Articles
<![CDATA[RADICALIZATION IN THE TEACHING RELIGION AND ITS RELATIONS WITH CRIMINAL ACTS OF TERRORISM ]]>
<![CDATA[Hasibuan, Hoiruddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Sudarsono, Sudarsono]]>;
<![CDATA[Nurjaya, I Nyoman]]>;
<![CDATA[Sugiri, Bambang]]>
<![CDATA[ Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Law and Sustainable Development ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (369.736 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2017.004.02.02
<![CDATA[The criminal act of terrorism is a crime against humanity, human civilization and constitute a serious threat to the integrity and sovereignty of a nation. In fact, terrorism can be a threat to a state security and sovereignty as well as world peace.It is argued that one of the main causes of criminal acts of terrorism is radicalization. Thus, this paper seeks to analyze the casual link between radicalization and terrorism. This paper determines to what extent does the radicalization affected the criminal acts of terrorism. This research uses a juridical normative method by analyzing legal instruments relating to terrorism and seeks to analyze the reason behind the provided rules.This paper submitted that while radicalization affected terrorism, de-radicalization is urgent in responding to terrorism. This paper also proposes how de-radicalization works in preventing terrorism.]]>
<![CDATA[PHYLOSOPHICAL AND CONSTITUSIONAL PROTECTION TOWARDS RELIGION IN INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Silfiah, Rossa Ilma]]>;
<![CDATA[Luth, Thohir]]>;
<![CDATA[Sugiri, Bambang]]>;
<![CDATA[Aprilianda, Nurini]]>
<![CDATA[ Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Contemporary Indigenous and Constitutional Issues: Transnational Perspective ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (131.72 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2016.003.02.04
<![CDATA[Legal protection on religion is certainty for a state with Pancasila principle. The first principle   the Divinity of the Only God has been spirit of the following points, as living guidance for Indonesian country. The believing of    the Divinity of the Only God shows that the Indonesian Republic is religious based country by protecting freedom to have religion for its people.  This regulation has implication in governmental circle, that the country makes Religion Ministry as one of ministries that its existence has the same position to other state institutions.   The implementation of legal protection toward religion needs legitimating in the field of civil law, showed in issuing President  Decree   No. 1 of 1965 on the Preventing of    Misuse and/or Religion Staining. The existence of this  Decree  in Old Order has been legitimated newly as a Law by issuing the Law  No. 5 of 1969, thus the President Decree has been added to the Criminal Code, Act  156a.]]>
<![CDATA[RASIO LEGIS PASAL 43 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2011 TERKAIT DENGAN IMPLEMENTASINYA ]]>
<![CDATA[Landya Maria Simatupang]]>;
<![CDATA[Imam Koeswahyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Bambang Sugiri]]>
<![CDATA[ Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 46, No 4 (2017): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (2016.94 KB)
|
DOI: 10.14710/mmh.46.4.2017.291-298
<![CDATA[Setelah terbitnya Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang Rumah Susun, muncul permasalahan saat implementasi UU dimaksud yaitu perjanjian/akta apa yang dapat dipergunakan dalam hal syarat-syarat untuk melaksanakan PPJB sebagaimana di atur dalam Pasal 43 UU Rumah Susun belum terpenuhi. Pasal 43 UU Rumah Susun mengijinkan pengembang untuk melakukan penjualan satuan rumah susun yang dibangunnya, asalkan memenuhi persyaratan - persyaratan yang diatur dalam Pasal 43 UU ayat (2) tersebut. Selanjutnya, dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis empiris, penulis mengkaji lebih lanjut apa yang menjadi rasio legis pengaturan dari Pasal 43 UU Rumah Susun yang wajib dipatuhi oleh pengembang. Kemudian dari hasil penelitian tersebut diketahui bahwa rasio legis pengaturan ketentuan tersebut adalah dalam rangka perlindungan konsumen.]]>
<![CDATA[Penegakan Hukum Pidana Perusahaan yang Tidak Memenuhi Kewajibannya dalam Program Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial ]]>
<![CDATA[Didik Lestariyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Bambang Sugiri]]>;
<![CDATA[Rachmad Safa'at]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2019): December 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Merdeka Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v10i2.3225
