Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum E-Dimas: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Khairun Law Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Jurnal Pemberdayaan: Publikasi Hasil Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Legal Reasoning KHAIRUN LAW JOURNAL Fajar: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Rifkiyati Bachri
Universitas Pancasila
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 19 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PENERAPAN ASAS CAVEAT VENDITOR TERHADAP PEMBERIAN PEMBUKTIAN BARANG RUSAK DALAM BERBELANJA ONLINE Bachri, Rifkiyati; Gudam Fadhevi, Permata Cinta
Jurnal Legal Reasoning Vol 7 No 1 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35814/jlr.v7i1.7873

Abstract

Peristiwa pemberian beban pembuktian barang rusak untuk mendapatkan ganti rugi dengan cara melakukan video unboxing ketika berbelanja online yang diberlakukan oleh pelaku usaha kepada konsumen telah menjadi hal yang lazim untuk dilakukan. Padahal nyatanya, peristiwa ini melanggar asas Caveat Venditor dan ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pada penelitian ini, terdapat satu rumusan masalah yang diangkat, yaitu bagaimana penerapan asas Caveat Venditor terhadap pemberian pembuktian barang rusak dalam berbelanja online. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum empiris. Dari hasil penelitian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerapan asas Caveat Venditor terhadap pemberian pembuktian barang rusak dalam berbelanja online belum efektif/maksimal karena faktor budaya dan faktor masyarakat sebagai faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum menurut teori Soerjono Soekanto tidak terpenuhi.
PENERAPAN ASAS CAVEAT VENDITOR TERHADAP PEMBERIAN PEMBUKTIAN BARANG RUSAK DALAM BERBELANJA ONLINE Bachri, Rifkiyati; Gudam Fadhevi, Permata Cinta
Jurnal Legal Reasoning Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35814/jlr.v7i1.7873

Abstract

Peristiwa pemberian beban pembuktian barang rusak untuk mendapatkan ganti rugi dengan cara melakukan video unboxing ketika berbelanja online yang diberlakukan oleh pelaku usaha kepada konsumen telah menjadi hal yang lazim untuk dilakukan. Padahal nyatanya, peristiwa ini melanggar asas Caveat Venditor dan ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Pada penelitian ini, terdapat satu rumusan masalah yang diangkat, yaitu bagaimana penerapan asas Caveat Venditor terhadap pemberian pembuktian barang rusak dalam berbelanja online. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum empiris. Dari hasil penelitian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerapan asas Caveat Venditor terhadap pemberian pembuktian barang rusak dalam berbelanja online belum efektif/maksimal karena faktor budaya dan faktor masyarakat sebagai faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum menurut teori Soerjono Soekanto tidak terpenuhi.
Modal Penyertaan dan Pertanggungjawaban Koperasi Panca Prima Terhadap Wanprestasi yang Dilakukan Selajar, Sophian; Bachri, Rifkiyati; N, Nabila
Khairun Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Volume 2 Issue 1, September 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v2i1.1882

Abstract

A cooperative is a business entity that requires capital. Cooperative capital consists of own capital and loan capital, but to develop its business, cooperatives can also conduct equity investment activities. This capital investment activity attracts the attention of the community because of its nature that bears the risk of loss but the investor is not given the authority to participate in managing the capital opening opportunities for misuse of capital investment management in cooperatives that can lead to defaults by cooperatives due to default on investors, as well as with investors. Panca Prima Cooperative which defaults on the venture capital cooperation agreement (investment capital). Thus, a problem arises whether the Panca Prima Cooperative can be held accountable for default on the venture capital cooperation agreement (equity participation) that is carried out and whether the management of the Panca Prima Cooperative is also responsible for the default carried out by the cooperative. To answer these problems normative research methods are used. Thus, it was concluded that the Panca Prima Cooperative could be held accountable for the default of the cooperative working agreement (capital participation) because the status of the Panca Prima Cooperative was a legal entity and that the Panca Prima Cooperative Management could not be held liable for defaults made by the cooperative Koperasi Panca Prima is a legal entity
Disparitas Pemahaman Hakim dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Kajian Putusan No. 350 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016 dan NO.10/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN.Plk) Bachri, Rifkiyati; Kurniawan, Yunan Prasetyo
Khairun Law Journal Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Volume 1 Issue 2, March 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v1i2.1881

