Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : UIR LAW REVIEW

Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HaKI) Ditinjau Dari Epistimologi Yulia Nizwana; Rahdiansyah Rahdiansyah
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (9.114 KB) | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(02).4006

Abstract

Along with the times, the protection of the rights possessed by every human being needs to be regulated, including the case with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). As one of the countries that is very diverse and has a lot of potential in the field of IPR, Indonesia has also long been actively involved in both regional and international frameworks in the field of IPR. Philosophy of science is really worth studying by anyone. Philosophy of science has a role in human life. Philosophy of science is knowledge that seeks truth. Branches of philosophy include Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology. Then IPR protection will be assessed in terms of epistemology and axiology. The formulation of the problem discussed is why IPRs need to be protected, how IPR Protection is evaluated from Epistemology,. The approach method used is Normative Juridical, discussion of issues relating to the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in terms of Epistemology. The results of the discussion, the reason why Intellectual Property Rights Need to be Protected is because IPR is natural rights, Reputation Protection, Encouragement and rewards from innovation and creation, Then supported by 5 basic theories of IPR protection: Reward Theory, Recovery Theory, Incentive Theory, Risk Theory, Economic Growth Stimulus Theory. Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in terms of Epistemology. Epistemology discusses three things, namely the object of philosophy (ie thought), how to obtain philosophical knowledge and measure of truth (philosophical knowledge) how humans seek philosophical knowledge. For example why IPR needs to be protected, the most profound and fundamental answer is IPR protection is a protection against the intellectual idea of ​​someone who was born naturally the gift of the God, that is from God where every human being was created with advantages including the advantages of intellectual ideas that are certainly different every human beings, so that intellectual ideas need to be protected because they are subjective and natural.
Deliberation, Southeast Asian Local Wisdom in Resolving Disputes Rahdiansyah Rahdiansyah; Yulia Nizwana
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (9.114 KB) | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(02).4557

Abstract

Cultural disputes, and others, often occur between neighboring countries in Southeast Asia and can be the seeds of disharmony, of course, this is not desirable. Southeast Asia as a cultural scope that is interrelated in history, has local wisdom in resolving disputes, resolving this dispute is known as deliberation. Deliberation is an identity that must be prioritized as a wise cultural approach for the ASEAN community. The purpose of this study is to explore the local wisdom of Southeast Asian people in resolving disputes in their communities and implementing them as a solution for the ASEAN community. Recognizing each other as cultural origins often occur between Malaysian and Indonesian communities. As a nation of the same family, this is commonplace, but the most important thing is how to solve it. Interviewing the people of both countries is the first thing to do in looking at this problem, how they understand and see culture in their culture. Questionnaires are distributed as much as possible, each data obtained will be processed and classified according to nationality, education, age, and others. The findings will be a study to see the perspectives of the two countries in understanding history, culture, and cultural results in addressing the differences of opinion that occur. At least the description of the root of the problem is obtained, why this problem occurs, what are the main causes, how to understand it, how to react to it, and lead to the resolution of the dispute over ownership of culture itself