Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

THE SINKING OF FOREIGN FISHING VESSELS THAT COMMIT ILLEGAL FISHING IN INDONESIAN SEA TERRITORY IN REVIEW OF THE 2012 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Shely, Shely; Imelda Cornelis, Vieta; Marwiyah, Siti; Widodo, Ernu
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 11, No 4 (2024): NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v11i4.2024.1321-1330

Abstract

Indonesia has a vast territory, most of which consists of the sea. Indonesia's strength lies in its natural resources, particularly the abundant marine resources, especially in incredibly diverse fisheries. With the many benefits received by the Indonesian nation, it also brings issues such as limited surveillance capabilities at sea and Indonesia's strategically located territory that can provide opportunities for the exploitation of marine resources by irresponsible parties, particularly the most frequent criminal activity, which is illegal fishing by foreign parties, resulting in significant losses for the country. The problem statement encompasses two aspects for examination: firstly, whether Indonesia's act of sinking Malaysian-flagged vessels can be justified based on the 2012 Memorandum of Understanding between Indonesia and Malaysia; secondly, the legal efforts Indonesia must undertake to defend its territorial sovereignty from illegal fishing activities by foreign fishing vessels. The research method used was normative legal research, examining from the perspective of positive law. The research findings reveal discrepancies in Indonesia's actions of sinking Malaysian-flagged vessels based on the 2012 Memorandum of Understanding. Consequently, Indonesia has fulfilled its obligations as stipulated in the Fisheries Law. However, this fulfillment of obligations occurred without prior investigation into the previously agreed bilateral agreements.
THE SINKING OF FOREIGN FISHING VESSELS THAT COMMIT ILLEGAL FISHING IN INDONESIAN SEA TERRITORY IN REVIEW OF THE 2012 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Shely, Shely; Imelda Cornelis, Vieta; Marwiyah, Siti; Widodo, Ernu
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 11, No 4 (2024): NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v11i4.2024.1321-1330

Abstract

Indonesia has a vast territory, most of which consists of the sea. Indonesia's strength lies in its natural resources, particularly the abundant marine resources, especially in incredibly diverse fisheries. With the many benefits received by the Indonesian nation, it also brings issues such as limited surveillance capabilities at sea and Indonesia's strategically located territory that can provide opportunities for the exploitation of marine resources by irresponsible parties, particularly the most frequent criminal activity, which is illegal fishing by foreign parties, resulting in significant losses for the country. The problem statement encompasses two aspects for examination: firstly, whether Indonesia's act of sinking Malaysian-flagged vessels can be justified based on the 2012 Memorandum of Understanding between Indonesia and Malaysia; secondly, the legal efforts Indonesia must undertake to defend its territorial sovereignty from illegal fishing activities by foreign fishing vessels. The research method used was normative legal research, examining from the perspective of positive law. The research findings reveal discrepancies in Indonesia's actions of sinking Malaysian-flagged vessels based on the 2012 Memorandum of Understanding. Consequently, Indonesia has fulfilled its obligations as stipulated in the Fisheries Law. However, this fulfillment of obligations occurred without prior investigation into the previously agreed bilateral agreements.
Legal Protection For Consumers Using Buy Now Pay Later Applications Ingkiriwang, Frando; Astutik, Sri; Imelda Cornelis, Vieta; Soekorini, Noenik
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai Vol 10 No 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61394/jihtb.v10i2.542

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi finansial telah melahirkan berbagai inovasi layanan keuangan digital, salah satunya adalah aplikasi Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) yang memungkinkan konsumen membeli barang atau jasa dengan pembayaran tertunda. Meskipun menawarkan kemudahan, penggunaan BNPL juga berpotensi menimbulkan risiko bagi konsumen, seperti bunga tersembunyi, denda keterlambatan, dan penyalahgunaan data pribadi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk-bentuk perlindungan hukum yang tersedia bagi konsumen pengguna BNPL, serta mengevaluasi efektivitas regulasi yang mengatur layanan tersebut di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan hukum normatif dengan memanfaatkan kerangka regulasi dan kajian pustaka. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan konsumen dalam layanan BNPL belum sepenuhnya optimal karena belum adanya regulasi khusus yang mengatur skema BNPL. Namun, perlindungan sementara dapat ditemukan dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen, Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, serta regulasi dari Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dan Bank Indonesia. Konsumen dilindungi dalam hal hak atas informasi, data pribadi, dan penyelesaian sengketa. Disarankan agar pemerintah memperkuat regulasi, penyedia BNPL bersikap transparan dan akuntabel, serta konsumen lebih berhati-hati dalam menggunakan layanan.
The Legal Impact of Free Nutritious Food Programs Due to Mass Poisoning in East Java Region Reviewed from a Human Rights Perspective Ayu Raamdhani, Fitri; Imelda Cornelis, Vieta; Astutik, Sri; Handayati, Nur
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i12.52454

Abstract

This study uses a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach) and a case approach (Case Approach). The main data sources are primary legal materials (the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, regulations related to food safety) and secondary legal materials (scientific journals, proceedings, and news reports related to the MBG poisoning incident in East Java). The mass poisoning incident in the MBG program in East Java indicates a violation of the state's obligation to guarantee human rights. The state, through the program implementing apparatus, was negligent in applying the principle of due diligence. The results of the study indicate a lack of substantive norms related to minimum hygiene standards (SLHS/HACCP) and accountability in the food supply and supervision chain. The legal impacts that arise include criminal, civil, and administrative liability for catering providers and related officials who are proven negligent, as well as violations of Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution concerning the right to a prosperous life physically and mentally. Systemic reforms in the governance of the MBG program, strengthening of food safety regulations, and transparent legal accountability mechanisms are needed to restore victims' rights and prevent recurrence of incidents.