Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Obstruction of Justice in Corruption Cases Yuherawan, Deni Setya Bagus
JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Globalization, Law, and Crimes: The Various Aspects of Law in Broader Context
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

The purpose of this article is to analyze the investigation authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) on the counteraction case of corruption justice process. The reason for the writing is the existence of different interpretation of the authority of the KPK Investigator to conduct an investigation on the counteraction case of justice process in Article 21 of Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Law junto Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of the Corruption (the Law of Corruption Act). The analysis method of the problem formulation applies Grammatical Interpretation, Systematic Interpretation, and Teleological Interpretation. The legislation analyzed, besides the Anti-Corruption Law, is the Decree of the Peopleâ€™s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia Number XI / MPR / 1998 concerning State Administrators that are clean and free of corruption, collusion, and nepotism; also Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission junto Law Number 10 of 2015 concerning the Establishment of Government Regulations in lieu of Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. The conclusion of this article is that the KPK Investigator is not authorized to conduct an investigation on the counteraction case of corruption justice process.

The Pretrial (Praperadilan) Filed By The Suspect With The Status Wanted List Of People (DPO) Yuherawan, Deni
Veteran Law Review Vol 3, No 2 (2020): November 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/velrev.v3i2.2121

The granting of a Pre-trial petition filed by a suspect whose status is a Wanted List of People (DPO) by the panel of judges is one of the actions deemed to deviate from the rule of law. SEMA Number 1 of 2018 concerning the Prohibition of Proposal for Pretrial by Escaping Suspects or with the status of DPO has confirmed that pretrial applications may not be filed by suspects who have fled or DPO in another sense submitted by legal counsel or their families. In this case, there is a legal problem, namely the conflict of norm values in a rule. So this article is written to analyze whether pretrial filings made by suspects with the status of a Wanted List or DPO can be justified or not. This research is normative legal research that uses a statutory approach (Statute Approach) and a conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach). For this reason, the data that the authors use is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Primary legal materials consist of legal products such as statutory regulations. Meanwhile, secondary legal materials consist of journals and books that are relevant to research problems. The collected data are then compiled, Â processed, Â and analyzed using prescriptive analysis using substance comparisons so that it will answer the problems.Keywords: Pre-trial, suspect, wanted List of people

Obstruction of Justice in Corruption Cases Yuherawan, Deni Setya Bagus
JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Globalization, Law, and Crimes: The Various Aspects of Law in Broader Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v5i1.38575

The purpose of this article is to analyze the investigation authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) on the counteraction case of corruption justice process. The reason for the writing is the existence of different interpretation of the authority of the KPK Investigator to conduct an investigation on the counteraction case of justice process in Article 21 of Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Law junto Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of the Corruption (the Law of Corruption Act). The analysis method of the problem formulation applies Grammatical Interpretation, Systematic Interpretation, and Teleological Interpretation. The legislation analyzed, besides the Anti-Corruption Law, is the Decree of the Peopleâ€™s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia Number XI / MPR / 1998 concerning State Administrators that are clean and free of corruption, collusion, and nepotism; also Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission junto Law Number 10 of 2015 concerning the Establishment of Government Regulations in lieu of Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. The conclusion of this article is that the KPK Investigator is not authorized to conduct an investigation on the counteraction case of corruption justice process.

Kedudukan Hukum dan Fungsi Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor. SE/7/VII/2018 tentang Penghentian Penyelidikan Muhammad Huzaini; Deni Setya Bagus Yuherawan
Widya Yuridika Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

This article reviews the Circular of the Chief of Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number: SE / 7 / VI / 2018 concerning the termination of the investigation. The emergence of this circular provides legal certainty value for alleged criminal acts with inadequate facts and evidence so that the investigation must be stopped. On the one hand, it also degrades the value of legal certainty because it forms a new norm regarding the termination of investigations which is not regulated at all in the Criminal Procedure Code as a formal legal basis in criminal law. The author is interested in reviewing the Chief of Police circular in terms of statutory regulations and functions. This paper is theoretical research with a conceptual approach. The results of this research are the legal position of the Chief of Police Circular Number: SE / 7 / VII / 2018 concerning the Termination of Investigation is not included in the laws and regulations. The function of the Chief of Police Circular Number: SE / 7 / VII / 2018 concerning the Termination of Investigation to fill the legal vacuum regarding the mechanism for terminating the investigation which is not regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code and the function of the Chief of Police Circular Letter No: SE / 7 / VII / 2018 concerning the Termination of Investigation is as instructions and notifications regarding the mechanisms and procedures for terminating investigations to investigators of the Indonesian National Police. AbstrakArtikel ini mengulas Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor: SE / 7 / VI / 2018 tentang penghentian penyelidikan. Munculnya surat edaran ini memberikan nilai kepastian hukum atas dugaan tindak pidana dengan fakta dan bukti yang tidak memadai sehingga penyelidikan harus dihentikan. Di satu sisi juga merendahkan nilai kepastian hukum karena membentuk norma baru mengenai penghentian penyelidikan yang sama sekali tidak diatur dalam KUHAP sebagai landasan hukum formal dalam hukum pidana. Penulis tertarik untuk mengkaji surat edaran Kapolri ditinjau dari peraturan perundang-undangan dan fungsinya. Makalah ini merupakan penelitian teoritis dengan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini adalah kedudukan hukum Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor: SE / 7 / VII / 2018 tentang Penghentian Penyelidikan tidak termasuk dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Fungsi Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor: SE / 7 / VII / 2018 tentang Penghentian Penyelidikan untuk mengisi kekosongan hukum mengenai mekanisme penghentian penyelidikan yang tidak diatur dalam KUHAP dan fungsi Kepala Badan Reserse Kriminal. Surat Edaran Kepolisian No: SE / 7 / VII / 2018 tentang Penghentian Penyelidikan sebagai petunjuk dan pemberitahuan mengenai mekanisme dan prosedur penghentian penyelidikan kepada penyidik Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Makna Kepentingan Umum Pada Kewenangan Deponering Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Agustalita, Dinda Heidiyuan; Yuherawan, Deni Setya Bagus
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v4n1.p160-189

