Articles
<![CDATA[Perjanjian Waralaba yang Belum Terdaftar: Batal Demi Hukum atau Dapat Dibatalkan? ]]>
<![CDATA[Rahma Widiastuti, Ambria]]>;
<![CDATA[Akhmad Budi Cahyono]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2307
<![CDATA[Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 concerning Franchising (PP 42/2007), requires that the Franchisor must register the Franchise prospectus which is followed up with the registration of the Franchise Agreement by the Franchisee. Failure to register the Franchise Agreement results in the agreement being null and void because the Franchise Agreement is included in the form of a Formal Agreement. Void and void means returning the parties to their original state when the agreement had not yet been formed. However, if the Franchisee suffers a loss, he can sue the Franchisor for compensation on the basis of an Unlawful Act. The Franchisee will not experience such losses if the Franchisor registers its franchise prospectus. This study uses a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach.]]>
<![CDATA[Penyelesaian Status Tanah Hak Milik yang Berada dalam Kawasan Hutan Produksi yang Dapat Dikonversi (HPK) di Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu Provinsi Riau ]]>
<![CDATA[Almas Fadhil Ramadan]]>;
<![CDATA[Akhmad Budi Cahyono]]>
<![CDATA[ As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.47467/as.v7i1.6086
<![CDATA[This study aims to discuss the status of Freehold land located in the convertible production forest area (HPK) in Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau Province. In Riau Province, there was a determination of forest areas which resulted in Freehold land being included in the forest area. This caused Freehold land to be unable to be guaranteed and transferred. This caused losses for the Community and also for the parties who were affected by this problem. This research is a normative legal research. The results of this study are that the status of Freehold land of the Inhu Regency Community which is included in the forest area remains as Freehold land because no one has revoked its Ownership Rights. The Certificate of Ownership for land owned by the Community remains proof of legal and strong land ownership. The Inhu Regency Community cannot utilize their lands as the nature of Freehold land as a hereditary, strongest and most complete right. The material rights attached to the Freehold land have not been fulfilled. This shows the absence of certainty and legal protection for Freehold land holders in Indragiri Hulu Regency. Settlement of the status of Inhu Regency Community Land Rights that are included in the forest area, namely by removing the Land Rights from the forest area.]]>
<![CDATA[Legalitas Perjanjian Jual Beli dengan Hak Membeli Kembali pada Tanah dan/atau Bangunan (Studi Putusan-Putusan Pengadilan) ]]>
<![CDATA[Maurizkha, Vanessa]]>;
<![CDATA[Budi Cahyono, Akhmad]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 8 No 4 (2025): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Januari 2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/2nsj3r37
<![CDATA[Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung No. 3597/K/Pdt/1985 menjelaskan bahwa jual beli dengan hak membeli kembali merupakan bentuk perjanjian menurut Pasal 1519 BW dan seterusnya, sedangkan jual beli tanah/rumah sesuai dengan UUPA dikuasai oleh hukum adat yang tidak mengenal bentuk jual beli dengan hak membeli kembali. Namun, pada praktiknya masih terjadi jual beli dengan hak membeli kembali pada tanah dan/atau bangunan sebagaimana dalam Putusan Peninjauan Kembali No. 958 PK/Pdt/2020 dan Putusan Peninjauan Kembali No. 1004 PK/PDT/2020. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, maka penelitian ini membahas mengenai legalitas jual beli dengan hak membeli kembali pada tanah dan/atau bangunan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah doktrinal dengan jenis sumber hukum antara lain bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa belum terdapat kepastian hukum terkait legalitas perjanjian jual beli dengan hak membeli kembali pada tanah dan/atau bangunan karena hakim tidak mempunyai satu pandangan yang utuh tentang hal ini. Terdapat hakim yang membolehkan perjanjian jual beli dengan hak membeli kembali dengan dasar bahwa semua perjanjian yang dibuat secara sah berlaku sebagai undang-undang bagi mereka yang membuatnya sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1338 KUHPerdata. Sementara itu, terdapat pula hakim yang tidak membolehkan perjanjian jual beli dengan hak membeli kembali dengan dasar perjanjian tersebut merupakan perjanjian utang piutang yang terselubung (semu) dan tidak sesuai dengan hukum adat yang tidak mengenal jual beli dengan hak untuk membeli kembali sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung No. 1729 K/Pdt/2004.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Protection for Heirs with Non-Fungible Token Heritage Objects ]]>
<![CDATA[Erika Nur Syarifah Daulay]]>;
<![CDATA[Akhmad Budi Cahyono]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Research ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1198
