Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.993
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)
Prija Djatmika
Doctor Of Law Study Program, Faculty Of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
HAMBATAN DAN UPAYA MAJELIS PENGAWAS DAERAH DALAM MELAKUKAN PENGAWASAN NOTARIS DI KOTA BANAJRMASIN Neneng Septika Dagis; Prija Djatmika; Endang Sri Kawuryan
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 6, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (241.692 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v6i1.14223

Abstract

 Notaris merupakan pejabat umum yang mempunyai tugas dan kewajiban memberikan pelayanan dan konsultasi hukum kepada masyarakat yang membutuhkan. Bantuan hukum yang dapat diberikan oleh seorang notaris adalah dalam bentuk pembuatan akta otentik ataupun berbagai kewenangan lainnya yang telah diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga fungsi notaris sangat penting. Dalam menjalankan tugasnya, notaris di kota Banjarmasin diawasi oleh Majelis Pengawas Daerah Kota Banjarmasin. Saat ini banyak sekali notaris yang melakukan pelanggaran di berbagai daerah, hal tersebut tidak menutup kemungkinan juga terjadi di Kota Banjarmasin ditambah akibat pertumbuhan perekonomian di Kota Banjarmasin memberikan dampak yang signifikan pada kebutuhan masyarakat terhadap jasa notaris dalam pembuatan akta jual beli ataupun perjanjian lainnya. Penelitian ini mertupakan penelitian yuridis empiris, Pendekatan penelitian yuridis sosiologis dengan menggunakan data primer dengan melakukan wawancara, sekunder dengan melakukan studi kepustakaan. Hasil dan pembahasan menemukan bahwa terdapat beberapa hambatan yang terjadi di lapangan, mulai dari jarak, waktu hingga biaya dimana hal tersebut diselesaikan dengan upaya penjadwalan ulang pengawasan dan diperlukan sekretariat MPD di Kota Banjarmasin.Kata-Kunci: Hambatan, Upaya, Pengawasan, Notaris, Majelis PengawasDaerahNotaries are public officials who have the duty and obligation to provide legal services and consultations to people in need. Legal assistance that can be provided by a notary is in the form of making an authentic deed or various other authorities that have been regulated in laws and regulations so that the function of a notary is very important. In carrying out their duties, notaries in the city of Banjarmasin are supervised by the Regional Supervisory Council of the City of Banjarmasin. Currently, there are many notaries who commit violations in various regions, it is also possible that it will also occur in the City of Banjarmasin, plus the economic growth in the City of Banjarmasin has a significant impact on the community's need for notary services in making sale and purchase deeds or other agreements. This research is an empirical juridical research, a sociological juridical research approach using primary data by conducting interviews, secondary by conducting library research. The results and discussion found that there were several obstacles that occurred in the field, ranging from distance, time to cost where this was resolved by rescheduling the supervision and requiring an MPD secretariat in Banjarmasin City.Keywords: Obstacles, Efforts, Supervision, Notary, Regional Supervisory Council
Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Terhadap Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Johanes Bornok Butar Butar; Prija Djatmika; Yuliati Yuliati
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p12

