Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sosiohumaniora Journal of International Relations Studies
Putri, Sapen Sartika Unyi
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Praktik Diskursif Amerika Serikat dalam Membangun Narasi Terorisme Global : Studi Kasus Kejahatan oleh Ali Muhammad Brown dan Stephen Craig Paddock Putri, Sapen Sartika Unyi; Rosyidin, Mohamad; Alfian, Muhammad Faizal
Journal of International Relations Volume 8, Nomor 1, Tahun 2022
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The United States of America as a super power, is able to create and build knowledge, 'reality', and global narratives that are trusted by the world community according to their interests. This is no exception in terms of terrorism. The purpose of this study is to explain how the discursive practices carried out by the US Government and media in building a global narrative related to terrorism through case studies of crimes committed by Ali Muhammad Brown and Stephen Craig Paddock. The method used in this research is a qualitative descriptive approach. This research is viewed from the perspective of poststructuralism which has not been found in previous studies. The result of this study is that the identification of who deserves the label of terrorist in the United States occurs only in Muslims and especially those who have people of color. This occurs as a result of the social construction that develops in global society through the discursive practices of the United States Government and Media. From the results of this study, it shows how discursive practice can be used in shaping existing reality and knowledge, so the discourse will contain different meanings depending on who interprets it. In addition from this research, it can be concluded that the reality and narrative as well as knowledge related to global terrorism are not free values but are biased towards political interests and are built by constructions and discursive practices developed by the ruling state.
CLIMATE JUSTICE AND SOCIAL EQUITY IN INDONESIAN WATERSHED GOVERNANCE : THE CASE OF CITARUM Putri, Sapen Sartika Unyi; Widianingsih, Ida; Dewi, Anggia Utami
Sosiohumaniora Vol 26, No 3 (2024): Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, NOVEMBER 2024
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v26i3.63610

Abstract

This study explores how climate justice and social equity are integrated into watershed governance in Indonesia, using the Citarum River as a case study. It examines the progress and challenges faced by local communities and the government, as well as the policies implemented to achieve climate justice and social equity within a sustainable governance framework. Using a case study approach and qualitative methods, the findings highlight progress through initiatives such as the Citarum Harum program, which has facilitated renewable energy transitions, ecological restoration, and the adoption of Natural Climate Solutions (NCS), including the Citarum Living Lab program. However, findings also reveal that several challenges persist, including socio-political barriers, participatory limitations (especially from marginalized communities and non-governmental actors in decision-making), fragmented policy coordination, lack of stakeholder synergy, overlapping policies leading to inefficiencies, unequal resource distribution, and the increasing frequency of natural disasters that hinder inclusive governance. This study underscores the critical importance of integrating climate justice and social equity into Citarum Watershed governance to achieve environmental sustainability and improve the quality of life for local communities. It emphasizes the need to strengthen collaborative governance models, particularly through the Quintuple Helix framework, while ensuring inclusive decision-making. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers to frame climate crises through the lens of climate justice and social equity, ensuring that sustainable watershed governance not only benefits communities in the Citarum Watershed but also contributes to broader societal well-being.
Co-Authors Alfian, Muhammad Faizal Anggia Utami Dewi Ida Widianingsih Mohamad Rosyidin