Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal WIDYATAMA Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik Forum Geografi Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi Lingkungan Jurnal Pendidikan dan Perhotelan
M Baiquni
Gadjah Mada University
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : forum geografi

 1 
Karakteristik Geografi Regional Indonesia: Analisis Peluang dan Tantangan terhadap Penggalian Sumber-Sumber Dasar Kawasan Indonesia Timur Baiquni, M
Forum Geografi Vol 11, No 1 (1997)
Publisher : Forum Geografi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pada dasarnya pengembangan kawasan andalan yang diprioritaskan di Kawasan Timur Indonesia (KTI) bertumpu pada pendekatan yang berorientasi pada sumberdaya (resources based oriented) dan pendekatan yang berorientasi pada sumberdaya manusia (people centered approach). Karakteristik geografi regional kepulauan Indonesia ditandai dengan dominasi wilayah laut dan perairan pantai. Luas wilayah laut sekitar empat kali lipat dari luas daratan, yaitu 7,9 juta km2 dibanding 1,9 juta km2. Ini berarti wilayah laut mendominasi sekitar 81% dari luas wilayah Indonesia, dengan garis pantai sepanjang 81.000 km. Kepulauan Indonesia dapat dibagi menjadi tiga kelompok. Kelompok pertama adalah Jawa, Sumatra, dan Kalimantan serta pulau-pulau kecil di sekitar dangkalan Sunda di sekitar perairan Selat Malaka dan perairan Indo – Cina yang berasosiasi dengan Asia. Kelompok kedua adalah Irian Jaya (bagian dari Pulau New Guinea) dan kepulauan Aru di dangkalan Sahul yang berasosiasi dengan Australia. Kelompok ketiga adalah kelompok kepulauan Nusa Tenggara, Maluku, dan Sulawesi dengan dikelilingi perairan dalam atau palung laut. Sumber-sumber dasar pembangunan yang dimaksud dalam penelitian ini dapat dikelompokkan menjadi tiga, yaitu sumberdaya alam, manusia, dan budaya. Pengembangan KTI perlu mendapat perhatian karena masih adanya kesenjangan pembangunan yang terjadi. Kesenjangan ini dapat dilihat dari tiga indikator dasar yaitu luas geografis, distribusi kependudukan, dan konsentrasi industri Pulau Jawa dan Madura.
Eco-Geography of Coastal Areas: Sosio-Economy Dynamic of Land Ownership of Coastal Areas of Indonesia Baiquni, M
Forum Geografi Vol 11, No 2 (1997)
Publisher : Forum Geografi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia constitute an archipelagic state which passesses resource of ocean, ecosystem of coast area and social economy dynamics of various maritime society. The nation of Indonesia had ever been welknown as a maritime nation which dominated Nusantara territorial waters as far as neighbour state. Fish cultivation in embankruent  system has been being known since the era of Mojopahit Kingdom and likewise boat industry was held along the north-oast of Java which was ever glorius in the beginning of Dutch Colonialism. But, up to now why a large part of Indonesian fishermen are still using simple technology and method in fishery and fish cultivation? Change in policy within Dutch era development. Which was farm land oriented and plantation had influenced the maritime tradition slip off. Opening of railway and land tract transportation in Java had changed economic ativity pattern of the oast area to hinterland. Investment and human resource were councentrated to farmland development and plantation was directed to export so that it affected the coast area slip off which was basically fishery activity. Development after independence, mainly in the era of New Order, it started from farming activity raised to industry society. Coastal area came back to develop with industrial growth in the urbans of Java north coast. Nevertheless development in fishery does not yet return to show the sign of glorious untill the end of this age. It is  hoped that, with properly judment of the islands coastal area out of Java, goverment will direct  its policy and investment to develop the new maritime society to go against the glorious in the 21st century.
Rural Depopulation Pattern at Yogyakarta Special Province (DIY) Baiquni, M; Muta’ali, Luthfi
Forum Geografi Vol 12, No 1 (1998)
Publisher : Forum Geografi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Rural population in Yogyakarta Special Province (DIY), in the last two decades, have shown dramatical changes in its quantity and quality. Depopulation is one of the interseting hanges which may considered as unique in term of its spatial distribution. Rural depopulation is a nebulous phenomenon which many factors, actors, and other  phenomenon are involved in shoping depopulation. It is related to socio – economic hanges such as a) shifting economic structure and labour in rural areas from agricultural to non – agriculture sectors; b) growing urban economy leads by industry which may creates employment opportunities and adsorb labours or migrants; c) improving social development related to technological innovation, accessibility and resource availability. Besides the sicio – economic factors, physical geographycal factors may influence to depopulation pattern.This paper is based on a secondary data research i.e. statistical data at rural levels in Yogyakarta, thematics maps and other documents. Statistical methodes and map pattern analysis are employed to analysis data. The result of this research are as follows: a) the rural depopulation in DIY can be found in 189 rural areas of 393 rural areas (48.09%); b) the spatial distribution of the rural depopulation are in Gunung Kidul District (80 rural areas), Kulon Progo District (59 rural areas) Sleman District (33 rural areas), and Bantul District (17 rural areas); c) the rural depopulation in Yogyakarta at least related to six factors whih have been identified as out – migration, local resources, carrying capacity, geographycal location or accessibility, rural infrastructure, and service availability.
Karakteristik Geografi Regional Indonesia: Analisis Peluang dan Tantangan terhadap Penggalian Sumber-Sumber Dasar Kawasan Indonesia Timur Baiquni, M
Forum Geografi Vol 11, No 1 (1997)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/forgeo.v11i1.500

