. Mengenai hak subjek data, Perusahaan perlu memberikan pemberitahuan kepada subjek data mengenai Merger dan Akuisisi (M&A) mengingat hak subjek data untuk menolak dan menjamin bahwa proses M&A tidak akan melanggar hak privasi data pelangganKata Kunci: Hukum Persaingan Usaha; Platform Digital; PenggabunganОценка слияний компаний онлайн-платформ: приведет ли это к монополии или просто к расширению бизнеса? (Анализ слияний GoTo (Gojek и Tokopedia)  АннотацияДве крупные компании, занимающиеся цифровыми платформами, Gojek и Tokopedia, официально объединили свои усилия, чтобы сформировать холдинговую компанию GoTo Group, которая, как считается, ведет антиконкурентную политику и может монополизировать данные. Данная статья направлена на анализ адекватного реагирования на возможные нарушения Положения о запрещении монополистической практики и недобросовестной конкуренции, а также на правовые вопросы, связанные с проблемой монополии на данные потребителей. В данной статье используется нормативно-правовое исследование с концептуальным и правовым исследовательским подходом. Результаты исследования указывают на необходимость определить «соответствующие рынки» и «продукты-заменители», чтобы определить наличие недобросовестной деловой конкуренции в слиянии Gojek-Tokopedia. Это требует анализа поведения потребителей на рынках, отличных от Tokopedia; когда потребители не «бегут» в Gojek, это означает, что они не находятся на одинаковом рынке. Чтобы предотвратить сбои в защите конфиденциальности при интеграции данных после слияния, компаниям необходимо оценить возможное совместное использование данных в рамках оценки рисков. Что касается прав субъекта данных, Компания должна уведомить субъект данных о слиянии и поглощении (M&A), учитывая право субъекта данных отказаться и гарантировать, что процесс M&A не нарушит права на конфиденциальность данных клиента.Ключевые слова: Закон о деловой конкуренции; цифровые платформы; слияние