Abstract

Corporations are often neglected in the development of law as well as participation in legal development, making it vulnerable to access to justice. Corporations must obtain the same rights as humans in accordance with the laws and regulations concerning corporations as legal subjects. This is to give a sense of fairness to those who work in the company. The purpose of this study is to examine, find facts and analyze criminal liability for corporations against vehicles that have traffic accidents due to not conducting periodic tests. The method used is a type of normative juridical writing method using a statutory approach. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the LLAJ Law only focuses on vehicle drivers, the fact is that the cause of some traffic accidents is because the company does not conduct periodic tests on its vehicles. It is the responsibility of the company to conduct periodic tests on its vehicles every six months, but based on the cases described in the results of the discussion, traffic accidents caused by not conducting periodic tests by the company only focus on the fault of the driver. The current laws and regulations regarding traffic certainly do not fully support legal subjects in Indonesia, therefore there is a need for a formulation of criminal liability against corporations. Korporasi sering dilupakan dalam perkembangan hukum dan juga partisipasi dalam pembangunan hukum, sehingga menjadi rentan aksesnya terhadap keadilan. Korporasi harus memperoleh hak yang sama dengan manusia sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan tentang korporasi sebagai subjek hukum. Hal ini untuk memberikan rasa adil kepada mereka yang bekerja didalam perusahaan tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji, menemukan fakta dan menganalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi korporasi terhadap kendaraannya yang mengalami kecelakaan lalu lintas akibat tidak melakukan uji berkala. Metode yang digunakan adalah jenis metode penulisan yuridis normatif dengan menggunkan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa UU LLAJ hanya menitikberatkan terhadap pengemudi kendaraan, kenyataannya bahwa penyebab beberapa kecelakaan lalu lintas adalah karena perusahaan tidak melakukan uji berkala terhadap kendaraanya. Uji berkala tersebut merupakan tanggungjawab dari perusahaan untuk melakukan pengujian secara berkala terhadap kendaraanya selama 6 bulan sekali, namun berdasarkan kasus yang diuraikan dalam hasil pembahsan, kecelakaan lalu lintas yang disebabkan karena tidak dilakukan uji berkala oleh perusahaan hanya menitikberatkan kesalahan terhadap pengemudi. Peraturan perundang-undangan tentang lalu lintas saat ini tentu sangat tidak mendukung sepenuhnya subjek hukum di Indonesia, oleh karena itu perlu adanya formulasi pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap korporasi.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA NOTARIS DAN PARA PIHAK YANG MEMALSUKAN SURAT KETERANGAN OBYEK PEWARIS Billy Adhi Pramarta; Rachmad Safa'at; Prija Djatmika
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 3, No 1 (2018): Juni 2018
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (235.586 KB)

Abstract

This article described the elements of criminal acts against falsification of inheritance certificate, the responsibility of a notary and the one whose certificate of inheritance had been falsified by the others, and the legal consequences of a court decision on the land which certificate of inheritance had been falsified by the other. The method used normative juridical by using a legislative approach and conceptual approach. The results of the study showed that the element of criminal acts against forgery of inheritance certificate is the intention and intent to falsify, the act violates the provisions of the Notary Position Act (UUJN), and the notary didn’t an act outside his authority. The criminal responsibility of a notary carried out his place it is proven to have committed a violation. The regulation didn’t specifically regulate criminal sanctions against notaries who have been falsified letters due to fraud and errors committed by the complainants. The legal consequences of a certificate of inheritance forged by one of the parties made by a notary were null and void because it has removed one of the heirs and the letter would be cancelled if the postulating party can prove in court in court.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v3i12018p022
Significancy and Subtancy of Civil Suit Compensation in Corruption Case where the Defendant was Acquitted by Judge Alfon Alfon; Suhariningsih Suhariningsih; Bambang Sugiri; Prija Djatmika
Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3, No 4 (2020): Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education, Novemb
Publisher : BIRCU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birle.v3i4.1418

Abstract

The spirit of Article 32 paragraph (2) of UU 31 / 1999 jo. UU 20 / 2001 means the country can use its right to a civil action for compensation for financial loss recovery state. The rationale for setting lawsuit replace losses in the article that indicates that in order to restore the country's financial losses due to corruption is not enough only in lean to the norms of criminal law. If the UU 31 / 1999 jo. UU 20/2001 categorized as Criminal Laws, then the regulation of a civil lawsuit in the Law, shows that a Prevailing Law may contain aspects of both criminal law and civil law. The study is the study of law by using the approach of Legislation, conceptual and historical approach. The results were obtained from studies of this are: 1) The specificity handling of corruption judging from the way the settlement; 2) The meaning and essence of civil suit for damages in the enforcement of the law on corruption. The civil lawsuit instrument is intended to maximize the return on state financial losses, because criminal efforts do not always succeed in recovering the entire state financial losses. The limitations of criminal law make criminal law instruments not the only one to solve the problem of returning state finances due to criminal acts of corruption.
Rasio legis eksistensi pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia Ahmad Fauzi; Abdul Madjid; Nurini Aprilianda; Prija Djatmika
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 12, No 1 (2021): April 2021
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5779

