Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pleno Jure SIGn Jurnal Hukum LEGAL BRIEF
Rustam Hs Akili
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gorontalo
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Urgensi Beracara di Pengadilan Perdata Terhadap Hukum Acara perdata Oyaldi Puhi; Rustam Hs Akili; Ibrahim Ahmad; Roy Marthen Moonti; Muten Nuna
PLENO JURE Vol 10 No 1 (2021): Pleno Jure, April
Publisher : LL-DIKTI Wilayah IX Sulawesi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37541/plenojure.v10i1.554

Abstract

Hukum acara perdata merupakan hukum perdata formil, yang pada dasarnya berfungsi mempertahankan atau menegakkan hukum perdata materiil melalui pengadilan apabila terjadi pelanggaran terhadap hukum perdata materiil atau terjadi sengketa. Bahkan hukum acara perdata juga mengatur bagaimana tata cara memperoleh hak dan kepastian hukum manakala tidak terjadi sengketa melalui pengajuan “permohonan” ke pengadilan. Artikel ini ingin menjelaskan bagaimana mekanisme beracara di pengadilan perdata terhadap hukum acara perdata, dengan menggunakan metode penulisan secara normatif. Sebagai kesimpulan, artikel ini menjelaskan bahwa didalam beracara hukum acara perdata dapat ditinjau dalam dua aspek yakni dalam arti luas dan dalam arti sempit, dalam arti luas beracara meliputi segala tindakan hukum yang dilakukan, baik di luar maupun di dalam persidangan di pengadilan guna menyelesaikan suatu perkara menurut ketentuan hukum acara perdata. Sedangkan dalam arti sempit, beracara meliputi tindakan beracara di dalam persidang di pengadilan dari sidang pertama sampai dengan hakim menjatuhkan putusannya. Sedangkan untuk prosedur dalam pengajuan Gugatan di Pengadilan merujuk pada Pasal 118 ayat (1) Herizen Indlandsch Reglement (“HIR”)/Pasal 142 RBg. Abstract. Civil procedural law is formal civil law which basically is to defend or enforce material civil law through the court if there is a violation of the law toward material civil law or a dispute. Even the civil procedural law also regulates how to obtain legal rights and certainty, if there is no dispute through filing an "application" to the court. This article aims to explain how the procedure of mechanisms in civil courts toward civil procedural law by using the normative writing method. In conclusion, this article explains that civil procedural law proceedings can be viewed in two aspects, which are broad sense and narrow sense. In the broad sense, it includes all legal actions that are taken both outside and inside the court to resolve the case according to the provisions of civil procedural law. Whereas in a narrow sense, it includes proceeding at trial in court from the first trial until the judge makes his decision. whereas, the procedure for filing a lawsuit in court is referring to Article 118 paragraph (1) Herizen Indlandsch Reglement (“HIR”) / Article 142 RBg.
Restorative Justice dalam Putusan Hakim Nomor: 31/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Lbto Atas Kasus Persetubuhan terhadap Anak Yohan Mahmud; Rustam H. S. Akili; Yusrianto Kadir; Roy Marthen Moonti
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 1 No 1: April - September 2019
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v1i1.37

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Dalam Kasus Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak (Putusan Nomor : 31/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Lbto dan Hambatan-Hambatan Penerapan Retorative Justice Dalam Perkara Nomor 31/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Lbto. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah metode penelitian normatif empiris merupakan penggabungan antara pendekatan hukum normatif dengan adanya penambahan berbagai unsur empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa konsep keadilan restorative justice sudah seharusnya dapat diterapkan dalam putusan hakim Nomor : 31/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Lbto karena terdakwa dalam hal ini mau untuk bertanggung jawab untuk menikahi korban dan korbanpun dalam hal ini tidak dirugikan. Kemudian dari sisi hambatan yang dialami yaitu hambatan dari segi social dan hambatan dari segi politik hokum pidana di Indonesia.
Juridical Analysis of Alleged Provision of False Information in Pretrial Corruption Cases of e-KTP Rustam HS Akili
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1129.215 KB) | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v11i2.346

Abstract

On April 5 2017, the KPK named Miryam S Haryani as a suspect in the alleged corruption case of e-KTP with Investigation Order No. Sprint Dik-28/01/04/2017. For her actions, Miryam is suspected of violating Article 22 in conjunction with Article 35 of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. On April 20, 2017, Miryam's legal team submitted a pretrial application stating that the KPK's determination of a suspect against his client was contrary to the law and the provisions of the applicable procedural law, because: a. The KPK does not have the authority to carry out investigations and investigations related to Article 22 of the Anti-Corruption Law, because Article 22 is regulated in Chapter III which is about other criminal acts related to corruption, so this is not the task and authority of the KPK as regulated in Article 6 Chapter II. KPK Law; b. The investigation into the criminal act of giving false information before the court is carried out based on article 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code; c. the determination of the suspect in the name of Miryam S Haryani was issued without two valid pieces of evidence. This study aims to determine the legal basis for determining the suspect as a pretrial object associated with the alleged criminal act of giving false information by Miryam S Haryani and to find out the authority of the KPK in investigating the case of the crime of giving false information by Miryam S Haryani in the e-KTP corruption case that was submitted for pretrial. at the South Jakarta District Court. The research method used is normative juridical, which is an approach to literature review as secondary data. The results of the study are, the legal basis for determining the suspect as an object of pretrial is the decision of the Constitutional Court no. 21/PUU-XII/2014 dated 28 April 2015, which provides prerequisites for the determination as a suspect, namely that a minimum of two pieces of evidence must be met as contained in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. If it is related to the alleged criminal act of giving false information by Miryam S Haryani, the pretrial application for the case number 47/Pid/Pra/2017/PN. Jkt. Sel, the determination of the suspect against Miryam S Haryani has been based on more than 2 (two) pieces of evidence.
Co-Authors Ibrahim Ahmad Moonti, Roy Marthen Nuna, Muten Oyaldi Puhi Yohan Mahmud Yusrianto Kadir