Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MAQASHID : Jurnal Hukum Islam Religia : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman
Miladu Ahadi Ahmad
UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PANDANGAN HAKIM PENGADILAN AGAMA KABUPATEN MALANG DAN KYAI PPS SHIROTHUL FUQOHA’ TENTANG POSISI PENCATATAN DALAM KEABSAHAN PRAKTIK PERCERAIAN DI KABUPATEN MALANG PERSPEKTIF MASHLAHAH IMAM AS-SYATIBI: Miladu Ahadi Ahmad & Mudhofar Miladu Ahadi Ahmad; Mudhofar
MAQASHID Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): Mei 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah - IAI Al-Qolam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1280.362 KB) | DOI: 10.35897/maqashid.v3i1.288

Abstract

Pasal dalam KHI yang mengatur perceraian terbilang relevan dalam upaya mendamaikan hubungan pernikahan. Di sisi lain, pasal tersebut seakan-akan dapat menimbulkan kesenjangan hukum (conflict of norm) antara keputusan hukum islam dan hukum positif. Seperti contoh, dalam hukum islam, talak menjadi hak otoritatif suami, kapanpun suami mengucapkan talak kepada istrinya maka ucapan tersebut sudah dianggap jatuh. Berbeda dengan pasal yang ada dalam KHI, (pada pasal 115, 117 dan 123) disebutkan bahwa perceraian hanya bisa terjadi jika dilakukan ikrar di depan persidangan majelis hakim Pengadilan Agama. Dalam penelitian ini, ada dua hal penting yang diteliti yaitu pandangan hakim Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Malang dan Kyai PPS Shirothul Fuqoha’ serta pandangan keduanya ditinjau dari perspektif Mashlahah Imam As-Syatibi.
Khaled Abou El Fadl’s Perspective on Hadith Hermeneutics Syamsuddin; Miladu Ahadi Ahmad; Umi Sumbulah
Religia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu KeIslaman Vol 24 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/religia.v24i2.3311

Abstract

This article discusses the method of hadith hermeneutics according to Khaled M. Abou El-Fadl. El Fadl's academic concern is related to the authoritarianism of fatwas issued by several ulama and fatwa institutions. These fatwas are considered authoritarian and discriminatory towards women, seem rigid, and can’t adapt to the times. This authoritarianism phenomenon appears due to methodological errors in understanding legal texts, and the absence of negotiations between the text, the author, and the reader, each of whom has problems. Therefore, Khaled offers a hermeneutic method that consists of three things: text competence, meaning determination, and the concept of representation in Islam. If these three elements are met, then the fatwas of Islamic law produced by the ulama are authoritative, authoritarian, and discriminatoryThis article discusses themethod of hadith hermeneutics according to Khaled M. Abou El Fadl. El Fadl's academic concern is related to the authoritarianism of fatwas issued by several ulama and fatwa institutions. These fatwas are considered authoritarian and discriminatory towards women, seem rigid, and not adaptable to the times. This authoritarianism phenomenon appears due to methodological errors in understanding legal texts, and the absence of negotiations between the text, the author, and the reader, each of which has problems. Therefore, Khaled offers a hermeneutic method that consists of three things: text competence, meaning determination, and concept of representation in Islam. If these three elements are met, the fatwas of Islamic law produced by the ulama will be authoritative, authoritarian, and discriminatory. This research contributes to academic discourse by offering a nuanced perspective on the hermeneutics of hadith and fatwa production.
Co-Authors Mudhofar Syamsuddin Umi Sumbulah