Pengesampingan perkara atau deponering merupakan kewenangan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, khususnya Jaksa Agung. Pengaturan deponering diatur dalam Pasal 35 huruf c UU Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 yang menyatakan bahwa Jaksa Agung berwenang mengesampingkan perkara demi kepentingan umum. Pasal tersebut mengartikan kepentingan umum sebagai kepentingan dari bangsa dan negara, dan/atau kepentingan dari masyarakat luas. Konsep “kepentingan umum” menimbulkan pemahaman yang evaluatif dan kabur (vage normen). Makna evaluatif membutuhan kejelasan komprehensif, sehingga harus bersifat “clear and precise” (jelas dan tepat). Ketidakjelasan makna “kepentingan umum” berimplikasi pada ketidakpastian hukum. Parameter konsep “kepentingan umum” merupakan kebutuhan mutlak untuk memudahkan operasionalisasi makna kepentingan umum. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis parameter kepentingan umum untuk operasionalisasi konsep kepentingan umum, yang pada gilirannya akan memudahkan untuk menyandingkan konsep “kepastian hukum”. Penelitian hukum doktrinal ini menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan, deponering adalah tidak dituntutnya perkara berdasarkan kepentingan umum, yaitu kepentingan bangsa dan negara yang merupakan kepentingan yang mencakup seluruh aspek dari bangsa yang terdapat dalam suatu negara. Serta, kepentingan masyarakat luas yang merupakan segala kepentingan terkait dengan tatanan kehidupan masyarakat secara menyeluruh. Apabila dalam penuntutan suatu perkara menimbulkan terganggunya stabilitas pemerintahan yang menyebabkan kerugian secara nyata bagi negara, serta menimbulkan reaksi ditengah masyarakat yang dapat mengancam keamanan masyarakat secara luas, maka penuntutan tersebut dapat ditiadakan atau dikesampingkan demi kepentingan umum. Selama ini, penafsiran makna kepentingan umum hanya didasarkan pada keyakinan Jaksa Agung saja. Oleh karena itu, perlu adanya aturan terkait konsep kepentingan umum pada kewenangan deponering, agar pemaknaan kepentingan umum dapat berorientasi pada kepastian hukum.

Implikasi Hukum Pidana dan Hak Asasi Manusia terhadap Praktik Euthanasia di Indonesia Joice Soraya; Deni Setya Bagus Yuherawan; Galih Setya Refangga
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 JULI 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

The general principle of the Criminal Code (KUHP) regarding issues of the human soul is to protect human rights to life and dignity. So, under Indonesian law, euthanasia is a legal crime. One major issue raised in the article is how the practice of euthanasia is viewed from a human rights perspective, as well as the implications of criminal law and human rights for euthanasia in Indonesia. The goal of this writing is to identify and analyse the practice of euthanasia from a human rights standpoint, as well as to explain and analyse the implications of criminal law and human rights on euthanasia in Indonesia. This study takes a normative juridical approach, specifically doctrinaire legal research that refers to legal norms. As a result, this study relies heavily on secondary sources with a legal and theoretical background. This research takes both a statutory and a conceptual approach. The research results show that, from a human rights perspective, the practice of euthanasia is in direct conflict with several articles of the 1945 Constitution that regulate human rights, namely Article 28A, Article 28G paragraph (2), and Article 28I paragraph (1), as well as Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, Article 4, Article 9 paragraph (1), and Article 33 paragraph (2). Euthanasia is a crime against people's lives that is regulated under criminal law.

