Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies IJTIHAD Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Tajdida Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum In Right: Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia Unisia
Haedar Nashir
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Sekuralisme Politik dan Fundamentalisme Agama: Ketegangan Kreatif Hubunan Agama dan Politik Haedar Nashir
Unisia No 45/XXV/II/2002
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/unisia.vol25.iss45.art3

Abstract

The discourse on the secularization of politics and the fundamentalism of religion constitutes an interesting theme and includes the complex problem. The secularization of politics as a rigid form of rigid secularism or an extreme secularization isolates religion from state is not only a single phenomenon but it also relation with the trend of religion understanding. It covers response to abuse of state management, especially about the theocratic system and the institutionalization of religion in naive politic. But at the same time the secularization of politics beside causes and refuses the religion involving, and it also cannot answer demoralization of political state as whole, so it appears the fundamentalism of religion rigidly. In this respect, it needs new alternative to find a relationship model between religion and political domain that more flexible, dynamic, it is toward modifying prophetical politic.
Muhammadiyah making Indonesia's Islamic moderation based on maqāṣid sharī`ah Zuly Qodir; Haedar Nashir; Robert W. Hefner
Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan Vol 23, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : State Islamic University of Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/ijtihad.v23i1.77-92

Abstract

Muhammadiyah, as an Islamic organization together with Nahdatul Ulama, are two Islamic organizations that oversee Islamic moderation in Indonesia. The role of Muhammadiyah in developing the idea of Islamic moderation has been manifested in educational institutions, social services, almsgiving, and health institutions such as Muhammadiyah hospitals. This research used qualitative methods based on manuscripts from journal articles, books, and interviews with expert narrators as material for analyzing the themes studied. This article is based on the theory of maqāṣid sharī`ah put forward by Jasser Auda, which provides a framework for understanding Islamic law based on multidisciplinary obedience and paying attention to the main purpose of Islamic law, not to its legal consequences. The study found that Muhammadiyah, an Islamic organization, is the guardian and propagator of moderate Islam in Indonesian society. Muhammadiyah activities for all citizens have no limits to religion. However, there were considerable obstacles to spreading Islamic moderation by Muhammadiyah. These obstacles come from internal Muslims who consider that Islamic moderation promoted by Muhammadiyah can weaken the Islamic creed of Muslims. They are less familiar with applying maqāṣid sharī`ah in understanding and practicing Islamic law in Indonesia. They are textualists towards the Qur’an and hadith.
Kompleksitas Kekerasan Keagaamaan dalam Kehidupan Umat Beragama di Indonesia: Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis Nashir, Haedar
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 49 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v49i1.132

Abstract

Religion and religious organizations actually carrying the mission of salvation, peace, happiness, and life for the good of mankind. Hence a paradox if in fact religious life religious violence. The religious violence often occurs in the sacred and complex dimensions, both rooted in the aspect of religion and other dimensions of understanding of the dynamics of the life of this beragama.Studi tried to examine the roots and dimensions of the religious violence in the lives of the people of Indonesia to date, which often happens quite hard and complicated , By using a sociological perspective, this study tries mencandra complex relationships between the dimensions of understanding inherent in the system of belief (belief system) in every religion with economic interests and political and social plurality reality in people's lives beragama.Kajian dynamics of religious violence is sociologically be very important and relevant as the case often occurs repeatedly. At the same time the study is also important in order to obtain the understanding and solving solutions in religious violence in the country.
Keislaman, Kemanusiaan, Keindonesiaan, dan Budaya: Studi Perbandingan Pemikiran Ahmad Syafii Maarif, Nurcholish Madjid dan Abdurrahman Wahid Zuly Qodir; Haedar Nashir
Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 15 No. 2: December 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Studi Islam dan Peradaban, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/AIIJIS.2019.0104.226-253

Abstract

Kajian tentang kebangsaan dan keindonesiaan merupakan hal yang tidak bisa dipisahkan. Sebagai bangsa, Indonesia berada pada posisi yang sangat beragam. Sedangkan sebagai negara Indonesia, merupakan negara dengan penduduk beragam suku, agama, etnik, dan golongan. Di antara semuanya menjadi satu dalam rumpun Keindonesiaan karena mengalami nasib yang sama di bawah penjajah colonial Belanda. Pikiran Ahmad Syafii Maarif, Abdurrahman Wahid, dan Nurcholish Madjid, tiga tokoh dari organisasi Islam terbesar di Indonesia berada pada pemikiran yang secara substansial terdapat kesamaan. Ketiganya sepakat bahwa Indonesia telah pada posisi yang ideal dengan Pancasila sebagai dasar Negara bukan negara agama. Islam sebagai agama mayoritas penduduk Indonesia, tidak dijadikan sebagai dasar negara. Ahmad Syafii Maarif, Abdurrahman Wahid dan Nurcholish Madjid sepakat bahwa nilai-nilai Pancasila merupakan nilai yang tidak bertentangan dengan Islam. Negara Pancasila sebagai pilihan adalah negara yang tidak bertentangan dengan Islam. Nasionalisme dan Islam merupakan dua hal yang saling mendukung tidak bertolak belakang. Tulisan ini memberikan kesimpulan bahwa di Indonesia, dengan Pancasila sebagai dasar negara, merupakan bagian dari kosmopolitanisme-kebangsaan yang modern. Kajian dalam tulisan ini mendasarkan pada karya yang ditulis oleh Ahmad Syafii Maarif, Abdurrahman Wahid dan Nurcholish Madjid, terutama karya yang ditulis setelah tahun 2001. Tulisan ditulis dengan pendekatan interpretative atas teks yang tersaji dalam karangan dua intelektual muslim kenamaan dari Muhammadiyah, NU dan non afiliasi organisasi keislaman.
Co-Authors Achmad Nurmandi Banggu, Masni Hidayati, Mega Ismed Kelibay Jubba, Hasse Mutohharun Jinan Ridho Al-Hamdi Robert W. Hefner Zuly Qodir