Abstract

Judge decision NO. 350 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016 and Judge decision NO.10/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN.Plk are 2 (two) of the 127 (one hundred and twenty seven) verdicts of BPSK annulled by the Supreme Court (MA) on October 27, 2017. Where MA argued the two verdicts were not the authority of BPSK. Thus, problems arise whether the decision NO. 350 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016 and the decision NO.10/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN.Plk are the competence of BPSK in resolving consumer disputes or not. To answer these problems, normative legal research methods are used, so that the conclusion is that the verdict NO.10/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN.Plk is not the Palangkaraya BPSK competency in deciding because Sancho is not the final consumer protected by UUPK, so if the Supreme Court annulled the decision of the Palangkaraya BPSK is true. Meanwhile, verdict NO. 350 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016 is true Coal BPSK competency to decide consumer disputes because Dermasnyah Pane is the final consumer protected by UUPK, so if the Supreme Court annulled the decision of Coal BPSK is not true.
Disparitas Pemahaman Hakim dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Kajian Putusan No. 350 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016 dan NO.10/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN.Plk) Bachri, Rifkiyati; Kurniawan, Yunan Prasetyo
Khairun Law Journal Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Volume 1 Issue 2, March 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v1i2.1881

Abstract

Judge decision NO. 350 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016 and Judge decision NO.10/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN.Plk are 2 (two) of the 127 (one hundred and twenty seven) verdicts of BPSK annulled by the Supreme Court (MA) on October 27, 2017. Where MA argued the two verdicts were not the authority of BPSK. Thus, problems arise whether the decision NO. 350 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016 and the decision NO.10/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN.Plk are the competence of BPSK in resolving consumer disputes or not. To answer these problems, normative legal research methods are used, so that the conclusion is that the verdict NO.10/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN.Plk is not the Palangkaraya BPSK competency in deciding because Sancho is not the final consumer protected by UUPK, so if the Supreme Court annulled the decision of the Palangkaraya BPSK is true. Meanwhile, verdict NO. 350 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016 is true Coal BPSK competency to decide consumer disputes because Dermasnyah Pane is the final consumer protected by UUPK, so if the Supreme Court annulled the decision of Coal BPSK is not true.
Modal Penyertaan dan Pertanggungjawaban Koperasi Panca Prima Terhadap Wanprestasi yang Dilakukan Selajar, Sophian; Bachri, Rifkiyati; N, Nabila
Khairun Law Journal Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Volume 2 Issue 1, September 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v2i1.1882

Abstract

A cooperative is a business entity that requires capital. Cooperative capital consists of own capital and loan capital, but to develop its business, cooperatives can also conduct equity investment activities. This capital investment activity attracts the attention of the community because of its nature that bears the risk of loss but the investor is not given the authority to participate in managing the capital opening opportunities for misuse of capital investment management in cooperatives that can lead to defaults by cooperatives due to default on investors, as well as with investors. Panca Prima Cooperative which defaults on the venture capital cooperation agreement (investment capital). Thus, a problem arises whether the Panca Prima Cooperative can be held accountable for default on the venture capital cooperation agreement (equity participation) that is carried out and whether the management of the Panca Prima Cooperative is also responsible for the default carried out by the cooperative. To answer these problems normative research methods are used. Thus, it was concluded that the Panca Prima Cooperative could be held accountable for the default of the cooperative working agreement (capital participation) because the status of the Panca Prima Cooperative was a legal entity and that the Panca Prima Cooperative Management could not be held liable for defaults made by the cooperative Koperasi Panca Prima is a legal entity
DESA DIGITAL: PELUANG UNTUK MENGOPTIMALKAN PENYEBARLUASAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA Wijaya, Endra; Anggraeni, Ricca; Bachri, Rifkiyati
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 13, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2013.13.1.158

