Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bestuur Jurnal Akta AS-SIYASI JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah
Rudy Iskandar Ichlas
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Indonesia
Aerospace Engineering Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Analysis on Status as A Co-Defendant Notary in Dispute of Gather Treasure (Case Study in The Court of Ungaran District No: 105 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Unr) Rudy Iskandar Ichlas; Akhmad Khisni
Jurnal Akta Vol 6, No 2 (2019): June 2019
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v6i2.5035

Abstract

Authentic Deed is not solely determined by the law but must also be made before a public official even though the parties have signed. Pernasalahan formulation of this research: 1. How plaintiff legal reasons related to the notary as a co-defendant in the decision number 105 / Rev. G / 2016 / PN. Unr ?, 2. What legal consequences for the Notary as a co-defendant in the decision number 105 / Rev. G / 2016 / PN. Unr. In conclusion: 1). Position Anief Ratnawati, SH, Notary / PPAT in Ungaran as Co-Defendant extremely detrimental due to the lack of legal certainty as Co-Defendant and One goal (error in persona). Hence proved their obscuur libel and Error In Persona judge shall include in its decision to declare the judgment can not receive (NO: Niet ontvankelijk verklaard) lawsuit plaintiffs, 2). Anief Ratnawati, SH. as a Notary Public who is drawn into the dispute be imprecise Co-Defendant not authorized in terms of time (Onbevoegdheid ratione Temporis) and violates the principle of legality and the principles of civil law as private law. On the other hand the plaintiff proved to be an inheritance dispute within the competence of religious courtsKeywords: Legal Analysis; Notary; Co-defendant; Dispute; Gather Treasure.
Questioning the Independence of Media Coverage in the 2019 Elections Rudy Iskandar Ichlas
BESTUUR Vol 8, No 1 (2020): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (192.45 KB)

Abstract

 This research is motivated by the Television as a news media easily and quickly disseminates information. The formulation of the problem in this study is how to implement the independence of television media coverage of the 2019 Presidential Election? The theory used contains the theory of distributive justice Aristotle (Grand Theory), Election theory (Middle Theory) and Agenda Setting theory Communication (Applied Theory). The research method is empirical normative method with inductive qualitative analysis. The results of this study are the implementation of an independent television media coverage of the 2019 Presidential Election for the 2019 Presidential Election television media proving the existence of a conflicting principle of impartiality. This is not in line with Article 5 letter i of Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting transferred to broadcasting intended to provide balanced information. News which is a product of broadcasting programs in the form of journalistic work becomes a Press dispute is the authority of the Press Council. Juridical coverage of media coverage which is not independent by juridical also opposes because it is not in line with Article 6 letter d of Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning supervising, supervising, correcting, and advising on matters relating to general issues, not the owners of television media the partisan.Keywords: Independence; Television; Elections.
Constitutional Challenges of Digital Bureaucracy: Efficiency and Sovereignty in the Disruption Era Amusroh, Mohammad Rizal; Ichlas, Rudy Iskandar; Jufri, Nur Nashriany
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v52.28141

Abstract

The digital transformation of bureaucracy has become a strategic agenda for efficient, transparent, and accountable governance. In Indonesia, this transformation was institutionalized through Presidential Regulation No. 95 of 2018 on the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE). However, digital governance should not be seen merely as a technocratic project. From a constitutional law perspective, digitalization must adhere to the principles of the rule of law, human rights protection, and national sovereignty. This transformation also promotes innovation and strengthens public participation in monitoring and criticizing government policies, thus enhancing democracy. This article critically examines the implementation of digital bureaucracy within the constitutional law framework. The analysis focuses on whether digitalization improves government efficiency or creates challenges related to digital sovereignty, legal accountability, and equal access. Using normative legal research methods, the study analyzes primary sources, such as legislation, alongside secondary sources, including legal doctrine and academic works on constitutional law and digital governance. The findings show that digital bureaucracy can significantly improve public service quality. However, without a strong legal and constitutional framework, digitalization risks being merely an efficiency myth. Indonesia’s reliance on foreign digital infrastructure threatens digital sovereignty and may undermine constitutional guarantees. Therefore, the development of digital bureaucracy should be seen not only as administrative modernization but also as a constitutional mandate, balancing efficiency with constitutional principles, ensuring inclusivity, equal access, and strengthening digital sovereignty through a robust legal foundation and effective oversight
Kepastian Hukum Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah di Atas Laut Anggraini, Nita; Ichlas, Rudy Iskandar; Asnani, Multi Sri
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Desember 2025
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v4i12.5203

Abstract

This study examines the regulatory challenges arising from the utilization of marine space for the construction of permanent buildings and their implications for the exercise of state authority in Indonesia. The problem emerges from a normative dualism between agrarian law and maritime law. The Basic Agrarian Law confines the regime of land rights and state control to terrestrial areas, while maritime regulations merely regulate the administrative licensing of marine space utilization without recognizing permanent legal rights. This regulatory gap creates legal uncertainty and constrains government institutions from acting consistently with the principle of legality, particularly in determining the legal status of permanent structures built over water, such as the Al-Alam Mosque in Kendari. The research aims to analyze the impact of this normative vacuum on governmental authority in providing legal certainty and to assess the juridical consequences resulting from the absence of a clear legal basis governing permanent buildings in marine areas. A normative juridical method is employed, using statutory analysis and conceptual approaches to examine regulatory hierarchy, coherence between legal regimes, and the scope of administrative authority in managing marine space. The findings reveal that the absence of explicit norms regulating the legal status of marine space for permanent structures prevents government bodies from issuing legally sustainable decisions that ensure long-term protection. The study contributes to legal discourse by clarifying structural weaknesses within the existing regulatory framework and provides practical insights for policymakers by emphasizing the urgency of establishing integrated legal instruments to ensure legal certainty, and institutional coherence.
Co-Authors Akhmad Khisni Amusroh, Mohammad Rizal jufri, nur nashriany Multi Sri Asnani Nita Anggraini, Nita