Abstract

Corruption if allowed to have a real economic impact, namely unequal income and increasing poverty Corruption is a common problem that occurs in almost every country, the modus operandi of corruption is to use the authority and power to take advantage for personal gain or third parties, therefore to overcome corruption crimes need a way to tackle corruption crimes. This research is a legal research using the socio-normative approach. The data used are primary data and secondary data which were analyzed using quantitative analysis. The main aspect in tackling corruption crimes is to use a law enforcement approach, one of the approaches to law enforcement is to create a Corruption Crime Court as regulated in Law No. 46 of 2009 concerning the Corruption Crime Court as an institution in charge of examining and deciding cases of criminal acts of corruption. The position of the court for criminal acts of corruption actually has a strong legal standing in the Indonesian criminal justice system, and its existence is very important and urgent in tackling corruption crimes in Indonesia.How to cite item: Fauzi, A., Madjid, A., Aprilianda, N., Djatmika, P. (2021). Rasiolegis eksistensi pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(1), 11-20. doi:10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5779.
THE URGENCY OF FORMING SPECIAL CRIMINAL LAWS FOR CRIMINALS COMMITTED BY CHILDREN IN CASES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN REVIEWED FROM THEORY OF LEGAL CERTAINTY Imera Azzahra Alivia; Prija Djatmika; Nurini Aprilianda
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i6.2077

Abstract

Sexual violence against children committed by child perpetrators is a serious issue in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. Currently, Indonesian criminal law does not specifically regulate a comprehensive handling mechanism for this case, thus causing problems in the application of fair law and providing optimal protection for children as victims and perpetrators. This study aims to analyze the urgency of establishing a special criminal law that handles criminal acts of sexual violence by children against other children. A normative legal approach with a conceptual approach, a legislative approach and a comparative approach and the theory of legal certainty are used in this study to explore the need for clearer and more responsive regulations. The results of the study indicate that the establishment of a special criminal law can provide better legal certainty, including appropriate protection and rehabilitation mechanisms for children as perpetrators and victims. This is important to ensure that the criminal justice system not only prioritizes punishment, but also protection and rehabilitation in accordance with the principle of the best interests of the child. The establishment of this special regulation can also strengthen the justice system to be more adaptive and responsive to the special characteristics of cases of child sexual violence.
THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE DISSYNCHRONIZATION IN THE REGULATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE WITHIN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY Dhia Fadlia; Prija Djatmika; Yuliati
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i6.2132

Abstract

The regulation of restorative justice within the criminal justice system in Indonesia is currently governed by the respective law enforcement agencies, but it has not been codified in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), which can lead to legal uncertainty. Consequently, there are legal implications arising from the lack of synchronization in the regulation of restorative justice within Indonesia’s criminal justice system, particularly from the perspective of legal certainty. Therefore, this study aims to reconstruct the regulation of restorative justice to ensure legal certainty in the future. This research is a normative-juridical study utilizing both statutory and synchronic approaches. There are fundamental differences concerning the conditions and limitations of criminal acts as regulated by Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021, Prosecutor's Regulation No. 15 of 2020, and Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2024. The existing partial guidelines on restorative justice, particularly regarding the conditions set forth, are inconsistent and cause legal uncertainty in determining which cases may be eligible for restorative justice, especially those under the Police institution, where the criteria are considered overly broad. Thus, the differences in restorative justice regulations among the respective agencies lead to inconsistencies in the conditions and limitations of criminal acts, as well as confusion in the restorative justice process during the investigation and inquiry stages within the Police. There is a need for specific regulation on restorative justice to be incorporated into the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) to avoid inconsistencies and legal uncertainty.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 65/PUU-VIII/2010 IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Ummi Khasanah Sitorus Pane; Abdul Madjid; Prija Djatmika
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2623