Abstract

Law can be one medium to achieve social welfare. As soon as the law is formed, including the one in the form of legislation, it must be disseminated. The dissemination according to Regulations Number 12 Year 2011 about the Formation of Legislation is performed by the Government in the state gazette of the Republic of Indonesia or the News of the Republic of Indonesia through the electronic or printed media so that the community will find out and understand the content and intent of the legislation. Ideally, the dissemination of legislation is performed evenly to all of the society, starting from the central level to the regions and even to the rural area. Digital village program, connected with the internet access, is a good opportunity which can be empowered to optimize the dissemination of legislation up to the rural area. Key words : promulgation of law, use of internet, digital village
Menjembatani Kesenjangan Antara Hukum dan Kebutuhan Masyarakat Terhadap Hukum di Kelurahan Jatimulya, Depok, Jawa Barat Wijaya, Endra; Bachri, Rifkiyati; Wardani, Aprilia; Padayanti, Kris
E-Dimas: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol 11, No 4 (2020): E-DIMAS
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26877/e-dimas.v11i4.3994

Abstract

Dari sisi kuantitas, peraturan perundang-undangan, sebagai salah satu wujud dari hukum, jumlahnya sudah sangat banyak. Namun secara faktual, keberadaan hukum tersebut masih dirasakan belum bisa dijangkau dan digunakan oleh sebagian masyarakat yang membutuhkan bagi persoalan yang mereka hadapi. Kajian ini membahas permasalahan kesenjangan yang terjadi di tengah-tengah masyarakat saat mereka kesulitan menjangkau dan menggunakan hukum. Kajian ini bersandar utamanya pada informasi yang diperoleh langsung dari masyarakat saat berlangsungnya kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat di Kelurahan Jatimulya, Cilodong, Depok, Jawa Barat. Informasi tersebut lalu dianalisis dengan menghubungkannya dengan konsep maupun norma yuridis yang berlaku. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa memang masih terjadi kesenjangan antara hukum dan kebutuhan hukum masyarakat. Masyarakat masih belum bisa memahami dan mengakses hukum secara mudah.
Mewujudkan Akses Terhadap Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Melalui Penyuluhan Serta Konsultasi Hukum Di Kelurahan Jatimulya, Depok Wijaya, Endra; Bachri, Rifkiyati; Apriani, Luh Rina; Rosida, Nina; Wardani, Aprilia; Padayanti, Kris
Fajar: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 20 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Center of Community Service (PPM), Institute for Research and Community Services (LP2M) UI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jf.v20i1.20326

Abstract

Some people of Jatimulya Village, Cilodong, Depok, West Java, still could not understand clearly and faced difficulty in accessing law or legal instrument. Regarding to that, university through its faculty of law could take a part to overcome such condition. The faculty of law is able to conduct a kind of community service activity, namely socialization and public legal consultation. This study is based on information collected during the socialization and public legal consultation was held by Faculty of Law Pancasila University in Jatimulya Village. This study concludes that through the socialization and public legal consultation, the synergy between society, local government, and higher education institution could be tightened and also it would help the realization of better access to justice for all. Keywords: access to justice; public legal consultation; socialization Abstrak:Sebagian warga masyarakat Kelurahan Jatimulya, Cilodong, Depok, Jawa Barat, masih kesulitan dalam memahami hukum dan mengakses hukum. Untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut, perguruan tinggi, terutama melalui fakultas hukumnya, bisa melakukan kegiatan penyuluhan dan konsultasi hukum massal bagi warga masyarakat. Hal seperti inilah yang telah dilakukan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pancasila. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kegiatan penyuluhan dan konsultasi hukum massal ternyata bisa membawa dampak yang positif bagi pihak masyarakat yang masih belum begitu paham terhadap hukum, pihak pemerintah daerah sebagai otoritas penyedia layanan publik, dan juga bagi pihak institusi perguruan tinggi, khususnya fakultas hukum. Sinergi ketiga pihak tersebut dalam mewujudkan akses hukum yang baik pun dapat dibantu melalui kegiatan penyuluhan dan konsultasi hukum massal. Kata kunci: akses terhadap hukum; konsultasi hukum massal; penyuluhan hukum
Co-Authors Annisa, Shifa Aprilia Wardani Barkah Barkah Endra Wijaya Gudam Fadhevi, Permata Cinta Jannati, Fira Nurul Kris Padayanti Kurniawan, Yunan Prasetyo Luh Rina Apriani Muhammad Ridwan N, Nabila Nabila N Oedoyo, Wibisono Padayanti, Kris Ricca Anggraeni Rosida, Nina Selajar, Sophian Sophian Selajar Wardani, Aprilia Yunan Prasetyo Kurniawan