<![CDATA[There is a gap between das sollen and das sein. Das sollen (legal regulations) in Article 19 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) jo. Article 55 of the BPJS Law provides criminal sanctions to companies that do not pay BPJS contributions to their workers. However, das sein (in fact / events that occur in the community) companies are not subject to criminal sanctions even though the criminal elements in the BPJS Law have been fulfilled. This study uses an empirical juridical method with a sociological juridical approach. The conclusions of this study are 1) Factors that cause companies not fulfilling their obligations as participants in the program due to the company's lack of discipline in managing finances which should be used as contributions to BPJS program workers and because the relevant stakeholders only provide administrative sanctions to companies. 2) The legal implication for companies is that they are subject to administrative sanctions. 3) Law enforcement efforts carried out by law enforcement officers against companies that do not fulfill their obligations in the BPJS program in Malang Regency are the imposition of criminal sanctions.How to cite item: Lestariyono, D., Sugiri, B., Safa'at, R. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Pidana Perusahaan yang Tidak Memenuhi Kewajibannya dalam Program Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(2), 156-165. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i2.3225]]>
<![CDATA[FUNGSI BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 20/PUU-XIV/2016 ]]>
<![CDATA[Arief Heryogi]]>;
<![CDATA[Masruchin Ruba’i]]>;
<![CDATA[Bambang Sugiri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Juni 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (112.501 KB)
<![CDATA[Abstract: Decision of the Constitusional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20/PUU-XIV/2016 has given the interpretation of the Article 5 (1), 5 (2) and 44b Law of The Republic Indonesia Number 11 of 2008 Concerning Electronic Informations and Transactions has given negatif implication for the law of criminal procedure because theelectronic evidence in practice is so important for uncovering the truth of the material in the trial. The purpose of this research are 1) to analyze of urgency of electronic evidence to seeking the thruth of the material by judge 2) to analyze the juridical implications ofDecision of the Constitusional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20/PUU-XIV/2016 againts the validity of the electronic evidence in law of criminal procedure 3) to find the new concept for evidence law in the law of criminal procedure. The methode used in this research is legal research with case approach, case approach and conceptual approach. The results of this research is validity of electronic evidence used in trial are dependent on permission from the law enforcement agencies and make no unauthorized elektronic evidence submitted to the procedings without the permission of law enforcement agencies becomes invalid. This is contrary to the spirit of the criminal law enforcement in trying to follow the flow of the development of information technology because in some cases, electronic evidence used to ease of proof such as the use of cctv, electronic mail, etc. Electronic evidence is currently categorized as a legitimate instrument of evidence in The Indonesian Law of Criminal Procedure(KUHAP), so in the coming law should be admitted as evidence in order to guarantee legal certaintyAbstrak: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016yang memberi penafsiran terhadap pasal 5 ayat (1), 5 ayat (2), dan pasal 44b undang-undang nomor 11 tahun 2008 berimplikasi negatif terhadap hukum acara pidana mengingat dalam praktiknya bukti elektronik dipandang penting dipergunakan untuk mengungkap kebenaran materiil di persidangan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah 1) Untuk menganalisis urgensi bukti elektronik dalam mencari kebenaran materiil oleh Hakim mengingat derasnya perkembangan teknologi informasi 2) Untuk menganalisis implikasi yuridis Putusan Mahkamah konstitusi No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016 terhadap Keabsahan Bukti Elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Pidana 3) Untuk menemukan konsep pembaruan hukum baru dalam Hukum Pembuktian di Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia.Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan kasus (case approach), pendekatan konsep (conseptual approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah keabsahan bukti elektronik yang digunakan dalam persidangan bergantung kepada izin dari penegak hukum dan membuat tidak sah bukti elektronik yang diajukan ke persidangan tanpa izin penegak hukum menjadi tidak sah. Hal ini bertentangan dengan semangat dalam penegakan hukum pidana yang berusaha mengikuti arus perkembangan teknologi informasi karena dalam beberapa kasus, bukti elektronik dipergunakan untuk mempermudah pembuktian seperti penggunaan teleconfrence CCTV, Surat elektronik dan sebagainya. Bukti elektronik saat ini belum dikategorikan sebagai alat bukti yang sah dalam KUHAP, sehingga dalam Ius Constituendum harus dimasukan sebagai alat bukti untuk menjamin kepastian hukum DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i12017p007]]>