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 65/PUU-VIII/2010 provides a new meaning regarding witnesses in the Criminal Procedure Code, by recognizing witnesses as testimonium de auditu. Since the decision was pronounced, the Constitutional Court's decision has come into force and is binding on everyone, especially for the process of investigation, prosecution and trial in court. However, in practice, the Constitutional Court's decision is not followed by judicial bodies under the Supreme Court, in the concrete case of the decision of the West Pasaman District Court No. 191/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Psb which does not consider and decide based on the decision of the Constitutional Court which has become part of the criminal procedural law. In fact, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 65/PUU-VIII/2010 should be legally binding on all.
THE JUSTICE ASPECT OF JUDICIAL CONSIDERATIONS ON THE FULFILLMENT OF VICTIMS’ RIGHTS IN PAST ACTS OF TERRORISM Rizky Kurnia; Prija Djatmika; Milda Istiqomah
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2733

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 103/PUU-XXI/2023 marks a pivotal turning point in the protection of the rights of victims of terrorism, particularly those affected prior to the enactment of Law Number 5 of 2018, who have not yet received adequate legal protection. This paper analyzes the aspect of justice considered by the Constitutional Court judges in fulfilling the rights of past victims of terrorism as reflected in Decision Number 103/PUU-XXI/2023, as well as the conceptual framework for the realization of such rights within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The findings of this study reveal that the element of justice in the Court's reasoning is embodied in a substantive and humanistic approach, which reinforces the state's responsibility to fulfill the constitutional rights of victims of past terrorism acts as a manifestation of human rights protection and the principle of equality before the law. The ideal concept of fulfilling the rights of victims of past acts of terrorism emphasizes restorative justice through recognition, protection, and recovery, supported by a comprehensive legal framework and equitable, implementable policies.
BASIS FOR JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN SENTIMENTING CRIMINAL SENTENCES BELOW THE MINIMUM SPECIFICALLY IN THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF INDEMNITY REVIEWED FROM THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY (Study of Decision Number 7/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Sos) Andi Pambudi Utomo; Prija Djatmika; Milda Istiqomah
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2762

Abstract

Hakim memainkan peranan penting dalam menegakkan hukum dan keadilan, termasuk ketika menjatuhkan pidana di bawah batas minimum khusus dalam perkara pencabulan terhadap anak. Meskipun langkah ini dimaksudkan untuk mewujudkan keadilan substantif, penerapannya dapat menimbulkan dilema hukum karena berisiko mengurangi kepastian hukum dan menyebabkan ketidakkonsistenan dalam putusan. Oleh karena itu, perlu dilakukan kajian lebih mendalam untuk menemukan titik temu antara keadilan dan kepastian hukum dalam praktik peradilan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana di bawah batas minimum khusus dalam perkara pencabulan anak dari sudut pandang asas kepastian hukum. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mengevaluasi dampak hukum dari praktik tersebut terhadap sistem peradilan pidana dan jaminan perlindungan hukum bagi korban. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, dengan penelaahan terhadap regulasi dan studi kasus. Sumber data meliputi bahan hukum primer (peraturan perundang-undangan), bahan hukum sekunder (literatur akademik), serta bahan hukum tersier (kamus hukum). Analisis dilakukan melalui metode interpretasi ekstensif guna menilai penerapan asas kepastian hukum serta ruang kebebasan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan. Temuan penelitian mengungkap bahwa hakim mempertimbangkan faktor hukum maupun non-hukum dalam menjatuhkan pidana di bawah minimum khusus. Walaupun langkah ini bertujuan mengharmoniskan antara keadilan dan kepastian hukum, praktik tersebut tetap berpotensi menimbulkan disparitas putusan dan ketidakpastian hukum. Selain itu, penggunaan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) sebagai acuan juga menimbulkan perdebatan terkait supremasi hukum dan konsistensi penerapan pidana minimum khusus.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Ahmad Fauzi Alfon Alfon Alya Dean Putri Andi Pambudi Utomo Bambang Sugiri Billy Adhi Pramarta Dhia Fadlia Dian Devananda Akbar Endang Sri Kawuryan Entang Nuryanto I Nyoman Nurjaya Imera Azzahra Alivia Johanes Bornok Butar Butar Matius Evan Anggara Milda Istiqomah Neneng Septika Dagis Nurini Aprilianda Rachmad Safa'at Rizky Kurnia Setiawan Nerdajasakti Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Ummi Khasanah Sitorus Pane Ummu Salamah Yuliati Yuliati Yuliati Yuliati