Perubahan Sistem dan Praktik Hukum Pidana Indonesia Sebagai Akibat Berlakunya KUHP Baru Sulistyani Eka Lestari; Fanny Tanuwijaya; Ferdricka Nggeboe; Asmak ul Hosnah; Deni Setya Bagus Yuherawan; Joice Soraya
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 JULI 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

With the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (New Criminal Code), there will be legal implications for several important aspects, namely the source of criminal law, the criminal justice system, and the practice of criminal law. This article aims to analyze predictions of implementing these 3 (three) aspects related to the provisions of Article 1 paragraph (1) and Article 2 of the New Criminal Code. In principle, Article 1 paragraph (1) of the New Criminal Code regulates the Principle of Legality, and Article 2 of the New Criminal Code regulates the existence and application of laws in society. The legal issue in this article is the potential difficulty of implementing 'living law'. It is necessary to substantially analyze several substantial things about the existence of the criminal law system and the criminal justice system that was formed with the enactment of Article 2 paragraph (1) of the New Criminal Code, as well as the potential juridical obstacles that exist in legal practice, with the existence of the newly formed criminal law system. This article uses legal research methods and doctrinal research types. This research uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Analysis of legal materials uses prescriptive analysis with authentic and systematic interpretation. The analysis is intended to develop legal arguments regarding the juridical obstacles to enforcing 'laws that live in society.

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA PERBANKAN PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERBANKAN Baidi, Ribut; Yuherawan, Deni Setya Bagus
Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) Vol 3, No 01 (2023): January
Publisher : Univeristas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jj.v3i1.2112

ABSTRAK Aktifitas bisnis dan pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia mayoritas bergantung kepada sektor perbankan sebagai mitra permodalan melalui kredit maupun bentuk pinjaman lainnya. Namun, seiring perjalanan waktu, banyak terjadi penyimpangan yang mengarah kepada kejahatan perbankan,Â seperti kredif fiktif yang melibatkan nasabah/konsumen dan petugas perbankan,Â bocornya dokumen yang menyangkut kerahasiaan perbankan, dan kejahatan yang berkaitan dengan perijinan operasional perbankan. Artikel ini membahas tentang pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana perbankan perspektif hukum pidana dan undang-undang perbankan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan menggunakan analisis deskriptif. Kesimpulannya, tindak pidana perbankan ada dua kategori, yakni kejahatan dan pelanggaran. Tindak pidana kejahatan perbankan disebutkan di dalam Pasal 47 sampai dengan Pasal 50A Undang-undang Perbankan, dengan sanksi pidana penjara dan denda. Sedangkan, Pasal 48 ayat (2) UU Perbankan merupakan kategori tindak pidana pelanggaran yang mendapatkan sanksi pidana kurungan. Tindak pidana perbankan adalah tindak pidana khusus perbankan, tapi unsurnya sama seperti tindak pidana umum, yakni adanya actus reus dan mens rea. Penerapan sanksi pidana bisa diterapkan kepada bank maupun kepada pegawainya sesuai kejahatan yang dilakukan, serta rumusan deliknya bisa diterapkan secara kelembagaan maupun secara pribadiABSTRACTThe majority of business activities and economic growth in Indonesia depend on the banking sector as a partner for capital through credit and other forms of loans. However, over time, many irregularities led to banking officers, leaks of documents concerning banking secrecy, and crimes related to licencing banking operations. The article discusses the liability of banking crimes from the perspective of criminal law and banking law. This research is a juridical-normative research using descriptive analysis. In conclusion, there are two categories of banking crimes, namely crimes and violations. Banking crimes are mentioned in Articles 47 to 50A of the Banking Law, with imprisonment and fines. Meanwhile, Article 48 paragraph (2) of the Banking Law is a category of criminal offense that is subject to imprisonment. A banking crime is a crime, but the elements are the same as a general crime, namely the actus reus and mens rea. The aplication of criminal sanctions can be applied to the bank and its employees according to the crime committed. They can use the formulation of the offense institutionally or personally.Â

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEREMPUAN KORBAN KEKERASAN RUMAH TANGGA Zana Marina Ivana; Rizki Zulkarnaen; Deni Setya Bagus Yuherawan
Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025): JURNAL MEDIA AKADEMIK Edisi Juni
Publisher : PT. Media Akademik Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62281/v3i6.2320

Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) merupakan pelanggaran terhadap hak asasi manusia yang banyak dialami oleh perempuan. Perempuan sebagai korban sering kali mengalami hambatan dalam memperoleh keadilan hukum, baik karena faktor budaya, ketimpangan relasi kuasa, maupun kurang optimalnya peran aparat penegak hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran aparat penegak hukum dalam menangani kasus KDRT dan menilai efektivitas perlindungan hukum terhadap perempuan korban KDRT. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta studi lapangan melalui wawancara dengan aparat dan korban. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat instrumen hukum seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan KDRT, implementasinya di lapangan belum sepenuhnya berjalan efektif. Masih ditemukan praktik diskriminatif, minimnya respons cepat, serta keterbatasan pemahaman aparat terhadap pendekatan berbasis korban. Penelitian ini juga menekankan pentingnya pendekatan multidisipliner dan perspektif gender dalam merancang kebijakan perlindungan yang menyeluruh bagi korban

Title

Found 9 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 9 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 9 Documents
Search