<![CDATA[The development of digital technology has introduced Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT) as a form of digital asset that has its own economic value and uniqueness. This opens up the potential for NFTs as objects of inheritance, however the traditional inheritance law system in Indonesia has not fully accommodated non-physical entities such as NFTs, especially due to unclear regulations regarding the transfer of rights to these assets after the death of the owner. This article discusses legal protection for heirs with NFT inheritance objects. This research uses normative or doctrinaire research methods using secondary data and a comparative legal approach, which involves analysis of relevant laws and regulations and NFT practices in several jurisdictions that have recognized the existence of NFTs. Based on the research results, NFTs can be inherited through a general will made by a notary, olographic, or private. However, the main challenge is access to digital wallets that store NFTs and are at risk of being lost if there is not sufficient technical information regarding access. To overcome this, inheritance planning with a dead's man switch mechanism in smart contracts can enable the automatic transfer of NFTs to heirs. However, legal recognition of this mechanism is still limited. This research highlights the need for clearer regulations and legal updates in Indonesia regarding digital asset inheritance, to provide legal certainty for owners and heirs as technology develops. It is hoped that the results of this research can contribute to the formulation of clearer regulations and provide adequate legal protection for heirs and heirs who own digital assets in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Perkawinan Yang Berlaku Surut ]]>
<![CDATA[Risma, Siti]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyono, Akhmad Budi]]>
<![CDATA[ Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2025): April ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Batanghari Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i1.1732
<![CDATA[The research with this title aims to find out the implementation of the precautionary principle which is carried out by a notary in the process of making a retroactive marriage agreement deed, namely an agreement whose process begins after the marriage is carried out. The focus of this research is how the notary applies the precautionary principle so that the agreement does not harm third parties, such as creditors, and ensures that the agreement remains legally valid. In addition, this research also explores the mechanism of making a marriage agreement deed in the realm of still protecting the interests of third parties. The research methodology presented in this study is a normative juridical approach by analyzing relevant laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and case studies. The results show that the prudential principles of notaries include checking the status of assets, notifying related parties, and complying with legal regulations. The mechanism applied by the notary also plays an important role in ensuring that the marriage agreement does not have a detrimental impact on third parties, as well as providing legal certainty for the parties involved. This research provides a conclusion on the application of the precautionary principle by notaries which is a crucial step in maintaining justice and legal certainty, especially in the making of retroactive marriage agreement deeds.]]>
<![CDATA[A Change of Circumstances and Contract Adjustment: Indonesian Law and Beyond ]]>
<![CDATA[Cahyono, Akhmad Budi]]>;
<![CDATA[Pangaribuan, Togi Marolop Pradana]]>;
<![CDATA[Raumanen, Vivika Dyatri]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Legal Transformation and Policy Challenges in Indonesia: Navigating Technology ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/jils.v10i1.1592
<![CDATA[In the case of long-term contracts, parties might find it challenging to anticipate the relevant state of affairs that may affect the performance of the contract in the future or any change of circumstances. This paper argues that implementing a change of circumstances doctrine that allows the disadvantaged party to demand contract adjustment has been applied since long ago in Indonesia. This application is particularly evident when it comes to changes in currency. The principle of justice becomes the main consideration for the judges to make contract adjustments due to changes in circumstances. However, some court decisions accepted such requests for contract adjustment due to a change in circumstances, even though it was based on a force majeure defense. In order to provide legal certainty in the future, it is highly recommended that legislators separate the rules of force majeure from the rules of change of circumstances.]]>
<![CDATA[Consumer Representative Actions in the Financial Sector ]]>
<![CDATA[Wijayanti, Sita Adelia Jatu]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyono, Akhmad Budi]]>
<![CDATA[ Nagari Law Review Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Nagari Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Andalas University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.7.i.1.p.1-13.2023