Abstract

Pada dasarnya pengembangan kawasan andalan yang diprioritaskan di Kawasan Timur Indonesia (KTI) bertumpu pada pendekatan yang berorientasi pada sumberdaya (resources based oriented) dan pendekatan yang berorientasi pada sumberdaya manusia (people centered approach). Karakteristik geografi regional kepulauan Indonesia ditandai dengan dominasi wilayah laut dan perairan pantai. Luas wilayah laut sekitar empat kali lipat dari luas daratan, yaitu 7,9 juta km2 dibanding 1,9 juta km2. Ini berarti wilayah laut mendominasi sekitar 81% dari luas wilayah Indonesia, dengan garis pantai sepanjang 81.000 km. Kepulauan Indonesia dapat dibagi menjadi tiga kelompok. Kelompok pertama adalah Jawa, Sumatra, dan Kalimantan serta pulau-pulau kecil di sekitar dangkalan Sunda di sekitar perairan Selat Malaka dan perairan Indo – Cina yang berasosiasi dengan Asia. Kelompok kedua adalah Irian Jaya (bagian dari Pulau New Guinea) dan kepulauan Aru di dangkalan Sahul yang berasosiasi dengan Australia. Kelompok ketiga adalah kelompok kepulauan Nusa Tenggara, Maluku, dan Sulawesi dengan dikelilingi perairan dalam atau palung laut. Sumber-sumber dasar pembangunan yang dimaksud dalam penelitian ini dapat dikelompokkan menjadi tiga, yaitu sumberdaya alam, manusia, dan budaya. Pengembangan KTI perlu mendapat perhatian karena masih adanya kesenjangan pembangunan yang terjadi. Kesenjangan ini dapat dilihat dari tiga indikator dasar yaitu luas geografis, distribusi kependudukan, dan konsentrasi industri Pulau Jawa dan Madura.
Eco-Geography of Coastal Areas: Sosio-Economy Dynamic of Land Ownership of Coastal Areas of Indonesia Baiquni, M
Forum Geografi Vol 11, No 2 (1997)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/forgeo.v11i2.487

Abstract

Indonesia constitute an archipelagic state which passesses resource of ocean, ecosystem of coast area and social economy dynamics of various maritime society. The nation of Indonesia had ever been welknown as a maritime nation which dominated Nusantara territorial waters as far as neighbour state. Fish cultivation in embankruent  system has been being known since the era of Mojopahit Kingdom and likewise boat industry was held along the north-oast of Java which was ever glorius in the beginning of Dutch Colonialism. But, up to now why a large part of Indonesian fishermen are still using simple technology and method in fishery and fish cultivation? Change in policy within Dutch era development. Which was farm land oriented and plantation had influenced the maritime tradition slip off. Opening of railway and land tract transportation in Java had changed economic ativity pattern of the oast area to hinterland. Investment and human resource were councentrated to farmland development and plantation was directed to export so that it affected the coast area slip off which was basically fishery activity. Development after independence, mainly in the era of New Order, it started from farming activity raised to industry society. Coastal area came back to develop with industrial growth in the urbans of Java north coast. Nevertheless development in fishery does not yet return to show the sign of glorious untill the end of this age. It is  hoped that, with properly judment of the islands coastal area out of Java, goverment will direct  its policy and investment to develop the new maritime society to go against the glorious in the 21st century.
Rural Depopulation Pattern at Yogyakarta Special Province (DIY) Baiquni, M; Muta’ali, Luthfi
Forum Geografi Vol 12, No 1 (1998)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/forgeo.v12i1.478

Abstract

Rural population in Yogyakarta Special Province (DIY), in the last two decades, have shown dramatical changes in its quantity and quality. Depopulation is one of the interseting hanges which may considered as unique in term of its spatial distribution. Rural depopulation is a nebulous phenomenon which many factors, actors, and other  phenomenon are involved in shoping depopulation. It is related to socio – economic hanges such as a) shifting economic structure and labour in rural areas from agricultural to non – agriculture sectors; b) growing urban economy leads by industry which may creates employment opportunities and adsorb labours or migrants; c) improving social development related to technological innovation, accessibility and resource availability. Besides the sicio – economic factors, physical geographycal factors may influence to depopulation pattern.This paper is based on a secondary data research i.e. statistical data at rural levels in Yogyakarta, thematics maps and other documents. Statistical methodes and map pattern analysis are employed to analysis data. The result of this research are as follows: a) the rural depopulation in DIY can be found in 189 rural areas of 393 rural areas (48.09%); b) the spatial distribution of the rural depopulation are in Gunung Kidul District (80 rural areas), Kulon Progo District (59 rural areas) Sleman District (33 rural areas), and Bantul District (17 rural areas); c) the rural depopulation in Yogyakarta at least related to six factors whih have been identified as out – migration, local resources, carrying capacity, geographycal location or accessibility, rural infrastructure, and service availability.
Co-Authors Anondho Wijanarko Bambang Prasetya Chafid Fandeli Heri Hermansyah I Ibrahim, I Janianton Damanik Luthfi Muta’ali M Samsuri, M Misri Gozan Mohammad Nasikin R Mardias, R S Ritohardoyo, S S Setiadi, S Wiyono, Djoko Yoto Widodo Yuliyanto, Adhi