Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

Negara Hukum, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Peranan Hakimnya Arinanto, Satya
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Demokrasi Berdasarkan Konstitusi: Mungkinkah Terjelma Di Dalam Realita? Arinanto, Satya
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Human Rights, Cultural Relativism And Non-Aligned Countries Perspective Arinanto, Satya
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
The Need Of Constitutional Court In Indonesia Arinanto, Satya
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Negara Orde Baru Dan Hak-Hak Rakyat Arinanto, Satya
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Reformasl Hukum, Demokratisasl, Dan Hak-Hak Asasl Manusla Arinanto, Satya
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Hak Atas Pendldlkan Sebagai Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Implementasinya Dalam Perspektlf Propinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD) Arinanto, Satya
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Gagasan Pengadilan Pemllihan Umum Dalam Perspektlf Sejarah Hukum Penyelenggaraan Pemilu 1999 Arinanto, Satya
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract
Lived Experiences of Constraint: Digital Activism, State, Ambivalence, and Repression in Indonesian Digital Public Sphere Jaka Setiawan; Satya Arinanto; Muhamad Syauqillah
ETTISAL : Journal of Communication Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Ettisal : Journal of Communication
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/ettisal.v11i1.45

Abstract

Digital activism has become a pivotal arena for civic engagement in Indonesia’s contemporary political landscape, enabling civil society to contest power and participate in the digital public sphere. Yet escalating cyber conflicts, disinformation, and tightening state regulation of online spaces have intensified pressures on freedom of expression. This study investigates these dynamics through a critical-transformative phenomenological approach using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), drawing on in-depth interviews with digital activists who have experienced cyber harassment, legal intimidation, and platform-based repression.Findings reveal that digital activism serves as a mechanism for democratic participation and public oversight, while activists simultaneously confront an ambivalent state posture. Protective measures—such as restorative justice pathways, selected improvements in the revised Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), and government-led digital rights literacy initiatives—signal efforts to reduce over-criminalization. However, repressive practices persist through cyber patrols, risk-based surveillance, and the continued use of elastic legal provisions and Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP). This coexistence of protection and repression produces a lived reality in which activists feel both acknowledged and constrained, reflecting a governance model that manages digital dissent without fully safeguarding digital rights. The study advances prior scholarship by shifting attention from digital mobilization to activists’ lived experiences, offering an Arendtian lens on power, participation, and the contested digital public sphere. It underscores the need for balanced regulatory frameworks that protect digital rights while ensuring public security.
Reconstructing State and Corporate Responsibility within the Human Rights Framework in Indonesia’s Mining Sector Nur Kholis; Satya Arinanto; Patricia Rinwigati
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (July - Au
Publisher : Greenation Research & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i3.1095

Abstract

The development of the business and human rights regime represents a significant challenge to the classical paradigm that positions the state as the sole duty bearer in the protection of human rights. In Indonesia's mining sector, recurring social and environmental conflicts illustrate that violations of the rights to a healthy environment, health, and livelihood cannot be attributed exclusively to the state's failure to fulfill its obligations to respect, protect, and fulfill human rights. These violations are also closely linked to corporate conduct. Despite the introduction of the protect-respect-remedy framework by the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), the implementation of these principles in Indonesia remains constrained by normative and institutional limitations. These limitations include the weak binding force of the National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (Rencana Aksi Nasional Bisnis dan Hak Asasi Manusia, RAN BHAM) and the fragmentation of victim remedy mechanisms. This study seeks to reconstruct the responsibilities of the state and corporations in an integrated manner within the mining sector. Employing a normative legal approach through statutory, conceptual, comparative, and historical methods, this study identifies a structural mismatch between legal obligations and the distribution of economic power. The proposed contribution involves a model of collaborative responsibility that integrates state duties, corporate human rights due diligence, and coordinated remedy mechanisms. This integrated approach is designed to enhance human rights protection in mining governance.