Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN DAERAH KOTA KENDARI NOMOR 14 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PELAYANAN TERPADU BERBASIS GENDER TERHADAP PEMENUHAN HAK-HAK PEREMPUAN KORBAN KDRT Multi Sri Asnani; Irwansyah Irwansyah
At-Tanwir Law Review Vol 1, No 1 (2021): Februari 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universtitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (358.113 KB)

Abstract

Pemerintah Daerah Kota Kendari mewujudkan penyelenggaraan pelayanan terpadu bagi korban kekerasan dengan menerbitkan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 14 Tahun 2007 tentang Pelayanan Terpadu Berbasis Gender terhadap Korban Kekerasan.Pemenuhan hak diberbagai instansi yang disebutkan dalam Peraturan Daerah Nomor 14 Tahun 2007 tentang Pelayanan Terpadu Berbasis Gender terhadap Korban Kekerasan. Hal yang menarik kemudian adalah bagaimana mengukur proses implementasi Perda tersebut sedang terhadap tingkat pemahamannya masih dirasa sangat kurang ditiap instansi. Dari tingkat pemahaman tersebut tentunya melandasi bagaimana fungsi kordinasi yang ada. Masalah yang justru muncul adalah tingkat pemahaman terhadap adanya Peraturan Daerah Nomor 14 Tahun 2007 tentang Pelayanan Terpadu Berbasis Gender terhadap Korban Kekerasan ini. Dalam konteks pemberlakuannya ternyata masih banyak Instansi yang tidak mengetahui perihal kordinasi dan pemenuhan hak yang ada. Terlebih dari sisi pembebanan anggaran melalui Anggaran Pendapatan Belanja Daerah (APBD). Justru yang banyak ditemukan adalah bahwa pemenuhan hak– hak korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) berjalan sebagaimana mestinya instansi tersebut Yang bertanggungjawab atas pencapaian standar dan tujuan kebijakan, karena itu standar dan tujuan harus dikomunikasikan kepada para pelaksana. Komunikasi dalam kerangka penyampaian informasi kepada para pelaksana kebijakan tentang apa menjadi standar dan tujuan harus konsisten dan seragam (consistency and uniformity) dari berbagai sumber informasi.
Telaah Yuridis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 92/PUU-XXII/2024 dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Desa Muh. Fadil; Ahmad Rustan; Multi Sri Asnani
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 8 (2025): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i8.1703

Abstract

The simultaneous election of Village Heads (Pilkades) in South Konawe Regency on September 24, 2023 is crucial after the issuance of Law Number 3 of 2024. Although the Constitutional Court in Decision Number 92/PUU-XXII/2024 stated that the Regional Elections were in accordance with Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, the facts are contrary to Article 32 paragraph 1 of the Village Law regarding the notification of the end of the term of office of the village head. This research aims to analyze the Constitutional Court's considerations in case 92/PUU-XXII/2024 from the perspective of justice and the principle of the rule of law. This research employs a normative legal method, utilizing both a statutory approach and a case approach, with a focus on examining Article 118, letter e of Law Number 3 of 2024. The Constitutional Court judge's consideration that the Regional Elections in South Konawe were by the Village Law factually contradicted Article 32 paragraph 1 of Law Number 6 of 2014. A total of 94 village heads still have 7 months remaining in office and 2 other village heads 14 months when the election is held, even though the notice of term of office should have been made 6 months in advance. This makes the Constitutional Court's consideration juridically flawed and contrary to the principle of the rule of law, so that the applicant's application should be rejected.
Kepastian Hukum Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah di Atas Laut Anggraini, Nita; Ichlas, Rudy Iskandar; Asnani, Multi Sri
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Desember 2025
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v4i12.5203

Abstract

This study examines the regulatory challenges arising from the utilization of marine space for the construction of permanent buildings and their implications for the exercise of state authority in Indonesia. The problem emerges from a normative dualism between agrarian law and maritime law. The Basic Agrarian Law confines the regime of land rights and state control to terrestrial areas, while maritime regulations merely regulate the administrative licensing of marine space utilization without recognizing permanent legal rights. This regulatory gap creates legal uncertainty and constrains government institutions from acting consistently with the principle of legality, particularly in determining the legal status of permanent structures built over water, such as the Al-Alam Mosque in Kendari. The research aims to analyze the impact of this normative vacuum on governmental authority in providing legal certainty and to assess the juridical consequences resulting from the absence of a clear legal basis governing permanent buildings in marine areas. A normative juridical method is employed, using statutory analysis and conceptual approaches to examine regulatory hierarchy, coherence between legal regimes, and the scope of administrative authority in managing marine space. The findings reveal that the absence of explicit norms regulating the legal status of marine space for permanent structures prevents government bodies from issuing legally sustainable decisions that ensure long-term protection. The study contributes to legal discourse by clarifying structural weaknesses within the existing regulatory framework and provides practical insights for policymakers by emphasizing the urgency of establishing integrated legal instruments to ensure legal certainty, and institutional coherence.
Judicial Law-Making and the Limits of Constitutional Adjudication: Reassessing Judicial Power in Indonesia after Decision No. 92/PUU-XXII/2024 Wahyuni, Winda; Sri Asnani , Multi; Dirawati
Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam Vol.11 No.1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam IAIN Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/ajmpi.v11i1.11331

Abstract

This article examines the implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 92/PUU-XXII/2024 for the limits of judicial authority and Indonesia’s constitutional design. The decision not only reviews the constitutionality of Article 118(e) of the Village Law but also formulates an operational norm through conditional interpretation, signaling a functional shift of the Court from its classical role as a negative legislator toward judicial law-making. Employing a doctrinal legal approach with conceptual analysis and limited comparison, the study analyzes the decision, relevant legislation, and constitutional theory literature using qualitative content analysis within the theoretical frameworks of Hans Kelsen, Alec Stone Sweet, Ran Hirschl, and Mark Tushnet. The findings demonstrate that the Court’s normative intervention operates as a corrective mechanism to address legal uncertainty and to protect constitutional rights, while simultaneously generating structural tensions with the principles of separation of powers and democratic accountability. The article argues that the normalization of the Court’s role as a positive legislator risks incrementally altering the institutional balance without sufficient democratic legitimacy. The study’s main contribution lies in integrating national doctrinal analysis with global constitutional debates on the limits of judicial law-making in constitutional democracies, particularly in developing countries with unstable legislative dynamics.