<![CDATA[The presence of a non-governmental consumer protection organization plays a vital role in assisting consumers whose position tends to be weak and overseeing the implementation of bank executions so that they are carried out fairly. The organization can also represent a broad group of consumers to appear before the court for consumer protection. This study analyzes the legal protection of consumers based on the omnibus financial law of the Financial Sector Development and Strengthening Law and the Consumer Protection Law as well as the role of non-governmental consumer protection institutions in providing advocacy and consultation to consumers in the financial services sector. This study also addresses the legal standing of nongovernmental consumer protection organizations in court. This study aims to provide an analysis of consumer protection in the financial services sector and the role of nongovernmental consumer protection organizations in their involvement in consumer disputes in the financial services sector. The results of the research are based on case studies, that there are still lawsuits filed by non-governmental consumer protection organizations on behalf of consumers in the financial services sector that do not meet the requirements as stipulated in the Law.]]>
<![CDATA[Perjanjian Waralaba yang Belum Terdaftar: Batal Demi Hukum atau Dapat Dibatalkan? ]]>
<![CDATA[Rahma Widiastuti, Ambria]]>;
<![CDATA[Akhmad Budi Cahyono]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2307
<![CDATA[Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 concerning Franchising (PP 42/2007), requires that the Franchisor must register the Franchise prospectus which is followed up with the registration of the Franchise Agreement by the Franchisee. Failure to register the Franchise Agreement results in the agreement being null and void because the Franchise Agreement is included in the form of a Formal Agreement. Void and void means returning the parties to their original state when the agreement had not yet been formed. However, if the Franchisee suffers a loss, he can sue the Franchisor for compensation on the basis of an Unlawful Act. The Franchisee will not experience such losses if the Franchisor registers its franchise prospectus. This study uses a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach.]]>
<![CDATA[Pencatatan Perjanjian Perkawinan dalam Perkawinan Campuran Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Perlukah Pengesahan dari Pengadilan? ]]>
<![CDATA[Raja Hamnan, Nauval]]>;
<![CDATA[Budi Cahyono, Akhmad]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i1.2351
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini membahas kepastian hukum dalam pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan setelah adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Dengan latar belakang pentingnya perkawinan dalam kehidupan manusia dan kompleksitas hukum yang timbul dalam perkawinan campuran, penelitian ini mengkaji keabsahan perjanjian perkawinan, mempertimbangkan apakah perjanjian perkawinan membutuhkan pengesahan melalui lembaga peradilan (Pengadilan Agama/Negeri) atau cukup pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam bentuk akta otentik. Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif, dengan menggunakan daftar pustaka yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Penelitian memperlihatkan terkait meskipun perjanjian perkawinan di bawah tangan sah menurut Pasal 1313 KUHPerdata, mereka menghadapi tantangan dalam hal kekuatan dan kepastian hukum. Putusan MK No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 memperluas pemahaman tentang perjanjian perkawinan, mengakui perjanjian pasca-nikah, dan peranan pengadilan dalam pengesahan dari suatu perjanjian perkawinan pada kasus tertentu. Saran dari penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan kesadaran dan edukasi hukum tentang pentingnya pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam bentuk akta otentik dan peranan pengadilan dalam menilai keabsahannya, guna memastikan kepastian hukum dan mengurangi risiko sengketa hukum.]]>
<![CDATA[The Urgency of Regulating the Rescission of Child Adoption: A Comparative Study on Upholding the Best Interests of the Child ]]>
<![CDATA[Nabila, Farradhisya Ririz]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyono, Akhmad Budi]]>
<![CDATA[ Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 19 No. 3 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v19no3.4329
<![CDATA[The absence of specific regulations governing the cancellation of child adoption in Indonesia has created a legal vacuum that undermines the principle of the best interests of the child. This study aims to develop an ideal legal framework for adoption cancellation to prevent practices contrary to child protection principles. Using a doctrinal approach and a comparative analysis with the Philippine legal system, the research emphasizes the urgency of establishing clear regulations that prioritize the child’s welfare in every judicial decision. The proposed reform integrates Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence (UUPKDRT) and Government Regulation No. 54 of 2007 on the Implementation of Child Adoption to provide a comprehensive legal basis. Strengthening these instruments would ensure that violence by adoptive parents constitutes valid grounds for cancellation while safeguarding the child’s rights to continuous care, protection, and development before and after annulment.]]>