<![CDATA[ARAH CAMPUR TANGAN URUSAN PERADILAN PASAL 3 AYAT (2) UU No. 48 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN SEBAGAI KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ibnu Subarkah]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Nurjaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Bambang Sugiri]]>;
<![CDATA[Masruchin Ruba’i]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol 4, No 2 (2021): NOVEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26623/julr.v4i2.4188
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi ketidakjelasan makna larangan campur tangan urusan peradilan dalam Pasal 3 ayat (2) UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman yang berimplikasi pada arah makna tersebut, dimana dalam prakteknya telah banyak kasus-kasus dalam tingkat ketatanegaraan dan peradilan yang nota bene dapat diselaraskan dengan Contempt ofCcourt/CoC. yang mempengaruhi kewibawaan hakim dan badan peradilan. Metode yang digunakan melalui penelitian hukum bahan-bahan hukum, dengan analisis preskriptif. Tujuannya adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis hubungan campur tangan dalam Pasal 3 ayat (2) UU No., 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman berkaitan dengan Contempt of Court, dan diperlukannya kebijakan hukum pidana ke depan.Adapun hasil dan pembahasan ditemukan bahwa antara makna campur tangan urusan peradilan pada Pasal 3 ayat (2) undang-undang di atas hakekatnya tidak berbeda dengan perbuatan penghinaan pengadilan (contempt of court) dimana terdapat sebagian masyarakat yang memandang hal tersebut berbeda, misalnya adanya upaya untuk menyusun pengaturannya melalui RUU CoC dan perubahan KUHP yang mengatur Tindak Pidana dalam Penyelenggaraan Peradilan. Kebijakan hukum pidana yang mengadopsi hukum sebagai satu kesatuan sistem sangat kompeten dalam mengatur implikasi atas norma Pasal 3 ayat (3) undang-undang di atas dengan cara mengusulkan perubahan undang-undang tersebut sebagai hukum pidana khusus ke depan. Kesimpulannya bahwa terdapat hubungan antara Pasal 3 ayat (2) UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman dengan perbuatan penghinaan pengadilan untuk menentukan arah perubahan UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasan Kehakiman melalui Pasal 3 ayat (2) UU tersebut yang hasilnya sebagai kebijakan hukum pidana (hukum pidana khusus).]]>
<![CDATA[Significancy and Subtancy of Civil Suit Compensation in Corruption Case where the Defendant was Acquitted by Judge ]]>
<![CDATA[Alfon Alfon]]>;
<![CDATA[Suhariningsih Suhariningsih]]>;
<![CDATA[Bambang Sugiri]]>;
<![CDATA[Prija Djatmika]]>
<![CDATA[ Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3, No 4 (2020): Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education, Novemb ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[BIRCU ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33258/birle.v3i4.1418
<![CDATA[The spirit of Article 32 paragraph (2) of UU 31 / 1999 jo. UU 20 / 2001 means the country can use its right to a civil action for compensation for financial loss recovery state. The rationale for setting lawsuit replace losses in the article that indicates that in order to restore the country's financial losses due to corruption is not enough only in lean to the norms of criminal law. If the UU 31 / 1999 jo. UU 20/2001 categorized as Criminal Laws, then the regulation of a civil lawsuit in the Law, shows that a Prevailing Law may contain aspects of both criminal law and civil law. The study is the study of law by using the approach of Legislation, conceptual and historical approach. The results were obtained from studies of this are: 1) The specificity handling of corruption judging from the way the settlement; 2) The meaning and essence of civil suit for damages in the enforcement of the law on corruption. The civil lawsuit instrument is intended to maximize the return on state financial losses, because criminal efforts do not always succeed in recovering the entire state financial losses. The limitations of criminal law make criminal law instruments not the only one to solve the problem of returning state finances due to criminal acts of corruption.]]>
<![CDATA[Electronic Criminal Trial Reform That Guarantees Due Process Of Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Fendy Aditiya Siswa YULIANTO]]>;
<![CDATA[Bambang SUGIRI]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science (Jul ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesia Strategic Sustainability ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38142/ijesss.v3i2.273
<![CDATA[This study examines how the reformulation of electronic criminal trials in Indonesia ensures the correct legal process. The research approach used is normative juridical law research, namely by analyzing several primary kinds of literature such as legislation, and legal theory to the views of scholars. The results obtained from this study are that Indonesia as a state of law certainly in its judicial system must obey the law. Indonesia is currently trying to impose electronic trials in resolving several cases in court through the use of electronic media such as teleconferences. This activity is based on the legislation governing electronic criminal trials such as PERMA Number 1 of 2019, PERMA Number 4 of 2020, the Criminal Code, and other related regulations. This regulation forms the basis for the implementation of electronic trials in Indonesia with the main objective of creating fast, simple, and inexpensive trials. However, the facts on the ground show that the problems that occur related to the implementation of this activity are not only technical problems or facilities and infrastructure but also public doubts about the quality of the results of the trial. This phenomenon also occurs in several countries that enforce electronic courts, such as the United States and the Netherlands. Therefore, there is a need for reformulation of statements in legislation so that it does not only focus on the goal of creating a fast, simple and inexpensive judiciary but also needs to be emphasized to ensure the proper legal process occurs.]]>
<![CDATA[Criminalization of Gratification as a Corruption Offense ]]>
<![CDATA[Samsul Huda]]>;
<![CDATA[Bambang Sugiri]]>;
<![CDATA[Nurini Aprilianda]]>;
<![CDATA[Heru Ratno Hadi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani Vol. 2 No. 12 (2022): December 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55927/mudima.v2i12.2052
<![CDATA[Gratification or gifts are criminal acts of corruption, if given to state officials or civil servants. The form of corruption is bribery. This corruption crime was only formulated in Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption (hereinafter referred to as the Corruption Law). The birth of the regulation regarding gratification as one of the criminal acts of corruption in the Anti-Corruption Law is a form of state anticipation in dealing with various new modus operandi in acts of corruption. In order to provide a sense of justice, usefulness and legal certainty in its implementation, gratification offenses should be prepared on a philosophical, sociological and juridical basis. The study aims to find out bribe and gratification acts. This study uses normative research methods. Moreover, as part of the element of offense in the criminal act of corruption with the offense itself being the recipient of gratification, the proof in gratification adheres to the principle of the reverse burden of proof. Therefore, in the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, Gratification recipients are required to submit a report to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) within 30 (thirty) days. the gratification report is received by the KPK, within 30 (thirty) days the KPK will determine whether the gratification is a bribe or not. If it is proven that a bribe is proven, the gratuity will become the property of the state and vice versa if it is not related, then the gratification becomes the right of the recipient of the gratification]]>
<![CDATA[CHANGES IN POLICY DIRECTION AND LEGAL CONSEQUENCES LAW NO. 17 OF 2023 CONCERNING HEALTH ON ABORTION ISSUES IN THE TRANSITION PERIOD FOR RENEWING THE CRIMINAL CODE ]]>
<![CDATA[Novi Enjelina Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Abdul Madjid]]>;
<![CDATA[Bambang Sugiri]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): January ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[RADJA PUBLIKA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i1.1442
<![CDATA[This research began with confusion regarding changes in the direction of legal regulatory policies regarding abortion in Indonesia. This is proven by the amendment to the Health Law Number 17 of 2023 which is part of the health omnibus law, which can result in multiple interpretations because it refers to the criteria specified in the criminal code. However, it is not explained which criminal law book will be used, which could create gaps in the application of criminal law in cases of legal abortion in Indonesia. The possibility of interpretation in determining the criminal law book is due to the transition period for the implementation of the new criminal law book, namely Law Number 1 of 2023, which will still come into force in 2026. The difference in the policy direction of the old criminal law book and The new one is very significant because the new one regulates the exceptions to which abortion can be carried out, whereas the old one does not see any reason and categorizes abortion as a criminal offense and will be subject to imprisonment for those who violate it. These differences in provisions will certainly have quite different legal consequences if the legal regulations are incorrectly applied in dealing with the issue of legal abortion in Indonesia. If they are incorrect then the disadvantage is the pregnant mother who has the right to abortion. This research uses normative legal research by looking at conceptual approaches and also legislation. With the aim of seeing how the legislation regarding abortion continues to undergo changes and the legal consequences that arise from these policies.]]>
